Smith Amanda L, Benazzi Stefano, Ledogar Justin A, Tamvada Kelli, Pryor Smith Leslie C, Weber Gerhard W, Spencer Mark A, Dechow Paul C, Grosse Ian R, Ross Callum F, Richmond Brian G, Wright Barth W, Wang Qian, Byron Craig, Slice Dennis E, Strait David S
Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, Albany, New York.
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2015 Jan;298(1):122-44. doi: 10.1002/ar.23074.
In a broad range of evolutionary studies, an understanding of intraspecific variation is needed in order to contextualize and interpret the meaning of variation between species. However, mechanical analyses of primate crania using experimental or modeling methods typically encounter logistical constraints that force them to rely on data gathered from only one or a few individuals. This results in a lack of knowledge concerning the mechanical significance of intraspecific shape variation that limits our ability to infer the significance of interspecific differences. This study uses geometric morphometric methods (GM) and finite element analysis (FEA) to examine the biomechanical implications of shape variation in chimpanzee crania, thereby providing a comparative context in which to interpret shape-related mechanical variation between hominin species. Six finite element models (FEMs) of chimpanzee crania were constructed from CT scans following shape-space Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of a matrix of 709 Procrustes coordinates (digitized onto 21 specimens) to identify the individuals at the extremes of the first three principal components. The FEMs were assigned the material properties of bone and were loaded and constrained to simulate maximal bites on the P(3) and M(2) . Resulting strains indicate that intraspecific cranial variation in morphology is associated with quantitatively high levels of variation in strain magnitudes, but qualitatively little variation in the distribution of strain concentrations. Thus, interspecific comparisons should include considerations of the spatial patterning of strains rather than focus only on their magnitudes.
在广泛的进化研究中,为了将物种间变异的意义置于具体情境并进行解释,需要了解种内变异。然而,使用实验或建模方法对灵长类颅骨进行力学分析时,通常会遇到后勤方面的限制,这迫使他们只能依赖从一个或少数个体收集的数据。这导致我们对种内形状变异的力学意义缺乏了解,从而限制了我们推断种间差异意义的能力。本研究使用几何形态测量方法(GM)和有限元分析(FEA)来研究黑猩猩颅骨形状变异的生物力学影响,从而提供一个比较背景,以便解释人类物种之间与形状相关的力学变异。在对709个普氏坐标矩阵(数字化到21个标本上)进行形状空间主成分分析(PCA)后,根据CT扫描构建了六个黑猩猩颅骨的有限元模型(FEM),以识别前三个主成分极值处的个体。有限元模型被赋予骨骼的材料属性,并进行加载和约束,以模拟对P(3)和M(2)的最大咬合力。结果应变表明,种内颅骨形态变异与应变大小的高水平定量变异相关,但应变集中分布的定性变异很小。因此,种间比较应包括对应变空间模式的考虑,而不是只关注其大小。