• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于依从性的简短多因素干预在降低血压方面的疗效:一项随机临床试验。

Efficacy of a brief multifactorial adherence-based intervention in reducing blood pressure: a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Leiva Alfonso, Aguiló Antonio, Fajó-Pascual Marta, Moreno Lucia, Martín M Carmen, Garcia Elena Marina, Duro Rosa Elena, Serra Francisca, Dagosto Pilar, Iglesias-Iglesias Ana Aurelia, Company Rosa Maria, Yañez Aina, Llobera Joan

机构信息

Primary Care Research Unit of Mallorca, Baleares Health Services-IbSalut, Mallorca, Spain.

Research Group on Evidence, Lifestyles and Health, Universitat Illes Balears, Palma, Spain.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Dec 5;8:1683-90. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S66927. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S66927
PMID:25525344
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4266385/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lowering blood pressure (BP) by antihypertensive (AHT) drugs reduces the risks of cardiovascular events, stroke, and total mortality. However, poor adherence to AHT medications reduces their effectiveness and increases the risk of adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a multifactorial adherence-based intervention in a primary care setting in lowering BP.

METHODS/DESIGN: Multicenter parallel randomized controlled trial. Thirty two nurses in 28 primary care centers of three Spanish regions. Patients aged 18-80 years, taking AHT drugs with uncontrolled BP (n=221) were randomized to a control group (usual care) or a multifactorial adherence-based intervention including nurse-led motivational interviews, pill reminders, family support, BP self-recording, and simplification of the dosing regimen by a pharmacist.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was 12-month blinded measure of systolic BP (mean of three measurements). The secondary outcomes were 12-month diastolic BP and proportion of patients with adequately controlled BP.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen patients were allocated to the intervention group and 109 to the control group. At 12 months, 212 (89%) participants completed the study. The systolic BP in the intervention group was 151.3 versus 153.7 in the control group (P=0.294). The diastolic BP did not differ between groups (83.4 versus 83.6). Of the patients in the control group, 9.2% achieved BP control versus a 15.8% in the intervention group. The relative risk for achieving BP control was 1.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.83-3.56).

CONCLUSION

A multifactorial intervention based on improving adherence in patients with uncontrolled hypertension failed to find evidence of effectiveness in lowering systolic BP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN21229328.

摘要

背景

使用抗高血压(AHT)药物降低血压可降低心血管事件、中风和全因死亡率的风险。然而,对AHT药物的依从性差会降低其疗效并增加不良事件的风险。

目的

评估在初级保健环境中基于多因素依从性的干预措施降低血压的有效性。

方法/设计:多中心平行随机对照试验。西班牙三个地区28个初级保健中心的32名护士。年龄在18 - 80岁、服用AHT药物但血压未得到控制的患者(n = 221)被随机分为对照组(常规护理)或基于多因素依从性的干预组,该干预包括护士主导的动机性访谈、服药提醒、家庭支持、血压自我记录以及药剂师简化给药方案。

主要观察指标

主要结局是12个月时收缩压的盲法测量值(三次测量的平均值)。次要结局是12个月时的舒张压以及血压得到充分控制的患者比例。

结果

114名患者被分配到干预组,109名患者被分配到对照组。12个月时,212名(89%)参与者完成了研究。干预组的收缩压为151.3,而对照组为153.7(P = 0.294)。两组之间的舒张压无差异(83.4对83.6)。对照组中9.2%的患者实现了血压控制,而干预组为15.8%。实现血压控制的相对风险为1.72(95%置信区间:0.83 - 3.56)。

