• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙马拉加大学糖尿病足自我护理问卷(DFSQ-UMA)的编制、验证及心理测量分析

Development, validation and psychometric analysis of the diabetic foot self-care questionnaire of the University of Malaga, Spain (DFSQ-UMA).

作者信息

Navarro-Flores Emmanuel, Morales-Asencio José Miguel, Cervera-Marín José Antonio, Labajos-Manzanares María Teresa, Gijon-Nogueron Gabriel

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Podiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malaga, C/Arquitecto Francisco Peñalosa, Ampliación del Campus de Teatinos, 29071 Málaga, Spain.

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malaga, C/Arquitecto Francisco Peñalosa, Ampliación del Campus de Teatinos, 29071 Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

J Tissue Viability. 2015 Feb;24(1):24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtv.2014.11.001
PMID:25523014
Abstract

This paper assessed the reliability and construct validity of a tool to evaluate the foot self-care of diabetic patients. The education of diabetic patients about their foot care is a major issue to avoid complications like amputations and ulcers. Specific tools aimed to assess patient's knowledge in this area are needed. The study had two phases: in Phase 1, item-generation was carried out through a literature review, expert review by a Delphi technique and cognitive interviews with diabetic patients for testing readability and comprehension. In Phase 2, diabetic patients participated in a cross-sectional study for a psychometric evaluation (reliability and construct validity) was carried out on a sample of type I and II diabetic patients. The study was conducted at the University of Malaga (Spain), podiatric clinics and a Diabetic Foot Unit between October 2012 and March 2013. After psychometric-test analyses on a sample of 209 diabetic patients, the questionnaire resulted in 16 questions. Cronbach's alpha was 0.89 after removing 4 items because of their low reliability. Inter-item correlations gave a mean value of 0.34 (range: 0.06-0.74). The rotated solution showed a 3-factor structure (self-care, foot care, and footwear and socks) that jointly accounted for 60.88% of the variance observed. The correlation between the questionnaire scores and HbA1c was significant and inverse, (r = -0.15; p < 0.01). The findings show that the questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating foot self-care behavior in diabetic patients.

摘要

本文评估了一种用于评估糖尿病患者足部自我护理的工具的信度和结构效度。对糖尿病患者进行足部护理教育是避免截肢和溃疡等并发症的一个主要问题。因此需要有专门的工具来评估患者在这方面的知识。该研究分为两个阶段:在第一阶段,通过文献综述、德尔菲技术专家评审以及对糖尿病患者进行认知访谈以测试可读性和理解性来生成条目。在第二阶段,糖尿病患者参与了一项横断面研究,对I型和II型糖尿病患者样本进行了心理测量学评估(信度和结构效度)。该研究于2012年10月至2013年3月在西班牙马拉加大学、足病诊所和糖尿病足病科进行。在对209名糖尿病患者样本进行心理测量学测试分析后,问卷最终确定为16个问题。由于4个条目的信度较低将其删除后,克朗巴哈系数为0.89。条目间相关性的平均值为0.34(范围:0.06 - 0.74)。旋转后的结果显示出一个三因素结构(自我护理、足部护理以及鞋类和袜子),这三个因素共同解释了所观察到的60.88%的方差。问卷得分与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)之间的相关性显著且呈负相关(r = -0.15;p < 0.01)。研究结果表明,该问卷是评估糖尿病患者足部自我护理行为的有效且可靠的工具。

