Hong Jae-Seok, Kang Hee-Chung
From the Research Department, Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (J-SH); and Health Security Research Division, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Seoul, Republic of Korea (H-CK).
Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Dec;93(28):e287. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000287.
Issues regarding healthcare disparity continue to increase in connection with access to quality care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), even though the case-fatality rate (CFR) continues to decrease. We explored regional variation in AMI CFRs and examined whether the variation was due to disparities in access to quality medical services for AMI patients. A dataset was constructed from the Korea National Health Insurance Claims Database to conduct a retrospective cohort study of 95,616 patients who were admitted to a hospital in Korea from 2003 to 2007 with AMI. Each patient was followed in the claims database for information about treatment after admission or death. The procedure rate decreased as the region went "down" from Seoul to the county level, whereas the AMI CFR increased as the county level as a function of proximity to the county level (30-day AMI CFRs: Seoul, 16.4%; metropolitan areas, 16.2%, cities; 18.8%, counties, 39.4%). Even after adjusting for covariates, an identical regional variation in the odds of patients receiving treatment services and dying was identified. After adjusting for invasive and medical management variables in addition to earlier covariates, the death risk in the counties remained statistically significantly higher than in Seoul; however, the degree of the difference decreased greatly and the significant differences in metropolitan areas and cities disappeared. Policy interventions are needed to increase access to quality AMI care in county-level local areas because regional differences in the AMI CFR are likely caused by differences in the performance of medical and invasive management among the regions of Korea. Additionally, a public education program to increase the awareness of early symptoms and the necessity of visiting the hospital early should be established as the first priority to improve the outcome of AMI patents, especially in county-level local areas.
尽管急性心肌梗死(AMI)的病死率(CFR)持续下降,但与获得高质量急性心肌梗死治疗相关的医疗保健差异问题仍在不断增加。我们探讨了急性心肌梗死病死率的地区差异,并研究了这种差异是否是由于急性心肌梗死患者获得优质医疗服务的机会不平等所致。我们从韩国国民健康保险索赔数据库构建了一个数据集,对2003年至2007年在韩国医院住院的95616例急性心肌梗死患者进行回顾性队列研究。在索赔数据库中对每位患者进行随访,以获取入院后治疗或死亡的信息。随着地区从首尔到县级“降低”,治疗率下降,而急性心肌梗死病死率则随着县级的降低而增加(30天急性心肌梗死病死率:首尔,16.4%;大城市地区,16.2%,城市;18.8%,县,39.4%)。即使在调整协变量后,仍发现患者接受治疗服务和死亡几率存在相同的地区差异。在除早期协变量外还调整了侵入性和药物管理变量后,县内的死亡风险在统计学上仍显著高于首尔;然而,差异程度大幅下降,大城市地区和城市的显著差异消失。由于韩国各地区急性心肌梗死病死率的地区差异可能是由医疗和侵入性管理表现的差异引起的,因此需要采取政策干预措施,以增加县级地区获得优质急性心肌梗死治疗的机会。此外,应将提高对早期症状的认识以及尽早就诊必要性的公众教育计划作为首要任务来制定,以改善急性心肌梗死患者的治疗结果,特别是在县级地区。