Salib E
Winwick Hospital, Warrington.
Med Sci Law. 1998 Jul;38(3):227-32. doi: 10.1177/002580249803800308.
Emergency detention of psychiatric patients by doctors under s. 5(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983 is not always preceded by the use of nurses' holding power under s. 5(4). In this review of patients in North Cheshire, all applications of s. 5(4), allowing the emergency detention of voluntary in-patients by registered psychiatric nurses for a maximum period of six hours, were reviewed to examine the extent of its use and to assess its effect on s. 5(2) outcome. Of the 877 detentions under s. 5(2) implemented during the 11-year review period, 140 (16%) were preceded by s. 5(4). There was no significant difference in age, sex, clinical diagnosis, day of the week, reason for detention and length of hospital stay before section application between those who had s. 5(4) applied before 5(2) and those who did not. The latter were less likely to be converted to other sections (53%) compared to a much higher rate of 80% if s. 5(4) preceded s. 5(2). The review has also found that time of section application and length of hospital stay prior to detention may have influenced the use of nurses' holding power. It suggests that s. 5(4) may be a useful predictor of s. 5(2) outcome.
根据1983年《精神健康法》第5(2)条规定,医生对精神病患者进行紧急拘留之前,并不总是先使用第5(4)条规定的护士拘留权。在对北柴郡患者的这项审查中,对所有依据第5(4)条提出的申请进行了审查,该条允许注册精神科护士对自愿住院患者进行最长六小时的紧急拘留,以研究其使用范围,并评估其对第5(2)条实施结果的影响。在为期11年的审查期内实施的877次第5(2)条规定的拘留中,有140次(16%)是在第5(4)条规定的拘留之前进行的。在第5(2)条申请之前接受过第5(4)条规定拘留的患者与未接受过的患者相比,在年龄、性别、临床诊断、星期几、拘留原因以及住院时间等方面,在申请该条款之前没有显著差异。与第5(4)条在第5(2)条之前实施时80%的高转换率相比,后者转为其他条款的可能性较小(53%)。审查还发现,申请该条款的时间以及拘留前的住院时间可能影响了护士拘留权的使用。这表明第5(4)条可能是第5(2)条实施结果的一个有用预测指标。