Ashmore R
Mental Health Nursing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Apr;22(3):183-91. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12174. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
Section 5(4) (nurse's holding power) of the Mental Health Act 1983 permits nurses of the 'prescribed class' to detain an informal inpatient. The patient must already be receiving treatment for mental disorder. The section lasts for up to 6 h. Section 5(4) is over 30 years old; however, there is relatively little literature exploring its use. Existing literature has limited itself to surveys and audits investigating: nurses' opinions of Section 5(4); nurses' knowledge of Section 5(4); and trends associated with the implementation of Section 5(4). The literature review suggests that what is known about the implementation of Section 5(4) is incomplete. For example, there are no accounts of how and why the holding power is implemented from both a nursing and patient perspective. Section 5(4) (nurse's holding power) of the Mental Health Act 1983 in England and Wales accounts for 10% (n = 1714) of all detentions after admission to hospital. It is followed by further detention in 66% of cases and may require nurses to restrain, seclude or closely observe the patient to prevent them harming themselves and/or others. To conduct a literature review of empirical articles concerning the implementation of Section 5(4), a literature search was undertaken in ASSIA, British Nursing Index, Medline, PsycINFO and Lawtel, using a combination of the keywords 'Section 5(4)', 'nurse's holding powers', 'holding powers', 'Mental Health Act 1983', 'MHA', 'compulsory detention', 'formal detention', 'emergency psychiatric interventions', 'containment interventions' and 'involuntary commitment'. Twenty-five articles were included in the review. Existing literature has focused on surveys and audits investigating: nurses' opinions of Section 5(4); nurses' knowledge of Section 5(4); and trends associated with the implementation of Section 5(4). While this literature has provided some insights into the implementation of Section 5(4), it is clear that what is known about its use is incomplete. Further research is required to examine a number of areas, for example, how and why the section is implemented.
1983年《精神健康法》第5(4)条(护士扣留权)允许“特定级别”的护士拘留非自愿住院患者。患者必须已经在接受精神障碍治疗。该条款有效期最长为6小时。第5(4)条已有30多年历史;然而,探讨其使用情况的文献相对较少。现有文献仅限于调查和审计,调查内容包括:护士对第5(4)条的看法;护士对第5(4)条的了解;以及与第5(4)条实施相关的趋势。文献综述表明,关于第5(4)条实施情况的已知信息并不完整。例如,没有从护士和患者的角度说明扣留权是如何以及为何实施的。在英格兰和威尔士,1983年《精神健康法》第5(4)条(护士扣留权)占入院后所有拘留情况的10%(n = 1714)。在66%的案例中,随后会进行进一步拘留,这可能要求护士对患者进行约束、隔离或密切观察,以防止他们伤害自己和/或他人。为了对有关第5(4)条实施情况的实证文章进行文献综述,在ASSIA、英国护理索引、Medline、PsycINFO和Lawtel中进行了文献检索,使用了“第5(4)条”、“护士扣留权”、“扣留权”、“1983年《精神健康法》”、“MHA”、“强制拘留”、“正式拘留”、“紧急精神科干预”、“控制干预”和“非自愿住院”等关键词的组合。该综述纳入了25篇文章。现有文献侧重于调查和审计,调查内容包括:护士对第5(4)条的看法;护士对第5(4)条的了解;以及与第5(4)条实施相关的趋势。虽然这些文献对第5(4)条的实施提供了一些见解,但很明显,关于其使用的已知信息并不完整。需要进一步研究来考察一些领域,例如,该条款如何以及为何实施。