Lee So Hee, Kim Tae Hoon, Lee Byoung Hee
Graduate School of Physical Therapy, Sahmyook University, Republic of Korea.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Jan;26(1):157-60. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.157. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of abdominal bracing with low extremity movement on changes in thickness of abdominal muscles and lumbar strength. [Subjects] Sixteen patients with chronic low back pain were randomly assigned to two groups: an abdominal bracing with active straight leg raise (ABSLR) group and abdominal bracing with ankle dorsiflexion (ABDF) group. [Methods] All subjects were evaluated for their abdominal muscle strength using a MedX Lumbar Extension Machine and thickness of external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), and transverse abdominis (TrA) muscles using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging. Subjects in both groups were instructed to perform Abdominal bracing (AB). Simultaneously, those in the ABSLR group performed active SLR, and those in the ABDF group performed ankle dorsiflexion. [Results] In comparison between the ABSLR and ABDF groups, significant differences in the thickness of the IO and TrA muscles were observed after the intervention in the ABSLR group. Also, lumbar strength was showed a significant increase in both groups after interventions. [Conclusion] The results of this study demonstrated that ABSLR is a more effective method than ABDF for improvement of abdominal stabilization by increasing the thicknesses of the TrA and IO.
[目的] 本研究旨在探讨腹部支撑联合下肢运动对腹部肌肉厚度变化及腰部力量的影响。[对象] 16例慢性下腰痛患者被随机分为两组:主动直腿抬高腹部支撑(ABSLR)组和踝关节背屈腹部支撑(ABDF)组。[方法] 所有受试者均使用MedX腰椎伸展机评估腹部肌肉力量,并使用康复超声成像评估腹外斜肌(EO)、腹内斜肌(IO)和腹横肌(TrA)的厚度。两组受试者均被指导进行腹部支撑(AB)。同时,ABSLR组受试者进行主动直腿抬高,ABDF组受试者进行踝关节背屈。[结果] 比较ABSLR组和ABDF组,干预后ABSLR组IO和TrA肌肉厚度有显著差异。此外,两组干预后腰部力量均显著增加。[结论] 本研究结果表明,ABSLR通过增加TrA和IO的厚度,在改善腹部稳定性方面比ABDF更有效。