Department of Medicine, Movement and Sport Science, University of Fribourg Fribourg, Switzerland.
Department of Sport Science, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Dec 4;8:972. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00972. eCollection 2014.
For consciously performed motor tasks executed in a defined and constant way, both motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) have been shown to promote motor learning. It is not known whether these forms of non-physical training also improve motor actions when these actions have to be variably applied in an unstable and unpredictable environment. The present study therefore investigated the influence of MI balance training (MI_BT) and a balance training combining AO and MI (AO+MI_BT) on postural control of undisturbed and disturbed upright stance on unstable ground. As spinal reflex excitability after classical (i.e., physical) balance training (BT) is generally decreased, we tested whether non-physical BT also has an impact on spinal reflex circuits. Thirty-six participants were randomly allocated into an MI_BT group, in which participants imagined postural exercises, an AO+MI_BT group, in which participants observed videos of other people performing balance exercises and imagined being the person in the video, and a non-active control group (CON). Before and after 4 weeks of non-physical training, balance performance was assessed on a free-moving platform during stance without perturbation and during perturbed stance. Soleus H-reflexes were recorded during stable and unstable stance. The post-measurement revealed significantly decreased postural sway during undisturbed and disturbed stance after both MI_BT and AO+MI_BT. Spinal reflex excitability remained unchanged. This is the first study showing that non-physical training (MI_BT and AO+MI_BT) not only promotes motor learning of "rigid" postural tasks but also improves performance of highly variable and unpredictable balance actions. These findings may be relevant to improve postural control and thus reduce the risk of falls in temporarily immobilized patients.
对于以明确且恒定的方式执行的有意识的运动任务,运动想象(MI)和动作观察(AO)都已被证明可以促进运动学习。目前尚不清楚这些非物理训练形式是否也可以改善必须在不稳定和不可预测的环境中灵活应用的运动动作。因此,本研究调查了 MI 平衡训练(MI_BT)和结合 AO 和 MI 的平衡训练(AO+MI_BT)对在不稳定地面上的未受干扰和受干扰的直立姿势的姿势控制的影响。由于经典(即物理)平衡训练(BT)后的脊髓反射兴奋性通常降低,因此我们测试了非物理 BT 是否也对脊髓反射回路有影响。36 名参与者被随机分配到 MI_BT 组,其中参与者想象姿势练习,AO+MI_BT 组,其中参与者观察其他人进行平衡练习的视频并想象自己是视频中的人,以及非活跃对照组(CON)。在 4 周的非物理训练之前和之后,在没有干扰的情况下和在受干扰的情况下,在自由移动平台上评估站立平衡。在稳定和不稳定的站立时记录比目鱼肌 H 反射。测量后发现,在 MI_BT 和 AO+MI_BT 之后,未受干扰和受干扰的站立时的姿势摆动明显减小。脊髓反射兴奋性保持不变。这是第一项表明非物理训练(MI_BT 和 AO+MI_BT)不仅可以促进“刚性”姿势任务的运动学习,还可以改善高度可变和不可预测的平衡动作的表现的研究。这些发现可能与改善姿势控制有关,从而降低暂时固定患者跌倒的风险。