Kang Hye Jin, Wilkins Angela D, Lichtarge Olivier, Wensel Theodore G
From the Graduate Program in Structural and Computational Biology and Molecular Biophysics.
the Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, and.
J Biol Chem. 2015 Jan 30;290(5):2870-8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.622233. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
To determine the structural origins of diverse ligand response specificities among metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), we combined computational approaches with mutagenesis and ligand response assays to identify specificity-determining residues in the group I receptor, mGluR1, and the group III receptors, mGluR4 and mGluR7. Among these, mGluR1 responds to L-glutamate effectively, whereas it binds weakly to another endogenous ligand, L-serine-O-phosphate (L-SOP), which antagonizes the effects of L-glutamate. In contrast, mGluR4 has in common with other group III mGluR that it is activated with higher potency and efficacy by L-SOP. mGluR7 differs from mGluR4 and other group III mGluR in that L-glutamate and L-SOP activate it with low potency and efficacy. Enhanced versions of the evolutionary trace (ET) algorithm were used to identify residues that when swapped between mGluR1 and mGluR4 increased the potency of L-SOP inhibition relative to the potency of L-glutamate activation in mGluR1 mutants and others that diminished the potency/efficacy of L-SOP for mGluR4 mutants. In addition, combining ET identified swaps from mGluR4 with one identified by computational docking produced mGluR7 mutants that respond with dramatically enhanced potency/efficacy to L-SOP. These results reveal that an early functional divergence between group I/II and group III involved variation at positions primarily at allosteric sites located outside of binding pockets, whereas a later divergence within group III occurred through sequence variation both at the ligand-binding pocket and at loops near the dimerization interface and interlobe hinge region. They also demonstrate the power of ET for identifying allosteric determinants of evolutionary importance.
为了确定代谢型谷氨酸受体(mGluRs)之间不同配体反应特异性的结构起源,我们将计算方法与诱变和配体反应测定相结合,以鉴定I组受体mGluR1以及III组受体mGluR4和mGluR7中的特异性决定残基。其中,mGluR1对L-谷氨酸有效响应,而它与另一种内源性配体L-丝氨酸-O-磷酸(L-SOP)的结合较弱,L-SOP可拮抗L-谷氨酸的作用。相比之下,mGluR4与其他III组mGluR的共同之处在于,它被L-SOP以更高的效力和效能激活。mGluR7与mGluR4和其他III组mGluR的不同之处在于,L-谷氨酸和L-SOP以低效力和效能激活它。进化追踪(ET)算法的增强版本用于鉴定在mGluR1和mGluR4之间交换时相对于mGluR1突变体中L-谷氨酸激活效力增加L-SOP抑制效力的残基,以及其他降低mGluR4突变体中L-SOP效力/效能的残基。此外,将ET鉴定的mGluR4的交换与通过计算对接鉴定的一个交换相结合,产生了对L-SOP反应效力/效能显著增强的mGluR7突变体。这些结果表明,I/II组和III组之间的早期功能差异涉及主要位于结合口袋外部变构位点的位置变异,而III组内的后期差异则通过配体结合口袋以及二聚化界面和叶间铰链区域附近环的序列变异发生。它们还证明了ET在鉴定具有进化重要性的变构决定因素方面的能力。