Nancarrow Susan A, Smith Tony, Ariss Steven, Enderby Pamela M
Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, East Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.
Centre for Leadership in Health and Social Care, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Jul;23(4):437-48. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12173. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
Reflective practice is used increasingly to enhance team functioning and service effectiveness; however, there is little evidence of its use in interdisciplinary teams. This paper presents the qualitative evaluation of the Interdisciplinary Management Tool (IMT), an evidence-based change tool designed to enhance interdisciplinary teamwork through structured team reflection. The IMT incorporates three components: an evidence-based resource guide; a reflective implementation framework based on Structured, Facilitated Action Research for Implementation methodology; and formative and summative evaluation components. The IMT was implemented with intermediate care teams supported by independent facilitators in England. Each intervention lasted 6 months and was evaluated over a 12-month period. Data sources include interviews, a focus group with facilitators, questionnaires completed by team members and documentary feedback from structured team reports. Data were analysed qualitatively using the Framework approach. The IMT was implemented with 10 teams, including 253 staff from more than 10 different disciplines. Team challenges included lack of clear vision; communication issues; limited career progression opportunities; inefficient resource use; need for role clarity and service development. The IMT successfully engaged staff in the change process, and resulted in teams developing creative strategies to address the issues identified. Participants valued dedicated time to focus on the processes of team functioning; however, some were uncomfortable with a focus on teamwork at the expense of delivering direct patient care. The IMT is a relatively low-cost, structured, reflective way to enhance team function. It empowers individuals to understand and value their own, and others' roles and responsibilities within the team; identify barriers to effective teamwork, and develop and implement appropriate solutions to these. To be successful, teams need protected time to take for reflection, and executive support to be able to broker changes that are beyond the scope of the team.
反思性实践越来越多地被用于提高团队效能和服务效果;然而,几乎没有证据表明其在跨学科团队中得到应用。本文介绍了对跨学科管理工具(IMT)的定性评估,这是一种基于证据的变革工具,旨在通过结构化的团队反思来加强跨学科团队合作。IMT包含三个组成部分:一个基于证据的资源指南;一个基于结构化、促进性行动研究实施方法的反思性实施框架;以及形成性和总结性评估组件。在英国,IMT由独立的促进者支持,在中级护理团队中实施。每次干预持续6个月,并在12个月的时间内进行评估。数据来源包括访谈、与促进者的焦点小组讨论、团队成员填写的问卷以及结构化团队报告的书面反馈。使用框架方法对数据进行定性分析。IMT在10个团队中实施,包括来自10多个不同学科的253名工作人员。团队面临的挑战包括缺乏明确的愿景;沟通问题;职业晋升机会有限;资源利用效率低下;需要明确角色和服务发展。IMT成功地使工作人员参与到变革过程中,并促使团队制定创造性策略来解决所发现的问题。参与者重视有专门的时间专注于团队运作过程;然而,一些人对以牺牲直接提供患者护理为代价来专注于团队合作感到不舒服。IMT是一种相对低成本、结构化、反思性的提高团队功能的方式。它使个人能够理解并重视自己以及他人在团队中的角色和责任;识别有效团队合作的障碍,并制定和实施针对这些障碍的适当解决方案。要取得成功,团队需要有受保护的反思时间,以及行政支持,以便能够促成超出团队范围的变革。