Suppr超能文献

使用未填充树脂与填充树脂时复合树脂与牙釉质和瓷基底的微剪切粘结强度。

Microshear bond strength of composite resins to enamel and porcelain substrates utilizing unfilled versus filled resins.

作者信息

Najafi-Abrandabadi Ahmad, Najafi-Abrandabadi Siamak, Ghasemi Amir, Kotick Philip G

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Cariology and Comprehensive Care, NYU, College of Dentistry, New York, USA.

出版信息

Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Nov;11(6):636-44.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Failures such as marginal discoloration and composite chipping are still the problems of tooth-colored restorations on the substrate of enamel and porcelain, which some of these problems are consequently as a result of failures in the bonding layer. Using filled resin has been recently introduced to increase the bond strength of this layer. The aim of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength (μ-SBS) of composite resins to enamel incubated in periods of 24 h and 9 months and porcelain with unfilled resin and flowable composites (filled resin).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this in vitro study, two groups of 75 enamel samples with different storage times (24 h and 9 months) and a group of 75 porcelain samples were used. They were divided into 5 experimental groups of 15 samples in each. Composite cylinders in tygon tubes were bonded on the surface of acid-etched enamel and pretreated porcelain. Wave, Wave MV, Wave HV, Grandioflow and Margin Bond were used as bonding agents. The μ-SBS was measured at the speed of 1.0 mm/min. The bond strengths were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by Tukey test. P < 0.05 was selected as the level of statistical significance in this study.

RESULTS

The results showed that for enamel (24 h), the μ-SBS of the Wave MV and Wave HV groups were significantly lower than the Margin Bond group. Tukey test indicated the absence of a significant difference between the μ-SBS of the Wave group and the Margin Bond group. However, the μ-SBS of the Grandioflow group was significantly higher than the one for the Margin Bond as a bonding agent. In enamel (9 months), there was a significant difference between the Grandioflow and Margin Bond groups. Regarding bonding to the porcelain the one-way ANOVA test did not show a significant difference among the groups.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that flowable composites (filled resins) can be used instead of unfilled resins in bonding composite resins to enamel and porcelain substrates.

摘要

背景

诸如边缘变色和复合树脂崩裂等问题仍是基于牙釉质和瓷器基底的牙齿颜色修复体所面临的问题,其中一些问题是由于粘结层失效所致。最近引入了填充树脂以提高该层的粘结强度。本研究的目的是比较复合树脂与在24小时和9个月时间段内孵育的牙釉质以及与未填充树脂和可流动复合树脂(填充树脂)的瓷器之间的微剪切粘结强度(μ-SBS)。

材料与方法

在这项体外研究中,使用了两组75个具有不同储存时间(24小时和9个月)的牙釉质样本以及一组75个瓷器样本。它们被分为5个实验组,每组15个样本。将置于泰根管中的复合树脂圆柱体粘结在酸蚀牙釉质和预处理瓷器的表面。使用Wave、Wave MV、Wave HV、Grandioflow和Margin Bond作为粘结剂。以1.0毫米/分钟的速度测量μ-SBS。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)测试,随后进行Tukey检验来分析粘结强度。本研究选择P < 0.05作为统计学显著性水平。

结果

结果表明,对于牙釉质(24小时),Wave MV组和Wave HV组的μ-SBS显著低于Margin Bond组。Tukey检验表明Wave组和Margin Bond组的μ-SBS之间没有显著差异。然而,Grandioflow组的μ-SBS显著高于作为粘结剂的Margin Bond组。对于牙釉质(9个月),Grandioflow组和Margin Bond组之间存在显著差异。关于与瓷器的粘结,单因素方差分析测试未显示各组之间存在显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,在将复合树脂粘结到牙釉质和瓷器基底时,可流动复合树脂(填充树脂)可替代未填充树脂使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f2b/4275631/6208bc7232d9/DRJ-11-636-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验