Suppr超能文献

腹部支撑中不同类型收缩对左右腹肌不对称性的影响。

Effects of different types of contraction in abdominal bracing on the asymmetry of left and right abdominal muscles.

作者信息

Park Sung-Hyun, Song Min-Young, Park Hyeon-Ji, Park Ji-Hyun, Bae Hyun-Young, Lim Da-Som

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pusan, Republic of Korea.

Department of Physical Therapy, Dong-Eui Institute of Technology, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Dec;26(12):1843-5. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1843. Epub 2014 Dec 25.

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the effective strength levels of abdominal muscle contraction using the bracing contraction method. [Subjects] The experiment was conducted with 31 healthy male (M=15) and female (F=16) adults attending D University in Busan; all participants had less than obesity level BMI (BMI<30). [Methods] Bracing contraction was performed by the subjects in the hook-lying position at maximum and minimum pressure levels, five times each, using a Pressure Biofeedback Unit (PBU), and the mean measurement value was calculated. The maximum pressure level was set at 100% and the half maximum pressure level was set at 50%. Each subject's left and right abdominal muscle thicknesses were then measured by ultrasound imaging in each state: at rest, 100% contraction, and 50% contraction. [Results] No significant differences were found between the left and right sides of the transversus abdominis (TrA) at rest, 50%, or 100% contraction. The external oblique abdominis (EO) and internal oblique abdominis (IO) showed no significant difference at rest or at the 50% contraction. However, a significant difference was noted at 100% contraction for the EO and IO. [Conclusion] Application of abdominal contraction using bracing can achieve symmetry in the left and right abdominal muscles at less than the maximum contractile strength. The occurrence of asymmetry in the left and right abdominal muscles at the maximum contractile strength suggests that the most suitable contractile strength in this exercise is less than the maximum contractile strength.

摘要

[目的] 本研究旨在探讨使用支撑收缩法时腹部肌肉收缩的有效强度水平。[对象] 实验以31名就读于釜山D大学的健康成年男性(M = 15)和女性(F = 16)为对象;所有参与者的BMI均低于肥胖水平(BMI < 30)。[方法] 受试者在仰卧屈膝位使用压力生物反馈装置(PBU),分别在最大和最小压力水平下进行支撑收缩,各进行5次,计算平均测量值。最大压力水平设定为100%,半最大压力水平设定为50%。然后通过超声成像测量每个受试者在静息、100%收缩和50%收缩状态下左右腹直肌的厚度。[结果] 腹横肌(TrA)在静息、50%或100%收缩时左右两侧之间未发现显著差异。腹外斜肌(EO)和腹内斜肌(IO)在静息或50%收缩时未显示出显著差异。然而,在100%收缩时,EO和IO存在显著差异。[结论] 使用支撑法进行腹部收缩,在小于最大收缩强度时可使左右腹部肌肉达到对称。在最大收缩强度时左右腹部肌肉出现不对称,表明该运动中最合适的收缩强度小于最大收缩强度。

相似文献

8
The relationship of abdominal muscles balance and body balance.腹部肌肉平衡与身体平衡的关系。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2013 Jul;25(7):765-7. doi: 10.1589/jpts.25.765. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

本文引用的文献

6
Corticospinal activation of internal oblique muscles has a strong ipsilateral component and can be lateralised in man.
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Oct;158(4):474-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1939-5. Epub 2004 Jun 26.
9
Transversus abdominis and the superficial abdominal muscles are controlled independently in a postural task.
Neurosci Lett. 1999 Apr 16;265(2):91-4. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00216-5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验