Yoo In-Young, Lee Young-Mi
Jeonju University, Hyoja-dong, 3Ga, 1200, Jeongu 560-759, South Korea.
Gordon Center for Research in Medical Education, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th St, Miami 33136, USA.
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Feb;35(2):e19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
Mobile applications can be used as effective simulations for nursing education. However, little is known regarding the effects of mobile application-mediated training on nursing. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of mobile applications by comparing the effectiveness of a high-fidelity human patient simulator to that of a mobile application on student learning.
Following lectures on the lungs and the heart, twenty-two students were separated into two groups to perform a simulation exercise. Then, the students' education effects were evaluated based on their knowledge of lung and heart assessments, their clinical assessment skill, and satisfaction with their education.
After four weeks, the mobile application group maintained their knowledge, whereas the high-fidelity human patient simulator group exhibited significantly decreased knowledge of the lung assessment. Knowledge of the heart assessment was significantly increased in both groups. There was no significant difference in clinical assessment skill or educational satisfaction between the groups.
We found that mobile applications provide educational tools similarly effective to a high-fidelity human patient simulator to maintain memory and to teach cardiopulmonary assessment skills.
移动应用程序可作为护理教育的有效模拟工具。然而,关于移动应用程序介导的培训对护理的影响知之甚少。本研究的目的是通过比较高保真人体患者模拟器与移动应用程序对学生学习的有效性,来确定移动应用程序的有效性。
在进行关于肺部和心脏的讲座后,22名学生被分成两组进行模拟练习。然后,根据学生对肺部和心脏评估的知识、临床评估技能以及对教育的满意度来评估学生的教育效果。
四周后,移动应用程序组保持了他们的知识水平,而高保真人体患者模拟器组对肺部评估的知识显著下降。两组的心脏评估知识均显著增加。两组之间的临床评估技能或教育满意度没有显著差异。
我们发现移动应用程序提供的教育工具与高保真人体患者模拟器同样有效,可用于维持记忆和教授心肺评估技能。