Versteeg Henneke, Roest Annelieke M, Denollet Johan
Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), Hanzeplein 1, 9173 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Jan-Feb;37(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
To identify the varying courses of anxiety symptoms in the first 18 months after a myocardial infarction (MI) and to examine the importance of personality in determining elevated anxiety.
Four hundred eighty-six MI patients completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory during hospitalization and at 2-, 12- and 18-months post-MI. At baseline, patients also completed the DS14 Type D personality scale, Anxiety Sensitivity Index and Beck Depression Inventory, and clinical and sociodemographic information was collected.
Growth mixture modeling analysis identified four anxiety trajectories. The majority of patients reported stable anxiety scores over time, indicative of either persistent high (17%) or low (71%) anxiety. Patients in the other two smaller groups initially reported moderate levels of anxiety that fluctuated during follow-up. Type D personality [odds ratio (OR)=5.34; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.26-12.63], negative affectivity (OR=3.24; 95% CI: 1.29-8.14) and anxiety sensitivity (OR=3.35; 95% CI: 1.69-6.62) were the most prominent determinants of persistent high anxiety, independent of depression, sociodemographic and clinical factors.
The course of anxiety in the first 18 months after MI is relatively stable for the majority of patients. Patients with Type D personality, negative affectivity and anxiety sensitivity are at an increased risk for persisting elevated anxiety and should be identified and offered appropriate treatment.
确定心肌梗死(MI)后18个月内焦虑症状的不同变化过程,并研究人格因素在决定焦虑水平升高方面的重要性。
486名MI患者在住院期间以及MI后2个月、12个月和18个月时完成了状态-特质焦虑量表。在基线时,患者还完成了DS14 D型人格量表、焦虑敏感性指数和贝克抑郁量表,并收集了临床和社会人口统计学信息。
生长混合模型分析确定了四种焦虑轨迹。大多数患者报告焦虑得分随时间稳定,表明持续高焦虑(17%)或低焦虑(71%)。另外两个较小群体的患者最初报告中度焦虑水平,在随访期间有所波动。D型人格[比值比(OR)=5.34;95%置信区间(CI):2.26 - 12.63]、消极情感性(OR = 3.24;95% CI:1.29 - 8.14)和焦虑敏感性(OR = 3.35;95% CI:1.69 - 6.62)是持续高焦虑的最主要决定因素,独立于抑郁、社会人口统计学和临床因素。
对于大多数患者而言,MI后18个月内焦虑过程相对稳定。D型人格、消极情感性和焦虑敏感性的患者持续焦虑水平升高的风险增加,应予以识别并给予适当治疗。