• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻人危险驾驶中的冲动与自我调节过程:一种双过程模型。

Impulsive and Self-Regulatory Processes in Risky Driving Among Young People: A Dual Process Model.

作者信息

Lazuras Lambros, Rowe Richard, Poulter Damian R, Powell Philip A, Ypsilanti Antonia

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Sociology and Politics, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Department of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 12;10:1170. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01170. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01170
PMID:31244705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6581758/
Abstract

The present study empirically examined a novel dual process model of self-reported aberrant driving behavior in young and novice drivers that incorporates both impulsive and self-regulatory processes. Four hundred and nine participants aged 18-25 years ( age = 21.18 years, = 2.12; 65.5% females) completed online questionnaires on impulsivity, normlessness, sensation seeking, emotion and self-regulation, and attitudes toward driving safety. Path analysis showed that motor impulsivity was associated with self-reported driving violations, errors, and lapses, whereas sensation seeking was uniquely directly associated with self-reported errors. Non-planning impulsivity, normlessness and sensation seeking had significant indirect effects on self-reported errors, via self-regulation. Finally, motor impulsivity and normlessness had a significant indirect effect on self-reported violations, errors and lapses, via attitudes to driving safety. Based on our findings we suggest that a dual-process approach is relevant to the study of aberrant driving behavior in young and novice drivers, and the results of the present study have important implications for initiatives to promote driving safety in this population.

摘要

本研究通过实证检验了一个关于年轻和新手驾驶员自我报告的异常驾驶行为的新型双过程模型,该模型纳入了冲动和自我调节过程。409名年龄在18 - 25岁之间的参与者(年龄 = 21.18岁,标准差 = 2.12;65.5%为女性)完成了关于冲动性、无规范感、寻求刺激、情绪和自我调节以及对驾驶安全态度的在线问卷。路径分析表明,运动冲动性与自我报告的驾驶违规、失误和差错相关,而寻求刺激则独特地直接与自我报告的失误相关。非计划性冲动、无规范感和寻求刺激通过自我调节对自我报告的失误有显著的间接影响。最后,运动冲动性和无规范感通过对驾驶安全的态度对自我报告的违规、失误和差错有显著的间接影响。基于我们的研究结果,我们认为双过程方法与年轻和新手驾驶员异常驾驶行为的研究相关,并且本研究结果对促进该人群驾驶安全的举措具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Impulsive and Self-Regulatory Processes in Risky Driving Among Young People: A Dual Process Model.年轻人危险驾驶中的冲动与自我调节过程:一种双过程模型。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 12;10:1170. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01170. eCollection 2019.
2
Impulsivity and self-regulation: A dual-process model of risky driving in young drivers in Iran.冲动性和自我调节:伊朗年轻驾驶员危险驾驶的双过程模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Jul;187:107055. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107055. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
3
Crash risk and aberrant driving behaviors among bus drivers: the role of personality and attitudes towards traffic safety.公交车司机碰撞风险与异常驾驶行为:个性和交通安全态度的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jun;79:145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.034. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
4
Personality Traits and Attitudes Toward Traffic Safety Predict Risky Behavior Across Young, Adult, and Older Drivers.人格特质与交通安全态度对年轻、成年及老年驾驶员的危险行为具有预测作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 11;10:536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00536. eCollection 2019.
5
Young novice driver subtypes: relationship to driving violations, errors and lapses.年轻新手驾驶员亚型:与驾驶违法行为、失误和疏忽的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1689-96. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 May 15.
6
Effects of personality on risky driving behavior and accident involvement for Chinese drivers.个性对中国驾驶员冒险驾驶行为和事故参与的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(6):565-71. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.748903.
7
Personality and attitudes as predictors of risky driving among older drivers.个性与态度对老年驾驶员危险驾驶行为的预测作用
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:318-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.022. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
8
The influence of sensitivity to reward and punishment, propensity for sensation seeking, depression, and anxiety on the risky behaviour of novice drivers: a path model.奖励和惩罚敏感性、寻求刺激倾向、抑郁和焦虑对新手驾驶员冒险行为的影响:路径模型。
Br J Psychol. 2012 May;103(2):248-67. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02069.x. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
9
Difficulties in emotion regulation and risky driving among Lithuanian drivers.立陶宛驾驶员的情绪调节困难与危险驾驶
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Oct 3;18(7):688-693. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1315109. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
10
Relationships between thrill seeking, speeding attitudes, and driving violations among a sample of motorsports spectators and drivers.赛车运动观众和车手样本中寻求刺激、超速态度与驾驶违规行为之间的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jan;86:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.014. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalizing driver safety interfaces via driver cognitive factors inference.通过驾驶员认知因素推断实现驾驶员安全界面的个性化。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 5;14(1):18058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65144-8.
2
Relationship between Moral Values for Driving Behavior and Brain Activity: An NIRS Study.驾驶行为的道德价值观与大脑活动之间的关系:一项近红外光谱研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;10(11):2221. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112221.
3
Effectiveness of text message interventions with different behavior change techniques on alcohol consumption among young adults: a five-arm randomized controlled trial.短信干预措施对年轻人饮酒行为的影响:一项五臂随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2023 Feb;118(2):265-275. doi: 10.1111/add.16074. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
4
Effectiveness of a Text Message Intervention Promoting Seat Belt Use Among Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.短信干预措施在促进年轻成年人使用安全带方面的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231616. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31616.

本文引用的文献

1
The association between sensation seeking and driving outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.感觉寻求与驾驶行为后果的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Feb;123:222-234. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
2
The Insidious Number Two.隐匿的二号
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Aug;22(8):668-669. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
3
The Mythical Number Two.二的神话。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;22(4):280-293. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
4
Thrill and adventure seeking in risky driving at work: The moderating role of safety climate.工作中危险驾驶的刺激与冒险寻求:安全氛围的调节作用。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
5
Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement.驾驶失误、交通违规及事故参与情况。
Ergonomics. 1995 May;38(5):1036-1048. doi: 10.1080/00140139508925170.
6
Aggression, emotional self-regulation, attentional bias, and cognitive inhibition predict risky driving behavior.攻击性、情绪自我调节、注意力偏向和认知抑制预测冒险驾驶行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Dec;109:78-88. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
7
Executive functions and the self-regulation of eating behavior: A review.执行功能与饮食行为的自我调节:综述。
Appetite. 2018 May 1;124:4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.041. Epub 2017 May 25.
8
An examination of the relationship between measures of impulsivity and risky simulated driving amongst young drivers.对年轻驾驶员冲动性测量与危险模拟驾驶之间关系的一项研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jun;103:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
9
Around the world, adolescence is a time of heightened sensation seeking and immature self-regulation.在全球范围内,青春期是一个高度寻求刺激和不成熟自我调节的时期。
Dev Sci. 2018 Mar;21(2). doi: 10.1111/desc.12532. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
Annual Research Review: On the relations among self-regulation, self-control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk-taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology.年度研究综述:关于自我调节、自我控制、执行功能、努力控制、认知控制、冲动性、冒险行为以及抑制在发展性精神病理学中的关系
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;58(4):361-383. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12675. Epub 2016 Dec 30.