Saint Luke's Mid America Heart and Vascular Institute, 4401 Wornall Rd, Fifth Floor, Kansas City, MO 64111, USA.
JAMA. 2011 Jul 6;306(1):53-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.916.
Despite the widespread use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the appropriateness of these procedures in contemporary practice is unknown.
To assess the appropriateness of PCI in the United States.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Multicenter, prospective study of patients within the National Cardiovascular Data Registry undergoing PCI between July 1, 2009, and September 30, 2010, at 1091 US hospitals. The appropriateness of PCI was adjudicated using the appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization. Results were stratified by whether the procedure was performed for an acute (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or unstable angina with high-risk features) or nonacute indication.
Proportion of acute and nonacute PCIs classified as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate; extent of hospital-level variation in inappropriate procedures.
Of 500,154 PCIs, 355,417 (71.1%) were for acute indications (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 103,245 [20.6%]; non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 105,708 [21.1%]; high-risk unstable angina, 146,464 [29.3%]), and 144,737 (28.9%) for nonacute indications. For acute indications, 350,469 PCIs (98.6%) were classified as appropriate, 1055 (0.3%) as uncertain, and 3893 (1.1%) as inappropriate. For nonacute indications, 72,911 PCIs (50.4%) were classified as appropriate, 54,988 (38.0%) as uncertain, and 16,838 (11.6%) as inappropriate. The majority of inappropriate PCIs for nonacute indications were performed in patients with no angina (53.8%), low-risk ischemia on noninvasive stress testing (71.6%), or suboptimal (≤1 medication) antianginal therapy (95.8%). Furthermore, although variation in the proportion of inappropriate PCI across hospitals was minimal for acute procedures, there was substantial hospital variation for nonacute procedures (median hospital rate for inappropriate PCI, 10.8%; interquartile range, 6.0%-16.7%).
In this large contemporary US cohort, nearly all acute PCIs were classified as appropriate. For nonacute indications, however, 12% were classified as inappropriate, with substantial variation across hospitals.
尽管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)已广泛应用,但目前尚不清楚在当代实践中这些治疗方法的适宜性。
评估美国 PCI 的适宜性。
设计、地点和患者:这是一项多中心前瞻性研究,纳入了 2009 年 7 月 1 日至 2010 年 9 月 30 日期间在 1091 家美国医院接受 PCI 的患者。使用冠状动脉血运重建的适宜性标准对 PCI 的适宜性进行了判定。结果按照治疗的急性(ST 段抬高型心肌梗死、非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死或高危特征不稳定型心绞痛)或非急性适应证进行分层。
急性和非急性 PCI 中被归类为适宜、不确定或不适宜的比例;医院间不适当手术的程度差异。
在 500154 例 PCI 中,355417 例(71.1%)为急性适应证(ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 103245 例[20.6%];非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 105708 例[21.1%];高危不稳定型心绞痛 146464 例[29.3%]),144737 例(28.9%)为非急性适应证。对于急性适应证,350469 例 PCI(98.6%)被归类为适宜,1055 例(0.3%)为不确定,3893 例(1.1%)为不适宜。对于非急性适应证,72911 例 PCI(50.4%)被归类为适宜,54988 例(38.0%)为不确定,16838 例(11.6%)为不适宜。非急性适应证中大多数不适当的 PCI 是在无心绞痛(53.8%)、非侵入性压力测试低风险缺血(71.6%)或抗心绞痛药物治疗不佳(≤1 种药物)(95.8%)的患者中进行的。此外,尽管急性手术的不适当 PCI 比例在医院间差异很小,但非急性手术的医院间差异很大(不适当 PCI 的中位数医院发生率为 10.8%;四分位间距为 6.0%-16.7%)。
在这项美国的大型当代队列研究中,几乎所有急性 PCI 都被归类为适宜。然而,对于非急性适应证,12%被归类为不适宜,且各医院之间存在很大差异。