• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人手术在泌尿肿瘤学中的应用:是为了患者的利益还是为了抢占市场份额?

Robotic surgery in urological oncology: patient care or market share?

机构信息

Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Marburg 134, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Marburg 150, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Jan;12(1):55-60. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.339. Epub 2014 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1038/nrurol.2014.339
PMID:25535000
Abstract

Surgical robotic use has grown exponentially in spite of limited or uncertain benefits and large costs. In certain situations, adoption of robotic technology provides value to patients and society. In other cases, however, the robot provides little or no increase in surgical quality, with increased expense, and, therefore, does not add value to health care. The surgical robot is expensive to purchase, maintain and operate, and can contribute to increased consumerism in relation to surgical procedures, and increased reliance on the technology, thus driving future increases in health-care expenditure. Given the current need for budget constraints, the cost-effectiveness of specific procedures must be evaluated. The surgical robot should be used when cost-effective, but traditional open and laparoscopic techniques also need to be continually fostered.

摘要

尽管手术机器人的使用带来了巨大的成本,但它的应用仍然呈指数式增长,而且其带来的益处却有限或不确定。在某些情况下,采用机器人技术确实为患者和社会带来了价值。然而,在其他情况下,机器人对手术质量的提升作用很小甚至没有,却增加了成本,因此对医疗保健没有增值作用。手术机器人的购买、维护和运营成本都很高,可能会导致手术程序的消费主义增加,对技术的依赖增加,从而推动未来医疗保健支出的增加。鉴于当前预算限制的需求,必须评估特定程序的成本效益。在具有成本效益的情况下,应使用手术机器人,但也需要不断培养传统的开放和腹腔镜技术。

相似文献

1
Robotic surgery in urological oncology: patient care or market share?机器人手术在泌尿肿瘤学中的应用:是为了患者的利益还是为了抢占市场份额?
Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Jan;12(1):55-60. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.339. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
2
Cost effectiveness and robot-assisted urologic surgery: does it make dollars and sense?成本效益与机器人辅助泌尿外科手术:这划算且合理吗?
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Aug;69(4):313-323. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02866-6. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
3
Robotic surgery in urologic oncology: gathering the evidence.机器人手术在泌尿肿瘤学中的应用:证据收集。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Aug;10(4):421-32. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.46.
4
New procedures are bound to modify our attitude in facing urologic cancers in the near future: are we ready for a cost-effectiveness analysis?新的治疗方法必将在不久的将来改变我们面对泌尿系统癌症的态度:我们准备好进行成本效益分析了吗?
Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):11-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.043. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
5
Cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures in urologic surgery in the USA.美国泌尿外科机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的成本效益。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2011 Jan;8(1):97-103. doi: 10.1586/erd.10.67.
6
Utilization and costs associated with robotic surgery in children.儿童机器人手术的使用情况及相关费用。
J Surg Res. 2015 Nov;199(1):169-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.087. Epub 2015 May 6.
7
A comparative direct cost analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive?小儿泌尿外科机器人辅助腹腔镜手术与开放手术的直接成本比较分析:机器人辅助手术是否更便宜?
J Endourol. 2012 Jul;26(7):871-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0584. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
8
Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.机器人辅助腹腔镜与经腹子宫骶骨固定术的成本最小化分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):493-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.011.
9
Minimally Invasive Techniques in Urology.泌尿外科微创技术
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2019 Apr;28(2):327-332. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2018.11.012. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
10
Is robotic surgery cost-effective: no.机器人手术是否具有成本效益:否。
Curr Opin Urol. 2012 Jan;22(1):66-9. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834d4d76.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of omentum during robotic-assisted reconstructive urological surgery: a systematic review of the current literature.机器人辅助重建泌尿外科手术中使用网膜:当前文献的系统评价。
World J Urol. 2024 Nov 4;42(1):620. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05335-0.
2
Suitability of the MP1000 Platform for Robot-assisted Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial.MP1000平台用于机器人辅助前列腺切除术的适用性:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Apr 25;64:2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.017. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Robotic-assisted vs. open ureteral reimplantation: a multicentre comparison.

本文引用的文献

1
Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: multicenter experience in Turkey including 1,499 patients.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤学结果、功能结局及并发症发生率:土耳其多中心经验,纳入1499例患者。
World J Urol. 2015 Aug;33(8):1095-102. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1393-3. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
2
A randomized trial of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的一项随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 24;371(4):389-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1405213.
3
Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.
机器人辅助与开放输尿管再植术:多中心比较。
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 26;42(1):194. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04875-9.
4
A multimodal virtual vision platform as a next-generation vision system for a surgical robot.一种多模态虚拟视觉平台,作为手术机器人的下一代视觉系统。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024 May;62(5):1535-1548. doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03030-1. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
5
Navigating Now and Next: Recent Advances and Future Horizons in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.把握当下与未来:机器人根治性前列腺切除术的最新进展与未来展望
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 9;13(2):359. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020359.
6
Market potentials of robotic systems in medical science: analysis of the Avatera robotic system.机器人系统在医学领域的市场潜力:Avatera 机器人系统分析。
World J Urol. 2022 Jan;40(1):283-289. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03809-z. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
7
Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy versus open simple prostatectomy: a single-center comparison.机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术与开放性单纯前列腺切除术的单中心比较。
World J Urol. 2021 Jan;39(1):149-156. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03168-1. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
8
Considering the role of radical prostatectomy in 21st century prostate cancer care.考虑在 21 世纪前列腺癌治疗中根治性前列腺切除术的作用。
Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Mar;17(3):177-188. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0287-y. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
9
Effect of patient choice and hospital competition on service configuration and technology adoption within cancer surgery: a national, population-based study.患者选择与医院竞争对癌症手术服务配置和技术采用的影响:一项基于全国人群的研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):1445-1453. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30572-7. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
10
Transoral robotic surgery for the base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary comparison between da Vinci Xi and Si.经口机器人手术治疗舌根鳞状细胞癌:达芬奇Xi系统与Si系统的初步比较
J Robot Surg. 2018 Sep;12(3):417-423. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0750-9. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术 10 年后的肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1168-1176. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.025. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
4
Diffusion of surgical innovations, patient safety, and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.手术创新的传播、患者安全和微创根治性前列腺切除术。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Aug;149(8):845-51. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.31.
5
Minimally invasive cystectomy is associated with improved perioperative patient safety outcomes compared with open cystectomy in a national cohort.与开放性膀胱切除术相比,在全国范围内的队列研究中,微创膀胱切除术与改善围手术期患者安全结局相关。
Urology. 2014 Aug;84(2):314-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.048. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
6
Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in the postdissemination era.机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术在传播后时代的比较效果。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;32(14):1419-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5096. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
7
Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤学结局比较:一项按手术经验分层的分析
World J Urol. 2014 Feb;32(1):193-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1168-2. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
8
Use of advanced treatment technologies among men at low risk of dying from prostate cancer.在低死亡风险的前列腺癌男性中使用先进的治疗技术。
JAMA. 2013 Jun 26;309(24):2587-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6882.
9
Trends in immediate perioperative morbidity and delay in discharge after open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (RP): a 20-year institutional experience.开放和微创根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后即刻围手术期发病率和延迟出院的趋势:20 年的机构经验。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(1):45-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11767.x.
10
Comparative cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of men with localised prostate cancer: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the UK National Health Service.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与标准腹腔镜前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的成本效果比较:来自英国国家医疗服务体系的卫生技术评估。
Eur Urol. 2013 Sep;64(3):361-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.02.040. Epub 2013 Mar 7.