Bruno Agostino, Calicchia Alessio
Private Practice in Rome, Clinica Santa Maria di Leuca, Via Tiberina 173, 00188, Rome, Italy.
Plastic Surgery, Department of surgical sciences, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05085-3.
Brachioplasty is a critical procedure for upper-arm contouring, particularly in patients with significant skin redundancy following massive weight loss. Different incision techniques-posterior, medial, and postero-medial-offer unique advantages and limitations in balancing aesthetic outcomes, functional improvement, and complication rates.
This study aims to compare the functional and aesthetic outcomes of posterior, medial, and postero-medial brachioplasty techniques to determine the most effective approach based on patient satisfaction, scar visibility, and postoperative healing.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 90 patients who underwent brachioplasty between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into three groups based on incision type: posterior (n=30), medial (n=30), and postero-medial (n=30). Outcomes were assessed using the BODY-Q scar satisfaction module, range of motion (ROM) measurements, and surgeon-assessed scar visibility. Complications, including wound dehiscence and hypertrophic scarring, were also evaluated.
The postero-medial approach showed superior outcomes, with 92% of patients rating results as "excellent" or "very good" compared to 72% for the medial group and 58% for the posterior group (p < 0.001). Scar visibility was minimal in the postero-medial group, with lower rates of wound dehiscence (3%) and hypertrophic scarring (5%). Functional improvements were also highest in the postero-medial group, with a mean ROM increase of 18° ± 2° compared to 12° ± 3° in the posterior group (p < 0.01).
The postero-medial approach offers the best balance between aesthetic and functional outcomes while minimizing complications. It is recommended as the preferred technique for upper-arm contouring in patients with moderate to severe skin redundancy.
Aesthetic scar placement, optimal access to adipose tissue and excess skin, preservation of neurovascular structures.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
上臂整形术是上臂塑形的关键手术,对于大量减重后皮肤严重冗余的患者尤为重要。不同的切口技术——后侧、内侧以及后内侧——在平衡美学效果、功能改善和并发症发生率方面具有独特的优势和局限性。
本研究旨在比较后侧、内侧和后内侧上臂整形术技术的功能和美学效果,以根据患者满意度、瘢痕可见度和术后愈合情况确定最有效的方法。
对2018年至2023年间接受上臂整形术的90例患者进行回顾性队列研究。根据切口类型将患者分为三组:后侧组(n = 30)、内侧组(n = 30)和后内侧组(n = 30)。使用BODY-Q瘢痕满意度模块、活动范围(ROM)测量以及外科医生评估的瘢痕可见度来评估结果。还评估了包括伤口裂开和增生性瘢痕形成在内的并发症。
后内侧入路显示出更好的效果,92%的患者将结果评为“优秀”或“非常好”,而内侧组为72%,后侧组为58%(p < 0.001)。后内侧组的瘢痕可见度最小,伤口裂开率(3%)和增生性瘢痕形成率(5%)较低。后内侧组的功能改善也最为显著,平均ROM增加18°±2°,而后侧组为12°±3°(p < 0.01)。
后内侧入路在美学和功能效果之间提供了最佳平衡,同时将并发症降至最低。对于中度至重度皮肤冗余的患者,建议将其作为上臂塑形的首选技术。
美学瘢痕位置、对脂肪组织和多余皮肤的最佳暴露、神经血管结构的保留。
证据级别IV:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据级别。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南www.springer.com/00266 。