Spaans Anne J, van Minnen L Paul, Kon Moshe, Schuurman Arnold H, Schreuders A R Ton, Vermeulen Guus M
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam; Xpert Clinic, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam; Xpert Clinic, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Jan;40(1):16-21.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.08.047.
To provide a systematic review of randomized controlled trials regarding the conservative treatment of thumb base osteoarthritis (OA).
A systematic literature search was conducted in the electronic bibliographic databases Medline (Pubmed) and Embase (both starting year to May 2014) using predetermined criteria for studies on nonoperative treatment of thumb base OA.
Twenty-three articles fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Systematic evaluation demonstrated the following: (1) Hand therapy can possibly reduce pain. However, owing to the lack of good-quality (randomized controlled) trials with sufficient follow-up time, no proper conclusions can be drawn. (2) Although both steroid and hyaluronate intra-articular injections can provide pain relief, most authors conclude that injection of hyaluronate is more effective. Follow-up is rather short with a maximum of 12 months in 1 study. Furthermore, study comparison is hampered by heterogeneity of study design and outcome parameters. (3) The use of orthoses reduces pain without effect on function, strength, or dexterity. Included studies used various types of orthoses. Follow-up times varied (2 wk-7 y). (4) There is no justification for the use of transdermal steroid delivery. (5) There is insufficient evidence justifying the use of leech therapy. (6) There are no high-level evidence studies specifically evaluating the effect of analgesics and patient education in joint protection in patients with thumb base OA.
There are only a few high-quality studies addressing the conservative treatment of trapeziometacarpal OA. Available evidence suggests only some effect of orthoses and intra-articular hyaluronate or steroid injections.
对关于拇指腕掌关节骨关节炎(OA)保守治疗的随机对照试验进行系统评价。
在电子文献数据库Medline(PubMed)和Embase(均从起始年份至2014年5月)中进行系统的文献检索,使用关于拇指腕掌关节OA非手术治疗研究的预定标准。
23篇文章符合我们的纳入标准。系统评价表明如下:(1)手部治疗可能减轻疼痛。然而,由于缺乏具有足够随访时间的高质量(随机对照)试验,无法得出恰当结论。(2)尽管类固醇和透明质酸关节内注射均可缓解疼痛,但大多数作者认为透明质酸注射更有效。随访时间较短,1项研究中最长为12个月。此外,研究设计和结果参数的异质性阻碍了研究比较。(3)使用矫形器可减轻疼痛,但对功能、力量或灵活性无影响。纳入研究使用了各种类型的矫形器。随访时间各不相同(2周 - 7年)。(4)使用经皮类固醇给药没有依据。(5)没有足够证据证明使用水蛭疗法合理。(6)没有高级证据研究专门评估镇痛药和患者教育在拇指腕掌关节OA患者关节保护中的作用。
仅有少数高质量研究涉及大多角骨 - 第一掌骨关节OA的保守治疗。现有证据仅表明矫形器以及关节内透明质酸或类固醇注射有一定效果。