• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cross-sectional investigation of HEMS activities in Europe: a feasibility study.欧洲直升机紧急医疗服务活动的横断面调查:一项可行性研究。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:201570. doi: 10.1155/2014/201570. Epub 2014 Nov 30.
2
[Air rescue: current significance and practical issues].[空中救援:当前的意义与实际问题]
Anaesthesist. 2014 Dec;63(12):971-80; quiz 981-2. doi: 10.1007/s00101-014-2356-1.
3
Perceptions and culture of safety among helicopter emergency medical service personnel in the UK.英国直升机紧急医疗服务人员对安全的认知与文化
Emerg Med J. 2016 Nov;33(11):801-806. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204959. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
4
Utilisation of a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) for equestrian accidents in a regional major trauma network in the United Kingdom.在英国一个地区性重大创伤网络中,直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)在马术事故中的应用。
Injury. 2015 May;46(5):781-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.067. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
5
Ten years of helicopter emergency medical services in Germany: do we still need the helicopter rescue in multiple traumatised patients?德国直升机紧急医疗服务十年:对于多处创伤患者,我们仍需要直升机救援吗?
Injury. 2014 Oct;45 Suppl 3:S53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.018.
6
The cost-effectiveness of physician staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) transport to a major trauma centre in NSW, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州配备医生的直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)转运至主要创伤中心的成本效益。
Injury. 2012 Nov;43(11):1843-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.07.184. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
7
[Helicopter emergency medical service missions at night: 2 years of experience in the Dutch Regional Emergency Healthcare Network East].[夜间直升机紧急医疗服务任务:荷兰东部地区紧急医疗网络的两年经验]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A2149.
8
Prehospital response model and time to CT scan in blunt trauma patients; an exploratory analysis of data from the head injury retrieval trial.钝性创伤患者的院前反应模式及CT扫描时间;颅脑损伤检索试验数据的探索性分析
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Mar 20;23:28. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0107-1.
9
Defining a mission-based method to determine a HEMS unit's actual service area.定义一种基于任务的方法,以确定 HEMS 单位的实际服务区域。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Jul 1;27(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0640-4.
10
[Pediatric prehospital trauma care. A retrospective comparison of air and ground transportation].[儿科院前创伤护理。空中与地面转运的回顾性比较]
Unfallchirurg. 2002 Nov;105(11):1000-6. doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0520-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Same standards - different outcomes? Why clinical governance is essential to safe and consistent high-quality patient care : A call for a european governance alliance in HEMS.相同的标准——不同的结果?为何临床治理对安全且一致的高质量患者护理至关重要:呼吁在直升机紧急医疗服务领域建立欧洲治理联盟。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 2;33(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01421-3.
2
Nordic physician-staffed prehospital services - organisation and preparedness for major emergency surgical procedures.北欧由医生配备的院前急救服务——重大急诊外科手术的组织与准备
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 May 23;33(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01416-0.
3
Loss of consciousness in a helicopter pilot as plausible first sign of insulinoma: a case report.直升机驾驶员意识丧失可能是胰岛素瘤的首个征象:病例报告。
Med Lav. 2022 Feb 22;113(1):e2022007. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v113i1.12037.
4
Template for documenting and reporting data in physician-staffed pre-hospital services: a consensus-based update.记录和报告医师配备的院前服务数据的模板:基于共识的更新。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 3;28(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-0716-1.
5
Collecting core data in physician-staffed pre-hospital helicopter emergency medical services using a consensus-based template: international multicentre feasibility study in Finland and Norway.使用基于共识的模板在配备医生的院前直升机紧急医疗服务中收集核心数据:芬兰和挪威的国际多中心可行性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 8;19(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3976-6.
6
Changes in anaesthetic use for trauma patients in German HEMS - a retrospective study over a ten-year period.德国 HEMS 创伤患者麻醉使用的变化——一项十年回顾性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Feb 26;27(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0603-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Helicopter emergency medical services for adults with major trauma.为严重创伤的成年人提供直升机紧急医疗服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD009228. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009228.pub2.
2
Association between helicopter vs ground emergency medical services and survival for adults with major trauma.直升机与地面紧急医疗服务对创伤成年人存活率的影响关联。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1602-1610. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.467.
3
Helicopter EMS: Research Endpoints and Potential Benefits.直升机紧急医疗服务:研究终点与潜在益处
Emerg Med Int. 2012;2012:698562. doi: 10.1155/2012/698562. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
4
Is it the H or the EMS in HEMS that has an impact on trauma patient mortality? A systematic review of the evidence.是 HEMS 中的 H 还是 EMS 对创伤患者死亡率有影响?系统评价证据。
Emerg Med J. 2010 Sep;27(9):692-701. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.087486. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
5
A systematic review of the costs and benefits of helicopter emergency medical services.直升机紧急医疗服务的成本与效益的系统评价。
Injury. 2010 Jan;41(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.09.030.
6
Effects of 2 patterns of prehospital care on the outcome of patients with severe head injury.两种院前护理模式对重度颅脑损伤患者预后的影响。
Arch Surg. 2001 Nov;136(11):1293-300. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.11.1293.

