• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼻咽癌患者出现咽后淋巴结转移:与 5mm 相比,最小轴向直径 6mm 是更准确的预后预测指标。

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with retropharyngeal lymph node metastases: a minimum axial diameter of 6 mm is a more accurate prognostic predictor than 5 mm.

机构信息

1 Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):20-3. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12936.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.14.12936
PMID:25539232
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The criteria for the diagnosis of metastatic retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RLNs) have not yet been resolved and are not included in the current edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (seventh edition) for the staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The aim of this study was to use MRI to identify an RLN size criterion that can accurately predict prognosis in patients with NPC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight hundred seventeen patients with newly diagnosed localized NPC were identified. All of the patients underwent MRI before treatment with definitive radiation therapy. All the MRI studies and medical records were reviewed retrospectively. Overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and local relapse-free survival (LRFS) were assessed using SPSS software (version 17.0).

RESULTS

RLN size cutoffs of ≥ 5 mm and of ≥ 6 mm were used. There was no significant difference in OS (p = 0.216), DMFS (p = 0.081), or LRFS (p = 0.067) in patients with RLNs ≥ 5 mm and in those with RLNs < 5 mm. When 6 mm was used as a size cutoff, significant differences in OS (p = 0.000) and DMFS (p = 0.001) were identified; there was no significant difference observed for LRFS (p = 0.380).

CONCLUSION

A minimum axial RLN diameter of 6 mm was a more accurate prognostic predictor in NPC patients with RLN metastases than 5 mm.

摘要

目的

转移性咽后淋巴结(RLN)的诊断标准尚未确定,也未包含在当前版的美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统(第七版)中,该系统用于分期鼻咽癌(NPC)。本研究旨在使用 MRI 确定一个 RLN 大小标准,该标准可准确预测 NPC 患者的预后。

材料与方法

共确定了 817 例新诊断为局限性 NPC 的患者。所有患者在接受根治性放射治疗前均进行了 MRI 检查。回顾性分析所有 MRI 研究和病历。使用 SPSS 软件(版本 17.0)评估总生存率(OS)、远处无转移生存率(DMFS)和局部无复发生存率(LRFS)。

结果

分别使用 RLN 大小≥5mm 和≥6mm 作为截断值。RLN≥5mm 与 RLN<5mm 的患者在 OS(p=0.216)、DMFS(p=0.081)或 LRFS(p=0.067)方面无显著差异。当将 6mm 作为截断值时,在 OS(p=0.000)和 DMFS(p=0.001)方面存在显著差异,而在 LRFS(p=0.380)方面无显著差异。

结论

与 RLN<5mm 的 NPC 患者相比,RLN 转移患者的最小轴向 RLN 直径 6mm 是更准确的预后预测指标。

相似文献

1
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with retropharyngeal lymph node metastases: a minimum axial diameter of 6 mm is a more accurate prognostic predictor than 5 mm.鼻咽癌患者出现咽后淋巴结转移:与 5mm 相比,最小轴向直径 6mm 是更准确的预后预测指标。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):20-3. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12936.
2
Promising treatment outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with N0 disease according to the seventh edition of the AJCC staging system.根据第七版 AJCC 分期系统,调强放疗治疗 N0 期鼻咽癌患者的治疗效果令人鼓舞。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Feb 15;12:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-68.
3
Involvement of both cervical lymph nodes and retropharyngeal lymph nodes has prognostic value for N1 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.颈淋巴结和咽后淋巴结均受累对鼻咽癌N1期患者具有预后价值。
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan 6;9:7. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-7.
4
Retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma detected by magnetic resonance imaging : prognostic value and staging categories.磁共振成像检测鼻咽癌咽后淋巴结转移:预后价值及分期类别
Cancer. 2008 Jul 15;113(2):347-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23555.
5
Prognostic value and staging classification of retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.调强放疗治疗鼻咽癌患者咽后淋巴结转移的预后价值及分期分类
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 10;9(10):e108375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108375. eCollection 2014.
6
Prognostic value of retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis laterality in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and a proposed modification to the UICC/AJCC N staging system.颈后淋巴结转移侧别的预后价值在鼻咽癌中的应用及对 UICC/AJCC N 分期系统的修正建议。
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Nov;140:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.024. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
7
Prognostic value of MRI-derived masticator space involvement in IMRT-treated nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.MRI 显示的咀嚼肌间隙受累情况对接受调强放疗的鼻咽癌患者的预后价值
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Sep 25;10:204. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0513-6.
8
Retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: prognostic value and staging categories.鼻咽癌的咽后淋巴结转移:预后价值及分期类别
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Mar 1;13(5):1445-52. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2059.
9
Radiologic criteria of retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiation therapy.放疗后鼻咽癌咽后淋巴结转移的放射学标准。
Radiology. 2010 May;255(2):605-12. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10090289.
10
Optimal Size Threshold for MRI-Detected Retropharyngeal Lymph Nodes to Predict Outcomes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Two-Center Study.MRI 检测的咽后淋巴结大小对鼻咽癌预后的最佳预测阈值:一项两中心研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2024 Jan;222(1):e2329984. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29984. Epub 2023 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative Spatial Characterization of Lymph Node Tumor for N Stage Improvement of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients.鼻咽癌患者N分期改进中淋巴结肿瘤的定量空间特征分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 30;15(1):230. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010230.
2
Recurrence risk stratification based on Epstein-Barr virus DNA to identify enlarged retropharyngeal lymph nodes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A model-histopathologic correlation study.基于爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒DNA的复发风险分层以识别鼻咽癌的咽后淋巴结肿大:一项模型-组织病理学相关性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 1;9:996127. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.996127. eCollection 2022.
3
[Endoscopic transoral retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy].
[内镜经口咽后淋巴结清扫术]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Feb;36(2):81-86. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.02.001.
4
Verification of the Efficacy of New Diagnostic Criteria for Retropharyngeal Nodes in a Cohort of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients.验证新的咽后淋巴结诊断标准在鼻咽癌患者队列中的疗效。
Int J Med Sci. 2021 Aug 13;18(15):3463-3469. doi: 10.7150/ijms.58375. eCollection 2021.
5
The value of CT, MRI, and PET-CT in detecting retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.CT、MRI 和 PET-CT 在检测头颈部鳞状细胞癌咽后淋巴结转移中的价值。
BMC Med Imaging. 2020 Jul 29;20(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-00487-y.
6
Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Detection of Retropharyngeal Lymph Node Metastases in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients.对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT)与磁共振成像(MRI)在鼻咽癌患者咽后淋巴结转移检测中的评估
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Mar 9;12:1733-1739. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S244034. eCollection 2020.
7
Can Parameters Other than Minimal Axial Diameter in MRI and PET/CT Further Improve Diagnostic Accuracy for Equivocal Retropharyngeal Lymph Nodes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma?MRI和PET/CT中除最小轴向直径之外的参数能否进一步提高鼻咽癌模棱两可的咽后淋巴结的诊断准确性?
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 13;11(10):e0163741. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163741. eCollection 2016.
8
The diagnostic value of 1.5-T diffusion-weighted MR imaging in detecting 5 to 10 mm metastatic cervical lymph nodes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.1.5-T扩散加权磁共振成像在检测鼻咽癌5至10毫米转移性颈部淋巴结中的诊断价值
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(32):e4286. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004286.