• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俄克拉荷马州夜生活场所经营者采取的自愿无烟措施:障碍与促进因素

Voluntary Smoke-Free Measures Among Oklahoma Nightlife Owners: Barriers and Facilitators.

作者信息

Benowitz-Fredericks Carson, McQuoid Julia, Sheon Nicolas, Olson Sarah, Ling Pamela M

机构信息

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2019 Mar;20(2):196-205. doi: 10.1177/1524839918764897. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1177/1524839918764897
PMID:29606038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6119530/
Abstract

Smoke-free policies prevent exposure to secondhand smoke and encourage tobacco cessation. Local smoke-free policies that are more comprehensive than statewide policies are not allowed in states with preemption, including Oklahoma, which has the sixth highest smoking prevalence in the United States. In states with preemption, voluntary smoke-free measures are encouraged, but little research exists on venue owners' and managers' views of such measures, particularly in nightlife businesses such as bars and nightclubs. This article draws from semistructured interviews with 23 Oklahoma bar owners and managers, examining perceived risks and benefits of adopting voluntary smoke-free measures in their venues. No respondents expressed awareness of preemption. Many reported that smoke-free bars and nightclubs were an inevitable societal trend, particularly as younger customers increasingly expected smoke-free venues. Business benefits such as decreased operating and cleaning costs, improved atmosphere, and employee efficiency were more convincing than improved employee health. Concerns that voluntary measures created an uneven playing field among venues competing for customers formed a substantial barrier to voluntary measures. Other barriers included concerns about lost revenue and fear of disloyalty to customers, particularly older smokers. Addressing business benefits and a level playing field may increase support for voluntary smoke-free nightlife measures.

摘要

无烟政策可防止接触二手烟并鼓励戒烟。在实行先发制的州,包括美国吸烟率排名第六的俄克拉荷马州,不允许实施比全州范围政策更全面的地方无烟政策。在实行先发制的州,鼓励采取自愿性无烟措施,但对于场所所有者和管理者对这些措施的看法,尤其是在酒吧和夜总会等夜生活场所,相关研究较少。本文基于对23位俄克拉荷马州酒吧所有者和管理者的半结构化访谈,探讨在其场所采取自愿性无烟措施的感知风险和益处。没有受访者表示了解先发制规定。许多人报告称,无烟酒吧和夜总会是一种不可避免的社会趋势,尤其是随着年轻顾客越来越期望有无烟场所。诸如降低运营和清洁成本、改善氛围以及提高员工效率等商业利益,比改善员工健康更具说服力。对于自愿性措施会在争夺顾客的场所之间造成不公平竞争环境的担忧,构成了自愿性措施的一大障碍。其他障碍包括对收入损失的担忧以及对顾客忠诚度的担忧,尤其是对老年吸烟者的忠诚度。解决商业利益和平等竞争环境问题可能会增加对自愿性无烟夜生活措施的支持。

