• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在制定地方禁烟条例时战胜强大的烟草游说团体:康特拉科斯塔县的经验。

Overcoming a powerful tobacco lobby in enacting local smoking ordinances: the Contra Costa County experience.

作者信息

Ellis G A, Hobart R L, Reed D F

机构信息

Tobacco Prevention Project, Contra Costa County Health Services Department, Martinez, CA 94553, USA.

出版信息

J Public Health Policy. 1996;17(1):28-46.

PMID:8919958
Abstract

As part of a comprehensive tobacco education campaign, local health departments throughout California have been engaged in the process of enacting local clean indoor air ordinances to protect the public from the effects of secondhand smoke. This paper describes how a Northern California Bay Area health department worked with city and county governments to pass ordinances in the face of persistent tobacco industry opposition. The key strategies used by the health department included organizing broad-based coalitions, achieving effective use of the media, and educating the business community. Tobacco industry tactics included establishing local front groups that launched a massive misinformation campaign to frighten local businesses into believing that passage of an ordinance would adversely affect their business. Finally, the authors discuss how the tobacco industry has created a climate through state and national legislative activity to undermine the ability of local health departments to pursue effective tobacco control policies, most notably through preemptive legislation.

摘要

作为全面烟草教育运动的一部分,加利福尼亚州各地的地方卫生部门一直在参与制定地方室内清洁空气条例的过程,以保护公众免受二手烟的影响。本文描述了北加利福尼亚湾区的一个卫生部门如何在烟草行业持续反对的情况下,与市县政府合作通过条例。卫生部门使用的关键策略包括组建基础广泛的联盟、有效利用媒体以及对商业团体进行教育。烟草行业的策略包括成立地方前沿组织,发起大规模错误信息宣传活动,吓唬当地企业,使其相信条例的通过会对其业务产生不利影响。最后,作者讨论了烟草行业如何通过州和国家层面的立法活动营造了一种氛围,以破坏地方卫生部门推行有效烟草控制政策的能力,最显著的方式是通过先发制人的立法。

相似文献

1
Overcoming a powerful tobacco lobby in enacting local smoking ordinances: the Contra Costa County experience.在制定地方禁烟条例时战胜强大的烟草游说团体:康特拉科斯塔县的经验。
J Public Health Policy. 1996;17(1):28-46.
2
New tobacco industry strategy to prevent local tobacco control.烟草行业阻止地方烟草控制的新战略。
JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):479-86.
3
Double-barreled assault.双管齐下的攻击。
Tex Med. 1995 Sep;91(9):12-5.
4
Preemptive state tobacco-control laws--United States, 1982-1998.先发制人的州烟草控制法——美国,1982 - 1998年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999 Jan 8;47(51-52):1112-4.
5
Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.在一项由烟草行业资助的婴儿猝死综合征评估中,关于二手烟的结论突然改变。
Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e356-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1922.
6
Science, advocacy and health policy: lessons from the New Zealand tobacco wars.科学、宣传与健康政策:新西兰烟草之战的教训
J Public Health Policy. 1991 Summer;12(2):175-83.
7
Independent evaluation of the California Tobacco Education Program.加利福尼亚烟草教育项目的独立评估。
Public Health Rep. 1996 Jul-Aug;111(4):353-8.
8
Tobacco control and direct democracy in Dade County, Florida: future implications for health advocates.佛罗里达州戴德县的烟草控制与直接民主:对健康倡导者的未来影响
J Public Health Policy. 2000;21(3):268-95.
9
Oklahoma tobacco policy-making.俄克拉何马州的烟草政策制定。
J Okla State Med Assoc. 2005 Mar;98(3):89-94.
10
Development of a social will for tobacco control index.制定烟草控制指数的社会意愿
Am J Health Behav. 2006 Jan-Feb;30(1):15-26. doi: 10.5555/ajhb.2006.30.1.15.

引用本文的文献

1
The association of county-level socioeconomic factors with individual tobacco and alcohol use: a longitudinal study of U.S. adults.县级社会经济因素与个体烟酒使用的关联:对美国成年人的纵向研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 11;19(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6700-x.
2
Youth-led tobacco prevention: lessons learned for engaging Southeast Asian American youth.青年主导的烟草预防:吸引美籍东南亚青年的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Summer;6(2):187-94. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0022.
3
Local enactment of tobacco control policies in Massachusetts.
马萨诸塞州烟草控制政策的地方立法。
Am J Public Health. 2002 Jun;92(6):941-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.6.941.
4
Economic effect of restaurant smoking restrictions on restaurant business in Massachusetts, 1992 to 1998.1992年至1998年马萨诸塞州餐厅吸烟限制对餐厅生意的经济影响。
Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii38-42. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_2.ii38.
5
Tobacco Institute lobbying at the state and local levels of government in the 1990s.20世纪90年代,烟草协会在州和地方政府层面进行游说活动。
Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):I102-9. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i102.
6
Boards of Health as venues for clean indoor air policy making.作为制定室内空气清洁政策场所的卫生局。
Am J Public Health. 2002 Feb;92(2):257-65. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.2.257.