• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

持续改进?重温延雪平20年质量改进计划。

Sustaining improvement? The 20-year Jönköping quality improvement program revisited.

作者信息

Staines Anthony, Thor Johan, Robert Glenn

机构信息

University Lyon III, France and Fédération des hôpitaux vaudois, Prilly, Switzerland (Dr Staines); Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, and The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Sweden (Dr Thor); and National Nursing Research Unit, King's College, London, United Kingdom (Pr. Robert).

出版信息

Qual Manag Health Care. 2015 Jan-Mar;24(1):21-37. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000048.

DOI:10.1097/QMH.0000000000000048
PMID:25539488
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is scarce evidence of organization-wide and sustained impact of quality improvement (QI) programs in health care. For 20 years, the Jönköping County Council's (Sweden) ambitious program has attracted attention from practitioners and researchers alike.

METHODS

This is a follow-up case of a 2006 study of Jönköping's improvement program, triangulating data from 20 semi-structured interviews, observation and secondary analysis of internal performance data.

RESULTS

In 2010, clinical outcomes had clearly improved in 2 departments (pediatrics, intensive care), while process improvements were evident in many departments. In an overall index of the 20 Swedish county councils' performance, Jönköping had improved its ranking since 2006 to lead in 2010. Five key issues shaped Jönköping's improvement program since 2006: a rigorously managed succession of chief executive officer; adept management of a changing external context; clear strategic direction relating to integration; a broadened conceptualization of "quality" (incorporating clinical effectiveness, patient safety, and patient experience); and continuing investment in QI education and research. Physician involvement in formal QI initiatives had increased since 2006 but remained a challenge in 2010. A new clinical information system was being deployed but had not yet met expectations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that ambitious approaches can carry health care organizations beyond the sustainability threshold.

摘要

背景

几乎没有证据表明医疗保健领域的质量改进(QI)计划能在整个组织范围内产生持续影响。20年来,瑞典延雪平郡议会的宏伟计划吸引了从业者和研究人员的关注。

方法

这是对2006年延雪平改进计划研究的后续案例,对来自20次半结构化访谈、观察以及内部绩效数据的二次分析的数据进行三角测量。

结果

2010年,两个科室(儿科、重症监护)的临床结果明显改善,而许多科室的流程也有明显改进。在瑞典20个郡议会的整体绩效指数中,延雪平自2006年以来提升了排名,并在2010年领先。自2006年以来,五个关键问题塑造了延雪平的改进计划:对首席执行官进行严格管理的继任;妥善应对不断变化的外部环境;与整合相关的明确战略方向;对“质量”的概念进行拓展(纳入临床疗效、患者安全和患者体验);以及对质量改进教育和研究的持续投资。自2006年以来,医生参与正式质量改进计划的情况有所增加,但在2010年仍是一项挑战。一个新的临床信息系统正在部署,但尚未达到预期。

结论

本研究表明,雄心勃勃的方法可以使医疗保健组织超越可持续性门槛。

相似文献

1
Sustaining improvement? The 20-year Jönköping quality improvement program revisited.持续改进?重温延雪平20年质量改进计划。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2015 Jan-Mar;24(1):21-37. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000048.
2
Quality improvement for patient safety: project-level versus program-level learning.患者安全质量改进:项目层面与项目层面学习。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Jan-Mar;38(1):40-50. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e318245019f.
3
Sustaining a quality improvement culture in local health departments applying for accreditation.在申请认证的地方卫生部门维持质量改进文化。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):43-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182a5a4a0.
4
The influence of corporate structure and quality improvement activities on outcome improvement in residential care homes.企业结构和质量改进活动对养老院结果改善的影响。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Aug;26(4):378-87. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu057. Epub 2014 May 28.
5
Sustained improvement? Findings from an independent case study of the Jönköping quality program.持续改进?延雪平质量计划独立案例研究的结果
Qual Manag Health Care. 2007 Jan-Mar;16(1):68-83. doi: 10.1097/00019514-200701000-00009.
6
Strategies to facilitate implementation and sustainability of large system transformations: a case study of a national program for improving quality of care for elderly people.促进大型系统变革实施与可持续性的策略:一项改善老年人护理质量国家项目的案例研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 18;14:401. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-401.
7
An exploratory analysis of the model for understanding success in quality.质量成功理解模型的探索性分析
Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Oct-Dec;38(4):325-38. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182689772.
8
Strategies for sustaining a quality improvement collaborative and its patient safety gains.维持质量改进协作及其患者安全收益的策略。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Aug;24(4):380-90. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs030. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
9
Quality as strategy, the evolution of co-production in the Region Jönköping health system, Sweden: a descriptive qualitative study.质量即策略:瑞典约恩奥普市卫生系统中共同生产的演变——一项描述性定性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Nov 29;33(Supplement_2):ii15-ii22. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab060.
10
Evolution and outcomes of a quality improvement program.质量改进项目的演变与成果
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010;23(3):312-27. doi: 10.1108/09526861011029370.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Different Levels of Contact Frequency in Multiple Sclerosis Care.探索多发性硬化症护理中不同程度的接触频率。
Brain Behav. 2025 Jul;15(7):e70634. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70634.
2
What is best for Esther? A simple question that moves mindsets and improves care.埃丝特最好的选择是什么?一个简单的问题,却能改变思维模式,改善护理。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 17;23(1):873. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09870-1.
3
Lived experience of persons with multiple sclerosis: A qualitative interview study.多发性硬化症患者的生活体验:一项定性访谈研究。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jul;13(7):e3104. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3104. Epub 2023 May 29.
4
Sustaining improvement of hospital-wide initiative for patient safety and quality: a systematic scoping review.持续改进全院范围内的患者安全和质量倡议:系统范围界定审查。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Dec;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002057.
5
The development of the concept of return-on-investment from large-scale quality improvement programmes in healthcare: an integrative systematic literature review.从医疗保健领域的大规模质量改进计划看投资回报率的概念发展:综合系统文献回顾
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 7;22(1):1492. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08832-3.
6
Identifying and understanding benefits associated with return-on-investment from large-scale healthcare Quality Improvement programmes: an integrative systematic literature review.识别和理解与大型医疗保健质量改进计划投资回报率相关的收益:综合系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 24;22(1):1083. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08171-3.
7
Using stakeholders' experiences to redesign health services for persons living with heart failure: a case study protocol in a Swedish cardiac care setting.利用利益相关者的经验重新设计心力衰竭患者的医疗服务:瑞典心脏护理环境中的案例研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 15;12(3):e058469. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058469.
8
Quality as strategy, the evolution of co-production in the Region Jönköping health system, Sweden: a descriptive qualitative study.质量即策略:瑞典约恩奥普市卫生系统中共同生产的演变——一项描述性定性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Nov 29;33(Supplement_2):ii15-ii22. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab060.
9
Impact of the Enhanced Universal Support Offer to Care Homes during COVID-19 in the UK: Evaluation using appreciative inquiry.英国在 COVID-19 期间向护理院提供强化普遍支持的影响:运用欣赏式探询进行评估。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e1824-e1834. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13612. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
10
Sustainment of a patient flow intervention in an intensive care unit in a regional hospital in Australia: a mixed-method, 5-year follow-up study.澳大利亚一家地区医院重症监护病房患者流量干预措施的维持:一项混合方法、5 年随访研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 22;11(6):e047394. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047394.