Suppr超能文献

磺酰脲类药物在 2 型糖尿病患者中是否仍可作为二甲双胍治疗的一种可接受的一线附加治疗?是的,它们仍然为我们提供了很好的服务!

Should sulfonylureas remain an acceptable first-line add-on to metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes? Yes, they continue to serve us well!

机构信息

Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38(1):166-9. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1945.

Abstract

Since their introduction to clinical practice in the 1950s, sulfonylureas have been widely prescribed for use in patients with type 2 diabetes. Of all the other medications currently available for clinical use, only metformin has been used more frequently. However, several new drug classes have emerged that are reported to have equal glucose-lowering efficacy and greater safety when added to treatment of patients in whom metformin monotherapy is no longer sufficient. Moreover, current arguments also suggest that the alternative drugs may be superior to sulfonylureas with regard to the risk of cardiovascular complications. Thus, while there is universal agreement that metformin should remain the first-line pharmacologic therapy for those in whom lifestyle modification is insufficient to control hyperglycemia, there is no consensus as to which drug should be added to metformin. Therefore, given the current controversy, we provide a Point-Counterpoint on this issue. In the point narrative presented below, Dr. Abrahamson provides his argument suggesting that avoiding use of sulfonylureas as a class of medication as an add-on to metformin is not appropriate as there are many patients whose glycemic control would improve with use of these drugs with minimal risk of adverse events. In the following counterpoint narrative, Dr. Genuth suggests there is no longer a need for sulfonylureas to remain a first-line addition to metformin for those patients whose clinical characteristics are appropriate and whose health insurance and/or financial resources make an alternative drug affordable.

摘要

自 20 世纪 50 年代引入临床实践以来,磺酰脲类药物已被广泛用于治疗 2 型糖尿病患者。在目前所有可用于临床的其他药物中,只有二甲双胍的使用更为频繁。然而,已经出现了几种新的药物类别,据报道,在二甲双胍单药治疗不再足够的患者中,这些药物在降糖方面具有同等疗效,且安全性更高。此外,目前的观点还表明,与磺酰脲类药物相比,这些替代药物在心血管并发症风险方面可能更具优势。因此,尽管普遍认为二甲双胍应该仍然是生活方式改变不足以控制高血糖的患者的一线药物治疗,但对于应该添加哪种药物,尚无共识。因此,鉴于目前的争议,我们就这个问题提供了一个观点交锋。在下面呈现的观点叙述中,Abrahamson 博士提出了他的观点,即避免将磺酰脲类药物作为一类添加药物与二甲双胍联合使用是不合适的,因为有许多患者的血糖控制可以通过使用这些药物得到改善,而不良反应的风险最小。在下面的反驳观点叙述中,Genuth 博士认为,对于那些临床特征合适且其健康保险和/或财务资源能够负担得起替代药物的患者,磺酰脲类药物不再需要作为二甲双胍的一线添加药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验