结论

基于改善未控制高血压患者依从性的多因素干预未能找到降低收缩压有效性的证据。

试验注册

ISRCTN21229328

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcd4/4266385/6540be5bb3b8/ppa-8-1683Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcd4/4266385/6540be5bb3b8/ppa-8-1683Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcd4/4266385/6540be5bb3b8/ppa-8-1683Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of a brief multifactorial adherence-based intervention in reducing blood pressure: a randomized clinical trial.基于依从性的简短多因素干预在降低血压方面的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Dec 5;8:1683-90. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S66927. eCollection 2014.
2
Efficacy of a brief multifactorial adherence-based intervention on reducing the blood pressure of patients with poor adherence: protocol for a randomized clinical trial.基于简短的多因素依从性干预降低依从性差的患者血压的效果:一项随机临床试验方案。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2010 Sep 27;10:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-10-44.
3
Fixed Low-Dose Triple Combination Antihypertensive Medication vs Usual Care for Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension in Sri Lanka: A Randomized Clinical Trial.固定低剂量三联抗高血压药物与常规护理治疗斯里兰卡轻中度高血压患者的血压控制:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 14;320(6):566-579. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.10359.
4
A multifaceted pharmacist intervention to improve antihypertensive adherence: a cluster-randomized, controlled trial (HAPPy trial).一项改善抗高血压依从性的多方面药师干预措施:一项整群随机对照试验(HAPPy试验)。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2014 Oct;39(5):527-34. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12185. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
5
Effect of a Community Health Worker-Led Multicomponent Intervention on Blood Pressure Control in Low-Income Patients in Argentina: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社区卫生工作者主导的多组分干预对阿根廷低收入患者血压控制的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2017 Sep 19;318(11):1016-1025. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11358.
6
Effect of fixed dose combination treatment on adherence and risk factor control among patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: randomised controlled trial in primary care.固定剂量联合治疗对心血管疾病高危患者依从性和危险因素控制的影响:初级保健中的随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2014 May 27;348:g3318. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3318.
7
Long-term Outcomes of the Effects of Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Management on Blood Pressure Among Adults With Uncontrolled Hypertension: Follow-up of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.家庭血压远程监测和药师管理对血压控制不佳的成年人血压影响的长期结果:一项集群随机临床试验的随访。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e181617. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1617.
8
Team-based care for improving hypertension management among outpatients (TBC-HTA): study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.基于团队的门诊高血压管理护理(TBC-HTA):一项实用随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0472-y.
9
Management of hypertension and multiple risk factors to enhance cardiovascular health - a feasibility study in Singapore polyclinics.管理高血压和多种风险因素以促进心血管健康——新加坡综合诊疗所的一项可行性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 8;16:229. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1491-6.
10
Effect of a pharmacy care program on medication adherence and persistence, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a randomized controlled trial.一项药学服务项目对药物依从性、持续性、血压及低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的影响:一项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2006 Dec 6;296(21):2563-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.21.joc60162. Epub 2006 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Medication Adherence and Contributing Factors in Patients with Heart Failure Within the Middle East: A Systematic Review.中东地区心力衰竭患者的药物依从性及影响因素:一项系统评价
Glob Heart. 2025 May 27;20(1):47. doi: 10.5334/gh.1431. eCollection 2025.
2
Pharmacists delivering hypertension care services: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.提供高血压护理服务的药剂师:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Mar 14;12:1477729. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1477729. eCollection 2025.
3
The short and long-term efficacy of nurse-led interventions for improving blood pressure control in people with hypertension in primary care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Simplified therapeutic intervention to control hypertension and hypercholesterolemia: a cluster randomized controlled trial (STITCH2).简化降压降脂治疗干预以控制高血压和高胆固醇血症:一项整群随机对照试验(STITCH2)。
J Hypertens. 2013 Aug;31(8):1702-13. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283619d6a.
2
[Proposals for social class classification based on the Spanish National Classification of Occupations 2011 using neo-Weberian and neo-Marxist approaches].[基于2011年西班牙国家职业分类采用新韦伯主义和新马克思主义方法进行社会阶层分类的提议]
Gac Sanit. 2013 May-Jun;27(3):263-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
3
在基层医疗环境中,由护士主导的干预措施对改善高血压患者血压控制的短期和长期疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Apr 27;25(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02380-x.
4
Health Techequity: Opportunities for Digital Health Innovations to Improve Equity and Diversity in Cardiovascular Care.健康技术公平性:数字健康创新改善心血管护理公平性和多样性的机遇。
Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2023;17(1):1-20. doi: 10.1007/s12170-022-00711-0. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
5
The effect of integrated health care in patients with hypertension and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高血压合并糖尿病患者的综合医疗效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 5;22(1):603. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07838-1.
6
Effectiveness of nursing case management versus usual care for blood pressure control in adults with hypertension: a systematic review.护理病例管理与常规护理对高血压成人血压控制效果的系统评价。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2021 Feb;39(1). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v39n1e04.
7
A clinical trial on the effect of a multifaceted intervention on blood pressure control and medication adherence in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.一项关于多方面干预对血压控制不佳的高血压患者血压控制和药物依从性影响的临床试验。
ARYA Atheroscler. 2019 Nov;15(6):267-274. doi: 10.22122/arya.v15i6.1904.
8
Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure in Patients With Hypertension-Related Multi-morbidity: Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.高血压相关多病种患者的血压自我监测:系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Am J Hypertens. 2020 Mar 13;33(3):243-251. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpz182.
9
Effect of motivational interviewing in hypertensive patients (MIdNIgHT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.动机性访谈对高血压患者的影响(MIdNIgHT):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Jul 9;20(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3486-1.
10
Self-monitoring of blood pressure in hypertension: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.高血压患者的血压自我监测:一项系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2017 Sep 19;14(9):e1002389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002389. eCollection 2017 Sep.
What determines the duration of patient medication compliance in patients with chronic disease: are we looking in the wrong place?
是什么决定了慢性病患者的用药依从性时长:我们找错方向了吗?
South Med Rev. 2011 Dec;4(2):97-101. doi: 10.5655/smr.v4i2.1008. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
4
A multifactorial intervention to improve blood pressure control in co-existing diabetes and kidney disease: a feasibility randomized controlled trial.一项多因素干预措施改善同时存在糖尿病和肾脏疾病患者的血压控制:一项可行性随机对照试验。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Nov;68(11):2515-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.05950.x. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
5
[Relative validity of the 10-year cardiovascular risk estimate in a population cohort of the REGICOR study].[REGICOR研究人群队列中10年心血管疾病风险评估的相对有效性]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011 May;64(5):385-94. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2010.12.011. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
6
Adherence and persistence with taking medication to control high blood pressure.高血压控制药物治疗的依从性和持续性。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2011 Jan-Feb;5(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2011.01.001.
7
Randomized pilot study of a behavioral feedback intervention to improve medication adherence in older adults with hypertension.随机先导性研究:行为反馈干预改善老年高血压患者药物依从性
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(6):470-9. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181d5f9c5.
8
Multicenter cluster-randomized trial of a multifactorial intervention to improve antihypertensive medication adherence and blood pressure control among patients at high cardiovascular risk (the COM99 study).多中心整群随机对照试验,针对具有较高心血管风险的患者,实施多因素干预措施以提高抗高血压药物治疗依从性和血压控制水平(COM99 研究)。
Circulation. 2010 Sep 21;122(12):1183-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.892778. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
9
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010 声明:平行组随机试验报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
10
Adherence to antihypertensive medications and cardiovascular morbidity among newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.新诊断高血压患者的降压药物依从性与心血管疾病发病率
Circulation. 2009 Oct 20;120(16):1598-605. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.830299. Epub 2009 Oct 5.