• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Longitudinal Patterns of Women's Marital Quality: The Case of Divorce, Cohabitation, and Race-Ethnicity.女性婚姻质量的纵向模式:以离婚、同居和种族为例。
Marriage Fam Rev. 2014 Jan 1;50(8):738-763. doi: 10.1080/01494929.2014.938797.
2
Variation in trajectories of women's marital quality.女性婚姻质量轨迹的变化。
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Jan;49:16-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
3
Stability of marital unions and fertility in Nigeria.尼日利亚婚姻关系的稳定性与生育率
J Biosoc Sci. 1998 Jan;30(1):33-41. doi: 10.1017/s0021932098000339.
4
The duration of lone parenthood in Great Britain.英国单亲家庭的持续时间。
Eur J Popul. 1991 Jun;7(2):129-58. doi: 10.1007/BF01797100.
5
Pathways to educational homogamy in marital and cohabiting unions.婚姻和同居伴侣中教育同型婚配的途径。
Demography. 2010 Aug;47(3):735-53. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0124.
6
Age difference asymmetry and a two-sex perspective.年龄差异不对称与双性视角。
Eur J Popul. 1992;8(1):23-45. doi: 10.1007/BF01797120.
7
Assessment of personality and demographic aspects of cohabitation and marital success.同居与婚姻成功的个性及人口统计学因素评估。
J Pers Assess. 1980 Feb;44(1):11-24. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4401_2.
8
Variation in marital quality in a national sample of divorced women.全国离婚女性样本中的婚姻质量差异。
J Fam Psychol. 2015 Jun;29(3):479-89. doi: 10.1037/fam0000082. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
9
Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States.美国的同居、结婚、离婚和再婚情况。
Vital Health Stat 23. 2002 Jul(22):1-93.
10
Starting over. Why remarriages are more unstable.重新开始。为何再婚关系更不稳定。
J Fam Issues. 1992 Jun;13(2):179-94. doi: 10.1177/019251392013002004.

引用本文的文献

1
Marital loss and risk of dementia: Do race and gender matter?婚姻丧失与痴呆风险:种族和性别重要吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Apr;275:113808. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113808. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
2
Social Determinants of Racial Disparities in CKD.慢性肾脏病种族差异的社会决定因素
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Sep;27(9):2576-95. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016010027. Epub 2016 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in cohabitation and implications for children s family contexts in the United States.美国同居趋势及其对儿童家庭环境的影响。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2000 Jan;54(1):29-41. doi: 10.1080/713779060.
2
Reassessing the Link between Women's Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Quality.重新评估女性婚前同居与婚姻质量之间的联系。
Soc Forces. 2012 Dec;91(2):435-662. doi: 10.1093/sf/sos126.
3
Later first marriage and marital success.再婚与婚姻成功。
Soc Sci Res. 2010 Sep;39(5):787-800. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
4
Demographic Trends in the United States: A Review of Research in the 2000s.美国的人口趋势:21世纪研究综述
J Marriage Fam. 2010 Jun;72(3):403-419. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00710.x.
5
Trajectories of Marital Conflict Across the Life Course: Predictors and Interactions With Marital Happiness Trajectories.人生历程中婚姻冲突的轨迹:预测因素及其与婚姻幸福轨迹的相互作用。
J Fam Issues. 2012 Mar 1;33(3):341-368. doi: 10.1177/0192513X11409684.
6
Why do even satisfied newlyweds eventually go on to divorce?为什么即使是满意的新婚夫妇最终也会离婚?
J Fam Psychol. 2012 Feb;26(1):1-10. doi: 10.1037/a0025966. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
7
As Good as it Gets? A Life Course Perspective on Marital Quality.《臻于至善?婚姻质量的生命历程视角》
Soc Forces. 2005 Sep;84(1):493-511. doi: 10.1353/sof.2005.0131.
8
Patterns of Change in Marital Satisfaction Over the Newlywed Years.新婚岁月中婚姻满意度的变化模式。
J Marriage Fam. 2010 Oct 1;72(5):1171-1187. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00757.x.
9
Developmental trajectories of marital happiness in continuously married individuals: a group-based modeling approach.连续婚姻个体婚姻幸福感的发展轨迹:基于群组的建模方法。
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Oct;24(5):587-96. doi: 10.1037/a0020928.
10
Marital quality, health, and aging: gender equity?婚姻质量、健康与衰老:性别平等?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005 Oct;60 Spec No 2(SPEC):109-13. doi: 10.1093/geronb/60.special_issue_2.s109.

女性婚姻质量的纵向模式:以离婚、同居和种族为例。

Longitudinal Patterns of Women's Marital Quality: The Case of Divorce, Cohabitation, and Race-Ethnicity.

作者信息

James Spencer

机构信息

School of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Marriage Fam Rev. 2014 Jan 1;50(8):738-763. doi: 10.1080/01494929.2014.938797.

DOI:10.1080/01494929.2014.938797
PMID:25530643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4267323/
Abstract

Previous work on marital quality has compared average levels of marital quality by demographic characteristics, such as cohabitation, divorce, or race-ethnicity. Less work has examined whether such differences persist over time. To begin to answer this question, this paper uses multigroup latent growth curves to examine changes in marital quality over time in addition to measuring differences in levels of reported marital quality among cohabitors vs. non-cohabitors, divorced vs. stably married women, and members of different racial-ethnic groups. Although many of the differences are small and statistically insignificant, the results show that non-normative and traditionally disadvantaged groups experience not only lower levels of marital quality but that these differences also persist throughout the life course. I also show that using marital instead of relationship duration for cohabitors has substantive implications when interpreting the results.

摘要

先前关于婚姻质量的研究通过人口统计学特征(如同居、离婚或种族)比较了婚姻质量的平均水平。较少有研究考察这些差异是否会随时间持续存在。为了开始回答这个问题,本文使用多组潜在增长曲线来考察婚姻质量随时间的变化,此外还测量了同居者与非同居者、离婚女性与婚姻稳定女性以及不同种族群体成员在报告的婚姻质量水平上的差异。尽管许多差异较小且在统计学上不显著,但结果表明,非规范性和传统上处于劣势的群体不仅婚姻质量水平较低,而且这些差异在整个生命历程中也持续存在。我还表明,在解释结果时,对于同居者使用婚姻持续时间而非关系持续时间具有实质性影响。