• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reducing Alcohol Risk in Adjudicated Male College Students: Further Validation of a Group Motivational Enhancement Intervention.降低被裁定违规的男大学生的酒精风险:团体动机增强干预的进一步验证
J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2010 Dec;20(1):82-98. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2011.534369.
2
A group Motivational Interviewing intervention reduces drinking and alcohol-related negative consequences in adjudicated college women.一项团体动机性访谈干预措施可减少被裁决的大学女生的饮酒行为及与酒精相关的负面后果。
Addict Behav. 2007 Nov;32(11):2549-62. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.014. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
3
Brief Motivational Interventions Are Associated with Reductions in Alcohol-Induced Blackouts Among Heavy Drinking College Students.简短的动机性访谈干预与减少重度饮酒大学生的酒精性断片有关。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 May;43(5):988-996. doi: 10.1111/acer.14019. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
4
Descriptive norms and expectancies as mediators of a brief motivational intervention for mandated college students receiving stepped care for alcohol use.描述性规范和期望作为对接受酒精使用逐步护理的强制大学生进行简短动机干预的中介因素。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Dec;29(4):1003-11. doi: 10.1037/adb0000092. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
5
Reducing alcohol use in mandated college students: A comparison of a Brief Motivational Intervention (BMI) and the Expectancy Challenge Alcohol Literacy Curriculum (ECALC).减少强制大学生饮酒:简短动机干预(BMI)与期望挑战酒精素养课程(ECALC)的比较。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Feb;28(1):87-98. doi: 10.1037/pha0000290.
6
A Novel Approach for Streamlining Delivery of Brief Motivational Interventions to Mandated College Students: Using Group and Individual Sessions Matched to Level of Risk.一种简化向受强制要求的大学生提供简短动机干预措施的新方法:采用与风险水平相匹配的小组和个别辅导课程。
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Dec 6;52(14):1883-1891. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1318148. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
7
Social norms information for alcohol misuse in university and college students.针对大学生酒精滥用问题的社会规范信息。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 26;1:CD006748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006748.pub3.
8
Single-Session Alcohol Interventions for Heavy Drinking College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.针对重度饮酒大学生的单次酒精干预:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015 Jul;76(4):530-43. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2015.76.530.
9
Brief motivational interviewing for DWI recidivists who abuse alcohol and are not participating in DWI intervention: a randomized controlled trial.对既酗酒又不参与酒驾干预的酒驾累犯进行简短动机性访谈:一项随机对照试验。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010 Feb;34(2):292-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01092.x. Epub 2009 Nov 20.
10
Randomized controlled trial of computerized alcohol intervention for college students: role of class level.大学生计算机化酒精干预的随机对照试验:年级水平的作用
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2016;42(1):15-24. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2015.1105241. Epub 2015 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender Informed or Gender Ignored? Opportunities for Gender Transformative Approaches in Brief Alcohol Interventions on College Campuses.性别视角化还是性别忽视?校园简短酒精干预中性别转化方法的机会。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 7;17(2):396. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020396.
2
Emotion Regulation Enhancement of Cognitive Behavior Therapy for College Student Problem Drinkers: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.针对大学生问题饮酒者的认知行为疗法的情绪调节增强:一项试点随机对照试验。
J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2018;27(1):47-58. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2017.1400484. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
3
Motivational interviewing for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young adults.动机性访谈预防青年成人酒精滥用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 18;7(7):CD007025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007025.pub4.
4
Social norms information for alcohol misuse in university and college students.针对大学生酒精滥用问题的社会规范信息。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 29;2015(12):CD006748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006748.pub4.
5
Decisional Balance: Alcohol Decisional Balance Intervention for Heavy Drinking Undergraduates.决策平衡:针对重度饮酒大学生的酒精决策平衡干预
Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(13):1717-27. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2015.1036883. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
6
Reducing the Harms of College Student Drinking: How Alan Marlatt Changed Approaches, Outcomes, and the Field.减少大学生饮酒危害:艾伦·马尔拉特如何改变方法、成果及该领域。
Addict Res Theory. 2012;20(3):227-235. doi: 10.3109/16066359.2011.651517.
7
A review of decisional balance research and directions for brief alcohol intervention among college students.大学生饮酒决策平衡研究综述及简短酒精干预方向
OA Alcohol. 2013 May 1;1(1):7. doi: 10.13172/2053-0285-1-1-575.
8
The development of the Lifestyle and Habits Questionnaire-brief version: relationship to quality of life and stress in college students.生活方式和习惯问卷简明版的发展:与大学生生活质量和压力的关系。
Prev Sci. 2014 Feb;15(1):103-14. doi: 10.1007/s11121-013-0370-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Brief intervention in college settings.大学环境中的简短干预。
Alcohol Res Health. 2004;28(2):94-104.
2
Profiles of college students mandated to alcohol intervention.被要求接受酒精干预的大学生概况。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008 Sep;69(5):684-94. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2008.69.684.
3
Changes in drinking before a mandated brief intervention with college students.对大学生进行强制简短干预前饮酒情况的变化。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008 Mar;69(2):286-90. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2008.69.286.
4
A group Motivational Interviewing intervention reduces drinking and alcohol-related negative consequences in adjudicated college women.一项团体动机性访谈干预措施可减少被裁决的大学女生的饮酒行为及与酒精相关的负面后果。
Addict Behav. 2007 Nov;32(11):2549-62. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.014. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
5
Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006.再谈识别、预防与治疗:1999 - 2006年以个体为中心的大学生饮酒预防策略
Addict Behav. 2007 Nov;32(11):2439-68. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 May 17.
6
Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analytic review.减少大学生饮酒的个体层面干预措施:一项元分析综述。
Addict Behav. 2007 Nov;32(11):2469-94. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 May 17.
7
Predictors of alcohol use during the first year of college: implications for prevention.大学一年级饮酒行为的预测因素:对预防工作的启示
Addict Behav. 2007 Oct;32(10):2062-86. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.01.017. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
8
Two-year outcome of alcohol interventions in Swedish university halls of residence: a cluster randomized trial of a brief skills training program, twelve-step-influenced intervention, and controls.瑞典大学宿舍酒精干预措施的两年成效:一项关于简短技能培训计划、受十二步疗法影响的干预措施及对照的整群随机试验
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Mar;31(3):458-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00327.x.
9
Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: A randomized controlled trial.针对重度饮酒大学生的简短动机干预:一项随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Oct;74(5):943-54. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.943.
10
A within-subjects validation of a group-administered timeline followback for alcohol use.团体施测的酒精使用时间线追溯法的被试内效度验证
J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Mar;67(2):332-5. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.332.

