Helman S, Reed N
Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne House, Nine Mile Ride, Wokingham, Berkshire RG40 3GA, UK.
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Feb;75:245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.12.008. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
Data from two previously published studies were used to examine the correlations between scores on the violation, error and lapse sub-scales of the driver behaviour questionnaire, and observed driving speed. One dataset utilised data from an instrumented vehicle, which recorded driver speed on bends on a rural road. The other utilised data from a driving simulator study. Generally in both datasets the DBQ violation subscale was associated with objectively-measured speed, while the error and lapse sub-scales were not. These findings are consistent with the idea that the DBQ is a valid measure of observed behaviour in real driving (its original intended use) and also in simulated driving. The fact that associations were the same in real and simulated driving lends further support to the relative validity of driving simulation. The need for larger and more focused studies examining the role of different motivations in different driving situations is discussed.
来自两项先前发表的研究的数据被用于检验驾驶员行为问卷中违规、失误和疏忽子量表的得分与观察到的驾驶速度之间的相关性。一个数据集使用了来自一辆装备有仪器的车辆的数据,该车辆记录了乡村道路弯道上的驾驶员速度。另一个数据集使用了来自驾驶模拟器研究的数据。总体而言,在这两个数据集中,驾驶员行为问卷的违规子量表都与客观测量的速度相关,而失误和疏忽子量表则不然。这些发现与以下观点一致,即驾驶员行为问卷是对实际驾驶(其最初预期用途)以及模拟驾驶中观察到的行为的有效测量。在实际驾驶和模拟驾驶中关联相同这一事实进一步支持了驾驶模拟的相对有效性。文中讨论了开展规模更大、更具针对性的研究以考察不同动机在不同驾驶情境中的作用的必要性。