Awais Muhammad, Nadeem Naila, Husen Yousuf, Rehman Abdul, Beg Madiha, Khattak Yasir Jamil
Department of Radiology, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi.
Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Dec;24(12):889-93.
To compare Greulich-Pyle (GP) and Girdany-Golden (GG) methods for estimation of Skeletal Age (SA) in children referred to a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan.
Cross-sectional study.
Department of Radiology, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from July 2010 to June 2012.
Children up to the age of 18 years, who had undergone X-ray for the evaluation of trauma were included. Each X-ray was interpreted using both methods by two consultant paediatric radiologists having at least 10 years experience, who were blinded to the actual Chronologic Age (CA) of children.
A total of 283 children were included. No significant difference was noted in mean SA estimated by GP method and mean CA for female children (p=0.695). However, a significant difference was noted between mean CA and mean SA by GG method for females (p=0.011). For males, there was a significant difference between mean CA and mean SA estimated by both GP and GG methods. A stronger correlation was found between CA and SA estimated by GP method (r=0.943 for girls, r=0.915 for boys) as compared to GG method (r=0.909 for girls, r=0.865 for boys) respectively. Bland- Altman analysis also revealed that the two methods cannot be used interchangeably. Excellent correlation was seen between the two readers for both GP and GG methods.
There was no additional benefit of using GP and GG methods simultaneously over using GP method alone. Moreover, although GP was reliable in estimating SA in girls, it was unable to accurately assess SA in boys. Therefore, it would be ideal to develop indigenous standards of bone age estimation based on a representative sample of healthy native children.
比较格吕利希-派尔(GP)法和吉尔达尼-戈尔登(GG)法在巴基斯坦卡拉奇一家三级医院就诊儿童中估算骨骼年龄(SA)的情况。
横断面研究。
2010年7月至2012年6月,巴基斯坦卡拉奇阿迦汗大学医院放射科。
纳入18岁及以下因创伤评估接受过X线检查的儿童。由两位至少有10年经验的儿科放射科顾问医生使用两种方法解读每张X线片,他们对儿童的实际 chronological Age(CA)不知情。
共纳入283名儿童。GP法估算的女性儿童平均SA与平均CA之间无显著差异(p = 0.695)。然而,GG法估算的女性儿童平均CA与平均SA之间存在显著差异(p = 0.011)。对于男性,GP法和GG法估算的平均CA与平均SA之间均存在显著差异。与GG法(女孩r = 0.909,男孩r = 0.865)相比,GP法估算的CA与SA之间的相关性更强(女孩r = 0.943,男孩r = 0.915)。布兰德-奥特曼分析还显示,这两种方法不能互换使用。两位读者对GP法和GG法的评估结果相关性都很好。
同时使用GP法和GG法相较于单独使用GP法并无额外益处。此外,尽管GP法在估算女孩的SA方面可靠,但在评估男孩的SA时却不准确。因此,基于健康本地儿童的代表性样本制定本土骨骼年龄估算标准将是理想之选。