Donovan Dennis M, Hatch-Maillette Mary A, Phares Melissa M, McGarry Ernest, Peavy K Michelle, Taborsky Julie
Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Mar;50:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
Post-visit "booster" sessions have been recommended to augment the impact of brief interventions delivered in the emergency department (ED). This paper, which focuses on implementation issues, presents descriptive information and interventionists' qualitative perspectives on providing brief interventions over the phone, challenges, "lessons learned", and recommendations for others attempting to implement adjunctive booster calls.
Attempts were made to complete two 20-minute telephone "booster" calls within a week following a patient's ED discharge with 425 patients who screened positive for and had recent problematic substance use other than alcohol or nicotine.
Over half (56.2%) of participants completed the initial call; 66.9% of those who received the initial call also completed the second call. Median number of attempts to successfully contact participants for the first and second calls were 4 and 3, respectively. Each completed call lasted an average of about 22 minutes. Common challenges/barriers identified by booster callers included unstable housing, limited phone access, unavailability due to additional treatment, lack of compensation for booster calls, and booster calls coming from an area code different than the participants' locale and from someone other than ED staff.
Specific recommendations are presented with respect to implementing a successful centralized adjunctive booster call system. Future use of booster calls might be informed by research on contingency management (e.g., incentivizing call completions), smoking cessation quitlines, and phone-based continuing care for substance abuse patients. Future research needs to evaluate the incremental benefit of adjunctive booster calls on outcomes over and above that of brief motivational interventions delivered in the ED setting.
访后“强化”环节已被推荐用于增强急诊科(ED)所提供简短干预措施的效果。本文聚焦于实施问题,呈现了关于通过电话提供简短干预措施的描述性信息以及干预者的定性观点、挑战、“经验教训”,并为其他试图实施辅助强化电话的人提供了建议。
对425名除酒精或尼古丁外近期存在物质使用问题且筛查呈阳性的患者,在其从急诊科出院后的一周内尝试完成两次20分钟的电话“强化”通话。
超过一半(56.2%)的参与者完成了首次通话;在接到首次通话的参与者中,66.9%也完成了第二次通话。首次和第二次成功联系参与者的尝试次数中位数分别为4次和3次。每次完成的通话平均持续约22分钟。强化通话者识别出的常见挑战/障碍包括住房不稳定、电话使用受限、因接受额外治疗无法联系、强化通话缺乏补偿,以及强化电话来自与参与者所在地不同的区号且非急诊科工作人员。
针对实施成功的集中式辅助强化电话系统提出了具体建议。未来强化电话的使用可能会受到应急管理研究(如激励通话完成)、戒烟热线以及针对药物滥用患者的基于电话的持续护理研究的影响。未来的研究需要评估辅助强化电话相对于急诊科所提供简短动机性干预措施在结果方面的增量益处。