降低被裁定违规的男大学生的酒精风险:团体动机增强干预的进一步验证

Reducing Alcohol Risk in Adjudicated Male College Students: Further Validation of a Group Motivational Enhancement Intervention.

作者信息

LaBRIE Joseph W, Cail Jessica, Pedersen Eric R, Migliuri Savannah

机构信息

Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2010 Dec;20(1):82-98. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2011.534369.

DOI:10.1080/1067828X.2011.534369
PMID:25525319
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4267112/
Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of a single-session group motivational enhancement alcohol intervention on adjudicated male college students. Over two sequential academic years, 230 students sanctioned by the university for alcohol-related infractions attended a 60- to 75-minute group intervention. The intervention consisted of a timeline followback, social norms education, decisional balance for behavioral change, blood alcohol content (BAC) information, expectancy challenge, and generation of behavioral goals. Participants were followed weekly for three months and showed reductions in drinking (29%) and alcohol-related consequences (32%) at three-month follow-up. The intervention was successful in reducing drinking for both first-year students and upperclassmen, with reductions appearing to be a function of the intervention and not the citation itself. Furthermore, a post hoc control condition revealed that those participants randomly assigned to the intervention group condition reduced drinking (19%) and alcohol-related consequences (44%) more than participants in the control condition over one month. These results provide continued evidence of the effectiveness of group motivational enhancement interventions with adjudicated male college students.

摘要

本研究考察了单次团体动机增强酒精干预对被裁定违规的男大学生的有效性。在连续两个学年中,230名因与酒精相关的违规行为而受到学校处分的学生参加了一次60至75分钟的团体干预。该干预包括时间线回溯、社会规范教育、行为改变的决策平衡、血液酒精含量(BAC)信息、预期挑战以及行为目标的设定。参与者在三个月内每周接受随访,在三个月的随访中,饮酒量减少了29%,与酒精相关的后果减少了32%。该干预对一年级学生和高年级学生的饮酒量减少均有成效,减少似乎是干预的作用而非传票本身的作用。此外,事后对照条件显示,在一个月的时间里,随机分配到干预组的参与者饮酒量减少了19%,与酒精相关的后果减少了44%,比对照组的参与者减少得更多。这些结果为团体动机增强干预对被裁定违规的男大学生的有效性提供了持续的证据。