• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区联盟的案例研究:在有先见之明的州推进地方烟草控制政策。

Case studies from community coalitions: advancing local tobacco control policy in a preemptive state.

机构信息

Oklahoma State Department of Health.

Cleveland County Turning Point-Tobacco Free Cleveland County, Norman.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1 Suppl 1):S29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.020.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.020
PMID:25528703
Abstract

Policies that shield people from the harm of tobacco exposure are essential to protect the health of the population. Coalitions have often led the way in safeguarding community health by promoting social norm change though policy adoption. In some states, tobacco control laws are weak, in part because of a tobacco industry tactic of prohibiting or pre-empting communities from enacting ordinances that are more protective. In spite of strong state-level preemptions, local coalitions in Oklahoma have implemented hundreds of voluntary policies in tobacco control that have improved the protection and health of their communities while not violating preemption. Three case studies of policy change are presented that exemplify the key approach of local coalitions working with strong allies and informed decision makers to establish tobacco-free businesses, schools, and outdoor recreational areas. In each of the cases, the policy changes surpassed the protection provided by the state laws and inspired additional policy changes. The key strategies and lessons learned may help tobacco control coalitions in other states limited by preemption to garner more support and momentum for important policy changes within their communities and states.

摘要

保护人们免受烟草暴露危害的政策对于保护人口健康至关重要。联盟经常通过通过政策采用来促进社会规范的改变,从而在保障社区健康方面走在前列。在一些州,由于烟草业禁止或先发制人地阻止社区制定更具保护性的条例,烟草控制法较为薄弱。尽管有强烈的州级预先禁令,但俄克拉荷马州的地方联盟仍在烟草控制方面实施了数百项自愿政策,这些政策改善了社区的保护和健康状况,同时并未违反预先禁令。本文提出了三个政策变化的案例研究,这些案例说明了地方联盟与强大的盟友和知情决策者合作,建立无烟企业、学校和户外娱乐区的主要方法。在每个案例中,政策变化都超过了州法律所提供的保护,并激发了更多的政策变化。这些关键策略和经验教训可能有助于受到预先禁令限制的其他州的烟草控制联盟在其社区和州内争取更多支持和动力,以实现重要政策的改变。

相似文献

1
Case studies from community coalitions: advancing local tobacco control policy in a preemptive state.社区联盟的案例研究:在有先见之明的州推进地方烟草控制政策。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1 Suppl 1):S29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.020.
2
Tobacco control and prevention in Oklahoma: best practices in a preemptive state.俄克拉荷马州的烟草控制与预防:先发制人的州的最佳实践。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1 Suppl 1):S6-S12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.001.
3
Tobacco Control and Prevention in Oklahoma: Best Practices in a Preemptive State.俄克拉荷马州的烟草控制与预防:先发制人州的最佳实践
J Okla State Med Assoc. 2015 Nov;108(11):434-40.
4
Communities of excellence in tobacco control: changes in local policy and key outcomes.烟草控制卓越社区:地方政策变化和主要成果。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1 Suppl 1):S21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.002.
5
Sustaining tobacco control coalitions amid declining resources.在资源不断减少的情况下维持烟草控制联盟。
Health Promot Pract. 2007 Jul;8(3):292-8. doi: 10.1177/1524839906289820. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
6
State preemption of local tobacco control policies restricting smoking, advertising, and youth access--United States, 2000-2010.州政府对限制吸烟、广告和青少年吸烟的地方烟草控制政策的优先干预——美国,2000-2010 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Aug 26;60(33):1124-7.
7
Oklahoma tobacco policy-making.俄克拉何马州的烟草政策制定。
J Okla State Med Assoc. 2005 Mar;98(3):89-94.
8
Overcoming a powerful tobacco lobby in enacting local smoking ordinances: the Contra Costa County experience.在制定地方禁烟条例时战胜强大的烟草游说团体:康特拉科斯塔县的经验。
J Public Health Policy. 1996;17(1):28-46.
9
The long-term effect of local policies to restrict retail sale of tobacco to youth.限制向青少年零售烟草的地方政策的长期影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Jun;8(3):371-7. doi: 10.1080/14622200600670249.
10
A neo-strategic planning approach to enhance local tobacco control programs.一种增强地方烟草控制项目的新战略规划方法。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1 Suppl 1):S13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.027.

引用本文的文献

1
Building healthcare-community partnerships: process evaluation of a coalition approach to addressing cancer survivors' health-related social needs.建立医疗保健与社区的伙伴关系:对一种联合方法进行过程评估,以满足癌症幸存者与健康相关的社会需求。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 28;25(1):763. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12883-7.
2
Local Public Health Policymakers' Views on State Preemption: Results of a National Survey, 2018.地方公共卫生政策制定者对州级先行的看法:2018 年全国调查结果。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Aug;109(8):1107-1110. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305140. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
3
Voluntary Smoke-Free Measures Among Oklahoma Nightlife Owners: Barriers and Facilitators.
俄克拉荷马州夜生活场所经营者采取的自愿无烟措施:障碍与促进因素
Health Promot Pract. 2019 Mar;20(2):196-205. doi: 10.1177/1524839918764897. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
4
Youth Advocates' Perceptions of Tobacco Industry Marketing Influences on Adolescent Smoking: Can They See the Signs?青少年倡导者对烟草行业营销对青少年吸烟的影响的认知:他们能察觉到这些迹象吗?
AIMS Public Health. 2016 Mar 4;3(1):83-93. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.83. eCollection 2016.