From the Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Neurology. 2015 Jan 27;84(4):359-66. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001190. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
To describe and analyze etiologies, clinical presentations, therapeutic management, and outcomes of patients with acute encephalitis and identify outcome predictors.
We conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with acute encephalitis at Mayo Clinic Rochester between January 2000 and December 2012. On the basis of the final diagnosis, the patients were categorized into 3 groups: viral encephalitis, autoimmune encephalitis, and encephalitis of unknown/other etiology. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze factors associated with good (modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2) or poor (scores of 3-6) outcome at hospital discharge.
We identified 198 patients (100 [50.5%] men and 98 [49.5%] women) with a median age of 58 years (range 41.8-69). Etiologies included viral infection (n = 95, 48%), autoimmune (n = 44, 22%), and unknown/others (n = 59, 30%). Good outcome at discharge was achieved by 48 patients (50.5%) with viral encephalitis, 17 (40.5%) with autoimmune encephalitis, and 32 (54.2%) with unknown/other etiologies. Mortality rates were 8%, 12%, and 5% in each of the 3 categories, respectively. On multivariate regression analysis, the factors that were associated with poor outcome were age 65 years or older (p = 0.0307), immunocompromised state (p = 0.0153), coma (p = 0.0062), mechanical ventilation (p = 0.0124), and acute thrombocytopenia (p = 0.0329). CSF polymorphonuclear cell count was also strongly associated with poor outcome in viral encephalitis (p = 0.0027).
Advanced age, immunocompromised state, coma, mechanical ventilation, and acute thrombocytopenia portend a worse prognosis in acute encephalitis. In contrast, the etiology of encephalitis, development of seizures or focal neurologic deficit, and MRI findings were not associated with clinical outcomes.
描述和分析急性脑炎患者的病因、临床表现、治疗管理和转归,并确定预后预测因素。
我们对 2000 年 1 月至 2012 年 12 月期间在梅奥诊所罗切斯特院区被诊断为急性脑炎的患者进行了回顾性研究。根据最终诊断,患者被分为 3 组:病毒性脑炎、自身免疫性脑炎和病因不明/其他脑炎。采用多变量逻辑回归分析来分析与出院时预后良好(改良 Rankin 量表评分为 0-2)或不良(评分为 3-6)相关的因素。
我们共纳入了 198 例患者(100 例男性,98 例女性;中位年龄 58 岁,范围 41.8-69 岁)。病因包括病毒感染(95 例,48%)、自身免疫(44 例,22%)和病因不明/其他(59 例,30%)。病毒性脑炎、自身免疫性脑炎和病因不明/其他脑炎患者出院时预后良好的比例分别为 48 例(50.5%)、17 例(40.5%)和 32 例(54.2%)。3 组患者的死亡率分别为 8%、12%和 5%。多变量回归分析显示,预后不良的相关因素包括年龄 65 岁及以上(p = 0.0307)、免疫抑制状态(p = 0.0153)、昏迷(p = 0.0062)、机械通气(p = 0.0124)和急性血小板减少症(p = 0.0329)。CSF 中性粒细胞计数与病毒性脑炎患者的不良预后也密切相关(p = 0.0027)。
年龄较大、免疫抑制状态、昏迷、机械通气和急性血小板减少症提示急性脑炎患者的预后较差。相反,脑炎的病因、癫痫发作或局灶性神经功能缺损的发生以及 MRI 发现与临床结局无关。