Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, Health Services & Population Research Department, London, UK.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010 Mar;19(1):1-17. doi: 10.1002/mpr.299.
We evaluated the psychometric properties of the 12-item interviewer-administered screener version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-version II (WHODAS II) among older people living in seven low- and middle-income countries. Principal component analysis (PCA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Mokken analyses were carried out to test for unidimensionality, hierarchical structure, and measurement invariance across 10/66 Dementia Research Group sites. PCA generated a one-factor solution in most sites. In CFA, the two-factor solution generated in Dominican Republic fitted better for all sites other than rural China. The two factors were not easily interpretable, and may have been an artefact of differing item difficulties. Strong internal consistency and high factor loadings for the one-factor solution supported unidimensionality. Furthermore, the WHODAS II was found to be a 'strong' Mokken scale. Measurement invariance was supported by the similarity of factor loadings across sites, and by the high between-site correlations in item difficulties. The Mokken results strongly support that the WHODAS II 12-item screener is a unidimensional and hierarchical scale confirming to item response theory (IRT) principles, at least at the monotone homogeneity model level. More work is needed to assess the generalizability of our findings to different populations.
我们评估了世界卫生组织残疾评估量表第二版(WHODAS II)12 项访谈员管理筛查版本在七个中低收入国家的老年人中的心理测量特性。主成分分析(PCA)、验证性因素分析(CFA)和莫肯分析用于测试一维性、层次结构和在 10/66 痴呆症研究组的 10 个地点的测量不变性。在大多数地点,PCA 生成了一个单因素解决方案。在 CFA 中,在除了中国农村以外的所有地点,多米尼加共和国生成的两因素解决方案更适合。这两个因素不容易解释,可能是由于项目难度不同造成的。单因素解决方案具有很强的内部一致性和高因子负荷,支持了一维性。此外,发现 WHODAS II 是一种“强”莫肯量表。各地点因子负荷的相似性以及项目难度的高站点间相关性支持了测量不变性。莫肯结果强烈支持 WHODAS II 12 项筛查是一个符合项目反应理论(IRT)原则的、至少在单调同质性模型水平上的多维和层次结构的量表。需要做更多的工作来评估我们的发现对不同人群的普遍性。