欧洲直升机紧急医疗服务活动的横断面调查:一项可行性研究。

Cross-sectional investigation of HEMS activities in Europe: a feasibility study.

作者信息

Di Bartolomeo Stefano, Gava Paolo, Truhlář Anatolij, Sandberg Mårten

机构信息

Department of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Holterveien 24, P.O. Box 94, 1441 Drøbak, Norway ; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Udine, Piazza SM Misericordia 15, 33100 Udine, Italy.

Department of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Holterveien 24, P.O. Box 94, 1441 Drøbak, Norway.

出版信息

ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:201570. doi: 10.1155/2014/201570. Epub 2014 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1155/2014/201570
PMID:25538947
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4265707/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To gather information on helicopter emergency medical services (HEMSs) activities across Europe.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data-collection on daily (15 November 2013) activities of a sample of European HEMSs. A web-based questionnaire with both open and closed questions was used, developed by experts of the European Prehospital Research Alliance (EUPHOREA).

RESULTS

We invited 143 bases from 11 countries; 85 (60%) reported base characteristics only and 73 (51%) sample-day data too. The variety of base characteristics was enormous; that is, the target population ranged from 94.000 to 4.500.000. Of 158 requested primary missions, 62 (0.82 per base) resulted in landing. Cardiac aetiology (36%) and trauma (36%) prevailed, mostly of life-threatening severity (43%, 0.64 per mission). Had HEMS been not dispatched, patients would have been attended by another physician in 67% of cases, by paramedics in 24%, and by nurses in 9%. On-board physicians estimated to have caused a major decrease of death risk in 47% of missions, possible decrease in 22%, minor benefit in 17%, no benefit in 11%, and damage in 3%. Earlier treatment and faster transport to hospital were the main reasons for benefit. The most frequent therapeutic procedure was drug administration (78% of missions); endotracheal intubation occurred in 25% of missions and was an option hardly offered by ground crews.

CONCLUSIONS

The study proved feasible, establishing an embryonic network of European HEMS. The participation rate was low and limits the generalizability of the results. Fortunately, because of its cross-sectional characteristics and the handy availability of the web platform, the study is easily repeatable with an enhanced network.

摘要

目的

收集有关欧洲直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)活动的信息。

方法

对欧洲HEMS样本的日常(2013年11月15日)活动进行横断面数据收集。使用了由欧洲院前研究联盟(EUPHOREA)专家开发的基于网络的问卷,该问卷包含开放式和封闭式问题。

结果

我们邀请了来自11个国家的143个基地;85个(60%)仅报告了基地特征,73个(51%)还报告了样本日数据。基地特征的差异很大;也就是说,目标人群从94000到4500000不等。在158次请求的主要任务中,62次(每个基地0.82次)成功降落。心脏病因(36%)和创伤(36%)占主导,大多为危及生命的严重程度(43%,每次任务0.64次)。如果未派遣HEMS,67%的病例将由另一名医生诊治,24%由护理人员诊治,9%由护士诊治。机上医生估计在47%的任务中使死亡风险大幅降低,22%可能降低,17%有轻微益处,11%无益处,3%有损害。早期治疗和更快送往医院是获益的主要原因。最常见的治疗程序是药物给药(78%的任务);气管插管发生在25%的任务中,而地面人员很少提供这种选择。

结论

该研究证明可行,建立了欧洲HEMS的初步网络。参与率较低,限制了结果的普遍性。幸运的是,由于其横断面特征和网络平台的便捷可用性,该研究可以通过扩大网络轻松重复进行。