Ali Mohammad Javed, Psaltis Alkis James, Wormald Peter John
Dacryology Service, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Department of Surgery-Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec 9;8:2491-9. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S73998. eCollection 2014.
This study aims to provide a systematic protocol for the evaluation of a dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) ostium and to propose a scoring system to standardize the assessment.
Retrospective evaluation of 125 consecutive lacrimal ostia post-DCR was performed. Medical records were screened, and photographs and videos were assessed to note the details of various ostial parameters. The major time points in evaluation were 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-DCR. The ostia were defined and parameters like shape, size, location, and evolution of ostium were noted. Evaluation parameters were defined for internal common opening (ICO), ostium stents, and ostium granulomas. Ostium cicatrix and synechiae were graded based on their significance. Surgical success rates were computed and ostium characteristics in failed cases were studied.
A total of 125 ostia were evaluated on the aforementioned ostium parameters. Because five ostia showed a complete cicatricial closure with no recognizable features, the remaining 120 ostia were studied. The ostium location was anterior to the axilla of middle turbinate in 85.8% (103/120) of the cases. Moreover, 76.6% (92/120) of the ostia were circular to oval in shape, with a shallow base. The ostium size was >8×5 mm in 78.3% (94/120) of the cases. The ICO was found to be located in the central or paracentral basal area in 75.8% (91/120). The anatomical and functional success rates achieved were 96% and 93.6%, respectively. All the five cases with anatomical failures showed a complete cicatrization and the ICO movements were poor in all the three cases of functional failure.
The article attempts to standardize the postoperative evaluation of a DCR ostium and provides a systematic protocol and scoring system for possible use by surgeons and researchers alike.
本研究旨在提供一种评估泪囊鼻腔吻合术(DCR)造口的系统方案,并提出一种评分系统以规范评估。
对125例连续的DCR术后泪道造口进行回顾性评估。筛查病历,并评估照片和视频以记录各种造口参数的细节。评估的主要时间点为DCR术后4周、6周、3个月和6个月。对造口进行定义,并记录造口的形状、大小、位置和演变等参数。为内共同开口(ICO)、造口支架和造口肉芽肿定义了评估参数。根据造口瘢痕和粘连的严重程度进行分级。计算手术成功率,并研究失败病例的造口特征。
根据上述造口参数对总共125个造口进行了评估。由于5个造口显示完全瘢痕性闭合且无明显特征,因此对其余120个造口进行了研究。85.8%(103/120)的病例造口位于中鼻甲腋前线前方。此外,76.6%(92/120)的造口形状为圆形至圆形圆形至椭圆形,底部较浅。78.3%(94/120)的病例造口大小>8×5mm。发现75.8%(91/120)的ICO位于中央或中央旁基底区域。解剖学成功率和功能成功率分别为96%和93.6%。所有5例解剖学失败的病例均显示完全瘢痕化,3例功能失败的病例中ICO活动均较差。
本文试图规范DCR造口的术后评估,并提供一种系统方案和评分系统,供外科医生和研究人员使用。