• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量即策略:瑞典约恩奥普市卫生系统中共同生产的演变——一项描述性定性研究。

Quality as strategy, the evolution of co-production in the Region Jönköping health system, Sweden: a descriptive qualitative study.

机构信息

Jönköping Academy, Jönköping University, Box 1026, Jönköping 55111, Sweden.

Region Jönköping, Box 1024, Jönköping 55111, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Nov 29;33(Supplement_2):ii15-ii22. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab060.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzab060
PMID:34849965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8633957/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pursuing the vision 'for a good life in an attractive region,' the Region Jönköping County (RJC) in Sweden oversees public health and health-care services for its 360 000 residents. For more than three decades, RJC has applied 'quality as strategy,' which has included increasing involvement of patients, family and friends and citizens. This practice has evolved, coinciding with the growing recognition of co-production as a fundamental feature in health-care services. This study views co-production as an umbrella term including different methods, initiatives and organizational levels. When learning about co-production in health-care services, it can be helpful to approach it as a dynamic and reflective process.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe the examples of key developmental steps toward co-production as a system property and to highlight 'lessons learned' from a Swedish health system's journey.

METHOD

This qualitative descriptive study draws on interviews with key stakeholders and on documents, such as local policy documents, project reports, meeting protocols and presentations. Co-production initiatives were defined as strategies, projects, quality improvement (QI) programs or other efforts, which included persons with patient experience and/or their next of kin (PPE). We used directed manifest content analysis to identify initiatives, timelines and methods and inductive conventional content analysis to capture lessons learned over time.

RESULTS

The directed content analyses identified 22 co-production initiatives from 1997 until today. Methods and approaches to facilitate co-production included development of personas, storytelling, person-centered care approaches, various co-design methods, QI interventions, harnessing of PPEs in different staff roles, and PPE-driven improvement and networks. The lessons learned included the following aspects of co-production: relations and structure; micro-, meso- and macro-level approaches; attitudes and roles; drivers for development; diversity; facilitating change; new perspectives on current work; consequences; uncertainties; theories and outcomes; and regulations and frames.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-production evolved as an increasingly significant aspect of services in the RJC health system. The initiatives examined in this study provide a broad overview and understanding of some of the RJC co-production journey, illustrating a health system's approach to co-production within a context of long-standing application of QI and microsystem theories. The main lessons include the constancy of direction, the strategy for improvement, engaged leaders, continuous learning and development from practical experience, and the importance of relationships with national and international experts in the pursuit of system-wide health-care co-production.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3839/8633957/655fb61b929f/mzab060f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3839/8633957/655fb61b929f/mzab060f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3839/8633957/655fb61b929f/mzab060f1.jpg
摘要

背景

瑞典延雪平郡(RJC)追求“在有吸引力的地区享受美好生活”的愿景,负责其 36 万居民的公共卫生和医疗服务。三十多年来,RJC 一直应用“质量即战略”,这包括增加患者、家属和朋友以及公民的参与。这种做法随着共同生产作为医疗服务基本特征的认识不断提高而不断发展。本研究将共同生产视为一个包括不同方法、举措和组织层面的总称。在了解医疗服务中的共同生产时,将其视为一个动态和反思的过程可能会有所帮助。

目的

本研究旨在描述将共同生产作为系统属性的关键发展步骤的实例,并突出展示瑞典卫生系统发展过程中的“经验教训”。

方法

本定性描述性研究借鉴了对主要利益相关者的访谈以及当地政策文件、项目报告、会议协议和演示文稿等文件。共同生产举措被定义为包括具有患者体验和/或其近亲(PPE)的人员在内的战略、项目、质量改进(QI)计划或其他努力。我们使用定向显式内容分析来识别举措、时间表和方法,并使用归纳常规内容分析来捕获随着时间的推移而获得的经验教训。

结果

定向内容分析从 1997 年至今确定了 22 项共同生产举措。促进共同生产的方法和方法包括开发角色模型、讲故事、以人为本的护理方法、各种共同设计方法、QI 干预、利用不同员工角色中的 PPE 以及 PPE 驱动的改进和网络。所获得的经验教训包括共同生产的以下方面:关系和结构;微观、中观和宏观层面的方法;态度和角色;发展动力;多样性;促进变革;对当前工作的新视角;后果;不确定性;理论和结果;以及法规和框架。

结论

共同生产作为 RJC 卫生系统服务中越来越重要的方面不断发展。本研究中检查的举措提供了对 RJC 共同生产之旅的广泛概述和理解,说明了卫生系统在长期应用质量改进和微观系统理论的背景下对共同生产的方法。主要经验教训包括方向的恒定性、改进策略、积极参与的领导者、从实践经验中不断学习和发展,以及在追求全系统医疗保健共同生产方面与国内外专家建立关系的重要性。

