Buchan Blake W, Allen Stephen, Burnham Carey-Ann D, McElvania TeKippe Erin, Davis Thomas, Levi Michael, Mayne Donna, Pancholi Preeti, Relich Ryan F, Thomson Richard, Ledeboer Nathan A
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA Dynacare Laboratories, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Mar;53(3):804-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03108-14. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
A bloodstream infection with Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), is a serious condition that carries a high mortality rate and is also associated with significant hospital costs. The rapid and accurate identification and differentiation of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA directly from positive blood cultures has demonstrated benefits in both patient outcome and cost-of-care metrics. We compare the next-generation Xpert MRSA/SA BC (Xpert) assay to the GeneOhm StaphSR (GeneOhm) assay for the identification and detection of S. aureus and methicillin resistance in prospectively collected blood culture broths containing Gram-positive cocci. All results were compared to routine bacterial culture as the gold standard. Across 8 collection and test sites, the Xpert assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 99.6% (range, 96.4% to 100%) and a specificity of 99.5% (range, 98.0% to 100%) for identifying S. aureus, as well as a sensitivity of 98.1% (range, 87.5% to 100%) and a specificity of 99.6% (range, 98.3% to 100%) for identifying MRSA. In comparison, the GeneOhm assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 99.2% (range, 95.2% to 100%) and a specificity of 96.5% (range, 89.2% to 100%) for identifying S. aureus, as well as a sensitivity of 94.3% (range, 87.5% to 100%) and a specificity of 97.8% (range, 96.1% to 100%) for identifying MRSA. Five of six cultures falsely reported as negative for MRSA by the GeneOhm assay were correctly identified as positive by the Xpert assay, while one culture falsely reported as negative for MRSA by the Xpert assay was correctly reported as positive by the GeneOhm assay.
金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染,包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA),是一种严重疾病,死亡率高,且与高昂的医院成本相关。直接从阳性血培养物中快速、准确地鉴定和区分甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)和MRSA,已证明对患者预后和护理成本指标均有益处。我们将新一代Xpert MRSA/SA BC(Xpert)检测法与GeneOhm StaphSR(GeneOhm)检测法进行比较,以鉴定和检测前瞻性收集的含有革兰氏阳性球菌的血培养肉汤中的金黄色葡萄球菌及甲氧西林耐药性。所有结果均与作为金标准的常规细菌培养结果进行比较。在8个采集和检测地点,Xpert检测法鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌的灵敏度为99.6%(范围为96.4%至100%),特异性为99.5%(范围为98.0%至100%);鉴定MRSA的灵敏度为98.1%(范围为87.5%至100%),特异性为99.6%(范围为98.3%至100%)。相比之下,GeneOhm检测法鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌的灵敏度为99.2%(范围为95.2%至100%),特异性为96.5%(范围为89.2%至100%);鉴定MRSA的灵敏度为94.3%(范围为87.5%至100%),特异性为97.8%(范围为96.1%至100%)。GeneOhm检测法错误报告为MRSA阴性的6份培养物中有5份被Xpert检测法正确鉴定为阳性,而Xpert检测法错误报告为MRSA阴性的1份培养物被GeneOhm检测法正确报告为阳性。