Melton Phillip E, Almasy Laura A
Centre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
Department of Genetics, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, USA.
BMC Proc. 2014 Jun 17;8(Suppl 1):S90. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-8-S1-S90. eCollection 2014.
Statistical genetic methods incorporating temporal variation allow for greater understanding of genetic architecture and consistency of biological variation influencing development of complex diseases. This study proposes a bivariate association method jointly testing association of two quantitative phenotypic measures from different time points. Measured genotype association was analyzed for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for systolic blood pressure (SBP) from the first and third visits using 200 simulated Genetic Analysis Workshop 18 (GAW18) replicates. Bivariate association, in which the effect of an SNP on the mean trait values of the two phenotypes is constrained to be equal for both measures and is included as a covariate in the analysis, was compared with a bivariate analysis in which the effect of an SNP was estimated separately for the two measures and univariate association analyses in 9 SNPs that explained greater than 0.001% SBP variance over all 200 GAW18 replicates.The SNP 3_48040283 was significantly associated with SBP in all 200 replicates with the constrained bivariate method providing increased signal over the unconstrained bivariate method. This method improved signal in all 9 SNPs with simulated effects on SBP for nominal significance (p-value <0.05). However, this appears to be determined by the effect size of the SNP on the phenotype. This bivariate association method applied to longitudinal data improves genetic signal for quantitative traits when the effect size of the variant is moderate to large.
纳入时间变化的统计遗传方法有助于更深入地理解影响复杂疾病发展的遗传结构和生物变异的一致性。本研究提出了一种双变量关联方法,用于联合检验来自不同时间点的两个定量表型测量值之间的关联。使用200个模拟的遗传分析研讨会18(GAW18)重复样本,分析了首次和第三次就诊时收缩压(SBP)单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的测量基因型关联。将双变量关联(其中SNP对两种表型平均性状值的影响在两种测量中被约束为相等,并作为协变量纳入分析)与另一种双变量分析(其中分别估计SNP对两种测量的影响)以及对9个SNP的单变量关联分析进行比较,这9个SNP在所有200个GAW18重复样本中解释的SBP方差大于0.001%。在所有200个重复样本中,SNP 3_48040283与SBP显著相关,与无约束双变量方法相比,约束双变量方法提供了更强的信号。对于名义显著性(p值<0.05),该方法在所有9个对SBP有模拟效应的SNP中都增强了信号。然而,这似乎取决于SNP对表型的效应大小。当变异的效应大小为中等至大时,这种应用于纵向数据的双变量关联方法可改善数量性状的遗传信号。