Suffoletto Brian, Kristan Jeffrey, Chung Tammy, Jeong Kwonho, Fabio Anthony, Monti Peter, Clark Duncan B
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 18;10(11):e0142877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142877. eCollection 2015.
Binge drinking is associated with numerous negative consequences. The prevalence and intensity of binge drinking is highest among young adults. This randomized trial tested the efficacy of a 12-week interactive text message intervention to reduce binge drinking up to 6 months after intervention completion among young adults.
Young adult participants (18-25 y; n = 765) drinking above the low-risk limits (AUDIT-C score >3/4 women/men), but not seeking alcohol treatment, were enrolled from 4 Emergency Departments (EDs) in Pittsburgh, PA. Participants were randomized to one of three conditions in a 2:1:1 allocation ratio: SMS Assessments + Feedback (SA+F), SMS Assessments (SA), or control. For 12 weeks, SA+F participants received texts each Thursday querying weekend drinking plans and prompting drinking limit goal commitment and each Sunday querying weekend drinking quantity. SA+F participants received tailored feedback based on their text responses. To contrast the effects of SA+F with self-monitoring, SA participants received texts on Sundays querying drinking quantity, but did not receive alcohol-specific feedback. The control arm received standard care. Follow-up outcome data collected through web-based surveys were provided by 78% of participants at 3- months, 63% at 6-months and 55% at 9-months. Multiple imputation-derived, intent-to-treat models were used for primary analysis. At 9-months, participants in the SA+F group reported greater reductions in the number of binge drinking days than participants in the control group (incident rate ratio [IRR] 0.69; 95% CI .59 to.79), lower binge drinking prevalence (odds ratio [OR] 0.52; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.98]), less drinks per drinking day (beta -.62; 95% CI -1.10 to -0.15) and lower alcohol-related injury prevalence (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.88). Participants in the SA group did not reduce drinking or alcohol-related injury relative to controls. Findings were similar using complete case analyses.
An interactive text-message intervention was more effective than self-monitoring or controls in reducing alcohol consumption and alcohol-related injury prevalence up to 6 months after intervention completion. These findings, if replicated, suggest a scalable approach to help achieve sustained reductions in binge drinking and accompanying injuries among young adults.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01688245.
暴饮与众多负面后果相关。暴饮的患病率和强度在年轻人中最高。这项随机试验测试了一种为期12周的交互式短信干预措施在干预完成后长达6个月内减少年轻人暴饮的效果。
从宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡的4个急诊科招募了饮酒量超过低风险限值(女性/男性酒精使用障碍鉴定测试-消费项目[AUDIT-C]评分>3/4)但未寻求酒精治疗的年轻成年参与者(18 - 25岁;n = 765)。参与者按2:1:1的分配比例随机分为三个组:短信评估+反馈(SA+F)组、短信评估(SA)组或对照组。在12周内,SA+F组的参与者每周四会收到询问周末饮酒计划并促使其承诺饮酒限量目标的短信,每周日会收到询问周末饮酒量的短信。SA+F组的参与者会根据其短信回复收到量身定制的反馈。为了对比SA+F组与自我监测的效果,SA组的参与者在周日收到询问饮酒量的短信,但未收到特定于酒精的反馈。对照组接受标准护理。通过基于网络的调查收集的随访结果数据,3个月时有78%的参与者提供了数据,6个月时有63%,9个月时有55%。主要分析采用多重填补推导的意向性分析模型。在9个月时,SA+F组的参与者报告的暴饮天数减少幅度大于对照组(发病率比[IRR] 0.69;95%置信区间0.59至0.79),暴饮患病率较低(优势比[OR] 0.52;95%置信区间0.26至0.98),每个饮酒日的饮酒量较少(β -0.62;95%置信区间 -1.10至 -0.15),与酒精相关的受伤患病率较低(OR 0.42;95%置信区间0.21至0.88)。SA组的参与者相对于对照组在饮酒或与酒精相关的受伤方面没有减少。采用完整病例分析时结果相似。
在干预完成后长达6个月内,交互式短信干预在减少酒精消费和与酒精相关的受伤患病率方面比自我监测或对照组更有效。这些发现如果得到重复验证,表明了一种可扩展的方法,有助于在年轻人中持续减少暴饮及随之而来的伤害。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01688245