Suppr超能文献

慢性髓性白血病异基因移植采用环磷酰胺联合静脉注射白消安、口服白消安或全身照射的疗效比较。

Comparison of outcomes of allogeneic transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia with cyclophosphamide in combination with intravenous busulfan, oral busulfan, or total body irradiation.

作者信息

Copelan Edward A, Avalos Belinda R, Ahn Kwang Woo, Zhu Xiaochun, Gale Robert Peter, Grunwald Michael R, Hamadani Mehdi, Hamilton Betty K, Hale Gregory A, Marks David I, Waller Edmund K, Savani Bipin N, Costa Luciano J, Ramanathan Muthalagu, Cahn Jean-Yves, Khoury H Jean, Weisdorf Daniel J, Inamoto Yoshihiro, Kamble Rammurti T, Schouten Harry C, Wirk Baldeep, Litzow Mark R, Aljurf Mahmoud D, van Besien Koen W, Ustun Celalettin, Bolwell Brian J, Bredeson Christopher N, Fasan Omotayo, Ghosh Nilanjan, Horowitz Mary M, Arora Mukta, Szer Jeffrey, Loren Alison W, Alyea Edwin P, Cortes Jorge, Maziarz Richard T, Kalaycio Matt E, Saber Wael

机构信息

Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, North Carolina.

Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, North Carolina.

出版信息

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Mar;21(3):552-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.12.010. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

Abstract

Cyclophosphamide (Cy) in combination with busulfan (Bu) or total body irradiation (TBI) is the most commonly used myeloablative conditioning regimen in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). We used data from the Center for International Bone Marrow Transplantation Research to compare outcomes in adults who underwent hematopoietic cell transplantation for CML in first chronic phase after myeloablative conditioning with Cy in combination with TBI, oral Bu, or intravenous (i.v.) Bu. Four hundred thirty-eight adults received human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling grafts and 235 received well-matched grafts from unrelated donors (URD) from 2000 through 2006. Important differences existed between the groups in distribution of donor relation, exposure to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and year of transplantation. In multivariate analysis, relapse occurred less frequently among patients receiving i.v. Bu compared with TBI (relative risk [RR], .36; P = .022) or oral Bu (RR, .39; P = .028), but nonrelapse mortality and survival were similar. A significant interaction was detected between donor relation and the main effect in leukemia-free survival (LFS). Among recipients of HLA-identical sibling grafts, but not URD grafts, LFS was better in patients receiving i.v. Bu (RR, .53; P = .025) or oral Bu (RR, .64; P = .017) compared with TBI. In CML in first chronic phase, Cy in combination with i.v. Bu was associated with less relapse than TBI or oral Bu. LFS was better after i.v. or oral Bu compared with TBI.

摘要

环磷酰胺(Cy)联合白消安(Bu)或全身照射(TBI)是慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者最常用的清髓性预处理方案。我们利用国际骨髓移植研究中心的数据,比较了在接受Cy联合TBI、口服Bu或静脉注射(i.v.)Bu进行清髓性预处理后处于慢性期的成年CML患者接受造血细胞移植的结局。从2000年到2006年,438名成年人接受了人类白细胞抗原(HLA)匹配的同胞供体移植,235名接受了来自无关供体(URD)的匹配良好的移植。各组在供体关系分布、酪氨酸激酶抑制剂暴露情况和移植年份方面存在重要差异。在多变量分析中,与接受TBI(相对风险[RR],0.36;P = 0.022)或口服Bu(RR,0.39;P = 0.028)的患者相比,接受静脉注射Bu的患者复发频率较低,但非复发死亡率和生存率相似。在无白血病生存(LFS)方面,检测到供体关系与主要效应之间存在显著交互作用。在接受HLA相同的同胞供体移植的患者中,而非接受URD移植的患者中,与接受TBI相比,接受静脉注射Bu(RR,0.53;P = 0.025)或口服Bu(RR,0.64;P = 0.017)的患者LFS更好。在慢性期的CML中,Cy联合静脉注射Bu比TBI或口服Bu的复发率更低。与TBI相比,静脉注射或口服Bu后的LFS更好。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Busulfan or TBI: answer to an age-old question.白消安或 TBI:一个古老问题的答案。
Blood. 2013 Dec 5;122(24):3856-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-10-530006.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验