Decorte Inge, Van Campe Willem, Mostin Laurent, Cay Ann Brigitte, De Regge Nick
Operational Direction Viral Diseases, Enzootic and (Re)emerging Diseases, CODA-CERVA, Ukkel, Belgium (Decorte, Cay, De Regge)Experimental Centre, CODA-CERVA, Machelen, Belgium (Van Campe, Mostin).
Operational Direction Viral Diseases, Enzootic and (Re)emerging Diseases, CODA-CERVA, Ukkel, Belgium (Decorte, Cay, De Regge)Experimental Centre, CODA-CERVA, Machelen, Belgium (Van Campe, Mostin)
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2015 Jan;27(1):47-54. doi: 10.1177/1040638714561252.
There has been a developing interest in the use of oral fluid for the diagnosis of different pathogens such as Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV). PRRSV and PRRSV-specific antibodies have been shown to be present in oral fluid samples, but the correlation between diagnostic results in oral fluid and serum samples has been insufficiently addressed. Studies investigating this correlation focused on boars older than 6 months and type 2 strains, but it is known that the outcome of a PRRSV infection is age and strain dependent. To address this gap, the current study reports on the detection of PRRSV and PRRSV-specific antibodies in serum and oral fluid samples collected over a 6-week period after an experimental infection of 8-week-old individually housed pigs with Lelystad virus, the type 1 prototype strain. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis showed that significantly more serum samples were PRRSV RNA-positive than oral fluid until 5 days postinfection (dpi). Between 7 and 21 dpi, PRRSV RNA detection was similar in both samples but higher detection rates in oral fluid were found from 28 dpi. Compared with existing literature, this highlights that detection rates at particular time points postinfection might vary in function of strain virulence and animal age and provides useful information for the interpretation of pen-based oral fluid results. An excellent agreement between the oral fluid and serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results was observed at every time point, further supporting the usefulness of oral fluid as a diagnostic sample for antibody detection.
人们对使用口腔液诊断不同病原体(如猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒,PRRSV)的兴趣日益浓厚。PRRSV及PRRSV特异性抗体已在口腔液样本中被检测到,但口腔液与血清样本诊断结果之间的相关性尚未得到充分研究。此前研究这种相关性的实验主要聚焦于6月龄以上的公猪以及2型毒株,但已知PRRSV感染的结果取决于年龄和毒株类型。为填补这一空白,本研究报告了在8周龄单独饲养的仔猪经莱利斯塔德病毒(1型原型毒株)实验性感染后6周内采集的血清和口腔液样本中PRRSV及PRRSV特异性抗体的检测情况。定量逆转录聚合酶链反应分析显示,在感染后5天(dpi)之前,血清样本中PRRSV RNA阳性的数量显著多于口腔液样本。在7至21 dpi之间,两个样本中的PRRSV RNA检测情况相似,但从28 dpi开始,口腔液样本中的检测率更高。与现有文献相比,这突出表明感染后特定时间点的检测率可能因毒株毒力和动物年龄而异,并为基于栏舍的口腔液检测结果解读提供了有用信息。在每个时间点,口腔液和血清酶联免疫吸附测定结果之间都表现出极佳的一致性,进一步证明了口腔液作为抗体检测诊断样本的实用性。