Montoye Alexander H, Dong Bo, Biswas Subir, Pfeiffer Karin A
Department of Kinesiology, 308 W. Circle Dr., Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 428 S. Shaw Ln., Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Electronics (Basel). 2014;3(2):205-220. doi: 10.3390/electronics3020205.
Single, hip-mounted accelerometers can provide accurate measurements of energy expenditure (EE) in some settings, but are unable to accurately estimate the energy cost of many non-ambulatory activities. A multi-sensor network may be able to overcome the limitations of a single accelerometer. Thus, the purpose of our study was to compare the abilities of a wireless network of accelerometers and a hip-mounted accelerometer for the prediction of EE. Thirty adult participants engaged in 14 different sedentary, ambulatory, lifestyle and exercise activities for five minutes each while wearing a portable metabolic analyzer, a hip-mounted accelerometer (AG) and a wireless network of three accelerometers (WN) worn on the right wrist, thigh and ankle. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) were created separately for the AG and WN for the EE prediction. Pearson correlations () and the root mean square error (RMSE) were calculated to compare criterion-measured EE to predicted EE from the ANNs. Overall, correlations were higher ( = 0.95 = 0.88, < 0.0001) and RMSE was lower (1.34 1.97 metabolic equivalents (METs), < 0.0001) for the WN than the AG. In conclusion, the WN outperformed the AG for measuring EE, providing evidence that the WN can provide highly accurate estimates of EE in adults participating in a wide range of activities.
单个体位固定在髋部的加速度计在某些情况下能够提供准确的能量消耗(EE)测量值,但无法准确估计许多非步行活动的能量消耗成本。多传感器网络或许能够克服单个加速度计的局限性。因此,我们研究的目的是比较加速度计无线网络和髋部佩戴的加速度计在预测能量消耗方面的能力。30名成年参与者在分别进行14种不同的久坐、步行、生活方式和运动活动时,每次持续5分钟,同时佩戴便携式代谢分析仪、一个佩戴在髋部的加速度计(AG)以及一个由三个加速度计组成的无线网络(WN),分别佩戴在右手腕、大腿和脚踝上。针对AG和WN分别创建人工神经网络(ANNs)用于预测能量消耗。计算皮尔逊相关系数()和均方根误差(RMSE),以比较标准测量的能量消耗与ANNs预测的能量消耗。总体而言,与AG相比,WN的相关性更高( = 0.95 = 0.88, < 0.0001),RMSE更低(1.34 1.97代谢当量(METs), < 0.0001)。总之,在测量能量消耗方面,WN优于AG,这表明WN能够为参与广泛活动的成年人提供高度准确的能量消耗估计值。