相似文献

1
Quality as strategy, the evolution of co-production in the Region Jönköping health system, Sweden: a descriptive qualitative study.质量即策略:瑞典约恩奥普市卫生系统中共同生产的演变——一项描述性定性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Nov 29;33(Supplement_2):ii15-ii22. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab060.
2
Exploring the potential of a multi-level approach to improve capability for continuous organizational improvement and learning in a Swedish healthcare region.探索一种多层次方法在瑞典一个医疗保健区域提高持续组织改进和学习能力方面的潜力。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 24;18(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3129-3.
3
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
4
Developing catalyst films of health experiences: an analysis of a robust multi-stakeholder involvement journey.开发健康体验的催化剂薄膜:对一个稳健的多利益相关者参与过程的分析。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jul 29;8(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00369-3.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Obstacles to implementation of an intervention to improve surgical services in an Ethiopian hospital: a qualitative study of an international health partnership project.埃塞俄比亚一家医院实施改善外科服务干预措施的障碍:一项关于国际卫生伙伴关系项目的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 17;16(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1639-4.
9
Sustaining improvement? The 20-year Jönköping quality improvement program revisited.持续改进?重温延雪平20年质量改进计划。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2015 Jan-Mar;24(1):21-37. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000048.
10
Patients' involvement in improvement initiatives: a qualitative systematic review.患者参与改进举措:一项定性系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):232-90. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1452.

引用本文的文献

1
A universal home-visit programme to tailor support to first-time parents: a qualitative case study on parents' perspectives.一项为初为人父母者量身定制支持的通用家访计划:关于父母观点的定性案例研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Sep 9;25(1):3045. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24114-z.
2
Exploring Different Levels of Contact Frequency in Multiple Sclerosis Care.探索多发性硬化症护理中不同程度的接触频率。
Brain Behav. 2025 Jul;15(7):e70634. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70634.
3
Exploring a process-oriented way of working - a case study involving primary and specialised care.

本文引用的文献

1
How might patient involvement in healthcare quality improvement efforts work-A realist literature review.患者如何参与医疗质量改进工作——一项现实主义文献综述。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):952-964. doi: 10.1111/hex.12900. Epub 2019 May 1.
2
What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis.在急性医疗环境中开发和实施共同生产的干预措施会带来哪些结果?一项快速证据综合分析。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 11;7(7):e014650. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014650.
3
The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care.
探索一种以流程为导向的工作方式——一项涉及初级保健和专科护理的案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 19;25(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12435-z.
4
Transforming Integrated Care Through Co-production: A Systematic Review Using Meta-ethnography.通过共同生产转变综合护理:一项运用元民族志的系统评价
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Mar 8;24(1):17. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7603. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
5
Older Persons' and Health Care Professionals' Design Choices When Co-Designing a Medication Plan Aiming to Promote Patient Safety: Case Study.老年人与医疗保健专业人员在共同设计旨在促进患者安全的用药计划时的设计选择:案例研究
JMIR Aging. 2023 Oct 5;6:e49154. doi: 10.2196/49154.
6
Lived experience of persons with multiple sclerosis: A qualitative interview study.多发性硬化症患者的生活体验:一项定性访谈研究。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jul;13(7):e3104. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3104. Epub 2023 May 29.
7
How Older Persons and Health Care Professionals Co-designed a Medication Plan Prototype Remotely to Promote Patient Safety: Case Study.老年人与医护专业人员如何远程共同设计药物治疗计划原型以促进患者安全:案例研究
JMIR Aging. 2023 Apr 7;6:e41950. doi: 10.2196/41950.
8
Improving heart failure care with an Experience-Based Co-Design approach: what matters to persons with heart failure and their family members?采用基于经验的共同设计方法改善心力衰竭护理:心力衰竭患者及其家庭成员关心的是什么?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 28;23(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09306-w.
共同产生了什么?医疗保健中的知识、价值观和社会关系。
PLoS Biol. 2017 May 3;15(5):e2001403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403. eCollection 2017 May.
4
Distinguishing Features and Similarities Between Descriptive Phenomenological and Qualitative Description Research.描述性现象学研究与定性描述研究之间的区别特征与相似之处。
West J Nurs Res. 2016 Sep;38(9):1185-204. doi: 10.1177/0193945916645499. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
5
Coproduction of healthcare service.医疗服务的共同生产
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):509-17. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
6
Demystifying theory and its use in improvement.揭开理论及其在改进中的应用的神秘面纱。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Mar;24(3):228-38. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
7
Sustaining improvement? The 20-year Jönköping quality improvement program revisited.持续改进?重温延雪平20年质量改进计划。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2015 Jan-Mar;24(1):21-37. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000048.
8
Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety.患者参与:当前的知识和在患者安全中的适用性。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Jan;85(1):53-62. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0248.
9
Making systemwide improvements in health care: Lessons from Jönköping County, Sweden.在医疗保健领域进行全系统改进:来自瑞典延雪平郡的经验教训。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2007 Jan-Mar;16(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/00019514-200701000-00003.
10
The health care quality journey of Jönköping County Council, Sweden.瑞典延雪平郡议会的医疗保健质量历程。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2007 Jan-Mar;16(1):2-9.