相似文献

1
Development, validation and psychometric analysis of the diabetic foot self-care questionnaire of the University of Malaga, Spain (DFSQ-UMA).西班牙马拉加大学糖尿病足自我护理问卷(DFSQ-UMA)的编制、验证及心理测量分析
J Tissue Viability. 2015 Feb;24(1):24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the diabetic foot self-care questionnaire in Iranian patients with diabetes.伊朗糖尿病患者中糖尿病足自我护理问卷波斯语版本的心理测量学评估
BMC Endocr Disord. 2021 Apr 17;21(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00734-5.
3
Validity and reliability of the English version of the Diabetic Foot Self-Care Questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation.糖尿病足自我护理问卷英文版的有效性和可靠性:跨文化调适。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 24;11:1326439. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1326439. eCollection 2023.
4
Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the French Version of the Diabetic Foot Self-care Questionnaire of the University of Malaga.《马拉加大学糖尿病足自我护理问卷法语版的跨文化调适与验证》
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2019 Sep;109(5):357-366. doi: 10.7547/17-119.
5
Reliability and validity of the Diabetic foot self-care questionnaire in Turkish patients.土耳其患者糖尿病足自我护理问卷的信度和效度。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2023 Oct;17(5):513-517. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2023.06.005. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
6
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Diabetic Foot Self-Care Questionnaire of the University of Malaga (DFSQUMA).马拉加大学糖尿病足自我护理问卷土耳其语版本(DFSQUMA)的效度和信度
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2023 Oct 31:15347346231209205. doi: 10.1177/15347346231209205.
7
Repeatability and reliability of the diabetic foot self-care questionnaire in Arabic patients: A transcultural adaptation.阿拉伯语糖尿病足自我护理问卷的可重复性和可靠性:跨文化调适。
J Tissue Viability. 2022 Feb;31(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
8
Patient Interpretation of Neuropathy (PIN) questionnaire: an instrument for assessment of cognitive and emotional factors associated with foot self-care.患者对神经病变的理解(PIN)问卷:一种用于评估与足部自我护理相关的认知和情感因素的工具。
Diabetes Care. 2006 Dec;29(12):2617-24. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1550.
9
Validity and reliability of the German translation of the Diabetes Foot Self-Care Behavior Scale (DFSBS-D).糖尿病足自我护理行为量表(DFSBS-D)德语版的信度和效度。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0269395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269395. eCollection 2022.
10
Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire.颅面疼痛与功能障碍量表(CF-PDI):一种新问卷的编制及心理测量学验证
Pain Physician. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):95-108.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Digital Intelligent Interventions on Self-Management of Patients With Diabetic Foot: Systematic Review.数字智能干预对糖尿病足患者自我管理的影响:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 25;27:e64400. doi: 10.2196/64400.
2
Assessing the effectiveness of targeted educational interventions on enhancing self-efficacy and foot care practices among diabetic women in Jordan.评估针对性教育干预措施对提高约旦糖尿病女性自我效能感和足部护理行为的有效性。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;12:1502781. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1502781. eCollection 2024.
3
Validity and reliability of the English version of the Diabetic Foot Self-Care Questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation.
糖尿病足自我护理问卷英文版的有效性和可靠性:跨文化调适。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 24;11:1326439. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1326439. eCollection 2023.
4
Patients' Expectations of Evidence-Based Service at the Pharmacy Regarding Information on Self-Care of the Feet for Persons with Diabetes at Risk of Developing Foot Ulcers - A Cross-Sectional Observational Study in Sweden.关于足部自我护理信息,糖尿病足溃疡高危患者对药房循证服务的期望——瑞典的一项横断面观察研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Dec 27;17:3557-3576. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S435632. eCollection 2023.
5
Evaluation of foot self-care status and foot screening problems in patients with diabetes in Iran: a national multicenter study.伊朗糖尿病患者足部自我护理状况和足部筛查问题评估:一项全国多中心研究。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2023 Aug 21;23(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12902-023-01401-7.
6
Diabetic foot ulcer self-care assessment: a scoping review.糖尿病足溃疡自我护理评估:范围综述。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2023 Aug 7;76(3):e20220555. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0555. eCollection 2023.
7
How to Measure Foot Self-Care? A Methodological Review of Instruments.如何衡量足部自我护理?仪器的方法学综述。
J Pers Med. 2023 Feb 28;13(3):434. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030434.
8
Factors influencing foot care behaviour among patients with diabetes: An integrative literature review.影响糖尿病患者足部护理行为的因素:综合文献回顾。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jul;10(7):4216-4243. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1710. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
9
Measuring Self-management Among People with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Diabetes-Specific Instruments in English and Chinese.测量糖尿病患者的自我管理:英文和中文的患者报告糖尿病专用量表的系统评价。
Adv Ther. 2023 Mar;40(3):769-813. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02361-5. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
10
Self-reported diabetes and quality of life: findings from a general population survey with the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Health Survey.自我报告的糖尿病与生活质量:基于简短健康调查问卷12项版(SF-12)的普通人群调查结果
Arch Med Sci. 2021 Apr 23;18(5):1157-1168. doi: 10.5114/aoms/135797. eCollection 2022.