相似文献

1
Voluntary Smoke-Free Measures Among Oklahoma Nightlife Owners: Barriers and Facilitators.俄克拉荷马州夜生活场所经营者采取的自愿无烟措施:障碍与促进因素
Health Promot Pract. 2019 Mar;20(2):196-205. doi: 10.1177/1524839918764897. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
2
Business policies affecting secondhand smoke exposure.影响二手烟暴露的商业政策。
N C Med J. 2008 Sep-Oct;69(5):355-61.
3
Impacting Multiunit Housing Managers' Beliefs About the Benefits of Adopting Smoke-Free Policies: A Pilot Investigation.影响多单元住房管理者对采用无烟政策益处的看法:一项试点调查。
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Feb;32(2):271-273. doi: 10.1177/0890117116670291. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
4
Understanding the dynamics of compliance to smoke-free policy regulations: Exploring the perspectives of venue owners and staff in Türkiye.了解无烟政策法规的遵守动态:探索土耳其场所业主和工作人员的观点。
Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Jan 17;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/176226. eCollection 2024.
5
How restaurant and bar owners view clean indoor air legislation five years after implementation in North Carolina, 2015.2015年北卡罗来纳州实施室内空气清洁立法五年后,餐厅和酒吧老板对此的看法。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2017 Aug 1;3:122. doi: 10.18332/tpc/75914. eCollection 2017.
6
"You Want Your Guests to Be Happy in This Business": Hoteliers' Decisions to Adopt Voluntary Smoke-Free Guest-Room Policies.“在这个行业,你希望你的客人感到满意”:酒店经营者采用自愿无烟客房政策的决定。
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Nov;32(8):1740-1746. doi: 10.1177/0890117118763742. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
7
Tobacco control and prevention in Oklahoma: best practices in a preemptive state.俄克拉荷马州的烟草控制与预防:先发制人的州的最佳实践。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1 Suppl 1):S6-S12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.001.
8
Socially cued smoking in bars, nightclubs, and gaming venues: a case for introducing smoke-free policies.酒吧、夜总会和游戏场所中的社交性诱导吸烟:推行无烟政策的理由。
Tob Control. 2002 Dec;11(4):300-4. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.4.300.
9
The effect of smoke-free policies on hospitality industry revenues in Cyprus: an econometric approach.无烟政策对塞浦路斯酒店业收入的影响:一种计量经济学方法。
Tob Control. 2015 Oct;24(e3):e199-204. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051477. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
10
A statewide assessment of smoke-free policy in multiunit housing settings.对多单元住房环境中无烟政策的全州范围评估。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Dec;16(12):1593-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu114. Epub 2014 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the dynamics of compliance to smoke-free policy regulations: Exploring the perspectives of venue owners and staff in Türkiye.了解无烟政策法规的遵守动态:探索土耳其场所业主和工作人员的观点。
Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Jan 17;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/176226. eCollection 2024.
2
Measuring public opinion and acceptability of prevention policies: an integrative review and narrative synthesis of methods.测量公众意见和预防政策的可接受性:方法的综合评价和叙述性综合。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 4;20(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00829-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Legislative smoking bans for reducing harms from secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption.立法禁烟以减少二手烟暴露、吸烟流行率和烟草消费带来的危害。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 4;2(2):CD005992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005992.pub3.
2
"Tired of watching customers walk out the door because of the smoke": a content analysis of media coverage of voluntarily smokefree restaurants and bars.“厌倦了看着顾客因烟雾而离开”:对无烟餐厅和酒吧媒体报道的内容分析
BMC Public Health. 2015 Aug 8;15:761. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2094-6.
3
Oklahoma Retailers' Perspectives on Mutual Benefit Exchange to Limit Point-of-Sale Tobacco Advertisements.俄克拉荷马州零售商对互利交换以限制销售点烟草广告的看法。
Health Promot Pract. 2015 Sep;16(5):699-706. doi: 10.1177/1524839915577082. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
4
Tobacco control and prevention in Oklahoma: best practices in a preemptive state.俄克拉荷马州的烟草控制与预防:先发制人的州的最佳实践。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1 Suppl 1):S6-S12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.001.
5
Case studies from community coalitions: advancing local tobacco control policy in a preemptive state.社区联盟的案例研究:在有先见之明的州推进地方烟草控制政策。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1 Suppl 1):S29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.020.
6
Changes in smoking-related norms in bars resulting from California's Smoke-Free Workplace Act.加利福尼亚州《无烟工作场所法案》导致酒吧内与吸烟相关规范的变化。
J Drug Educ. 2012;42(3):315-26. doi: 10.2190/DE.42.3.d.
7
The impact of state preemption of local smoking restrictions on public health protections and changes in social norms.州政府对地方禁烟令的干预对公共卫生保护和社会规范变化的影响。
J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:632629. doi: 10.1155/2012/632629. Epub 2012 May 10.
8
State preemption of local tobacco control policies restricting smoking, advertising, and youth access--United States, 2000-2010.州政府对限制吸烟、广告和青少年吸烟的地方烟草控制政策的优先干预——美国,2000-2010 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Aug 26;60(33):1124-7.
9
Reinforcement of smoking and drinking: tobacco marketing strategies linked with alcohol in the United States.强化吸烟和饮酒行为:美国的烟草营销策略与酒精相关联。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Oct;101(10):1942-54. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300157. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
10
Post-ban self-reports on economic impact of smoke-free bars and restaurants are biased by pre-ban attitudes. A longitudinal study among employees.禁烟酒吧和餐馆对经济影响的禁令后自我报告存在偏见,由禁令前的态度造成。一项针对员工的纵向研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Nov;39(7):776-9. doi: 10.1177/1403494811414245. Epub 2011 Jul 4.