Mullane Kathleen, Lee Christine, Bressler Adam, Buitrago Martha, Weiss Karl, Dabovic Kristina, Praestgaard Jens, Leeds Jennifer A, Blais Johanne, Pertel Peter
The University of Chicago Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, McMaster University, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Mar;59(3):1435-40. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04251-14. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
Clostridium difficile infection causes serious diarrheal disease. Although several drugs are available for treatment, including vancomycin, recurrences remain a problem. LFF571 is a semisynthetic thiopeptide with potency against C. difficile in vitro. In this phase 2 exploratory study, we compared the safety and efficacy (based on a noninferiority analysis) of LFF571 to those of vancomycin used in adults with primary episodes or first recurrences of moderate C. difficile infection. Patients were randomized to receive 200 mg of LFF571 or 125 mg of vancomycin four times daily for 10 days. The primary endpoint was the proportion of clinical cures at the end of therapy in the per-protocol population. Secondary endpoints included clinical cures at the end of therapy in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, the time to diarrhea resolution, and the recurrence rate. Seventy-two patients were randomized, with 46 assigned to receive LFF571. Based on the protocol-specified definition, the rate of clinical cure for LFF571 (90.6%) was noninferior to that of vancomycin (78.3%). The 30-day sustained cure rates for LFF571 and vancomycin were 56.7% and 65.0%, respectively, in the per-protocol population and 58.7% and 60.0%, respectively, in the modified intent-to-treat population. Using toxin-confirmed cases only, the recurrence rates were lower for LFF571 (19% versus 25% for vancomycin in the per-protocol population). LFF571 was generally safe and well tolerated. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was higher for LFF571 (76.1% versus 69.2% for vancomycin), although more AEs in the vancomycin group were suspected to be related to the study drug (38.5% versus 32.6% for LFF571). One patient receiving LFF571 discontinued the study due to an AE. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01232595.).
艰难梭菌感染会引发严重的腹泻疾病。尽管有多种药物可用于治疗,包括万古霉素,但复发仍是一个问题。LFF571是一种半合成硫肽,在体外对艰难梭菌具有活性。在这项2期探索性研究中,我们比较了LFF571与万古霉素用于中度艰难梭菌感染初发或首次复发的成人患者的安全性和疗效(基于非劣效性分析)。患者被随机分配,接受每日4次、每次200 mg的LFF571或每日4次、每次125 mg的万古霉素治疗,疗程为10天。主要终点是符合方案人群在治疗结束时的临床治愈率。次要终点包括改良意向性治疗(mITT)人群在治疗结束时的临床治愈率、腹泻缓解时间和复发率。72名患者被随机分组,其中46名被分配接受LFF571治疗。根据方案规定的定义,LFF571的临床治愈率(90.6%)不劣于万古霉素(78.3%)。在符合方案人群中,LFF571和万古霉素的30天持续治愈率分别为56.7%和65.0%,在改良意向性治疗人群中分别为58.7%和60.0%。仅使用毒素确诊的病例,LFF571的复发率较低(在符合方案人群中,LFF571为19%,万古霉素为25%)。LFF571总体上安全且耐受性良好。LFF571的不良事件(AE)发生率较高(76.1%,而万古霉素为69.2%),尽管万古霉素组更多的不良事件被怀疑与研究药物有关(38.5%,而LFF571为32.6%)。一名接受LFF571治疗的患者因不良事件退出研究。(本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT01232595。)