Suppr超能文献

ACDC 试点试验:通过双锥线圈重复经颅磁刺激靶向扣带回前部治疗抑郁症。

The ACDC pilot trial: targeting the anterior cingulate by double cone coil rTMS for the treatment of depression.

作者信息

Kreuzer Peter M, Schecklmann Martin, Lehner Astrid, Wetter Thomas C, Poeppl Timm B, Rupprecht Rainer, de Ridder Dirk, Landgrebe Michael, Langguth Berthold

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):240-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the dorsolateral-prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with conventional figure-of-8 (=butterfly) coils has been used as an antidepressant therapeutic tool for almost twenty years. Very recently, an innovative rTMS coil, the so-called double cone coil (DC), was introduced allowing the modulation of the anterior cingulate cortex (AC). We investigated safety and therapeutic effectiveness of this stimulation in a naturalistic clinical setting.

METHOD

Forty-five patients suffering a moderate to severe depressive episode were randomized to receive 15 sessions of either conventional rTMS of the left DLPFC ("butterfly-rTMS"; 10 Hz; 2000 stimuli/day, RMT 110%), mediofrontal double cone coil stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex ("ACDC-rTMS" with equal parameters), or sham-stimulation. The primary outcome was the change in the 21-items Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) from baseline to the end of treatment. Secondary outcome measures were changes over the course of the trial regarding the HAMD, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scales.

RESULTS

There was a significant group × time interaction effect regarding the primary outcome (F = 3.269; df = 2,37; P = 0.049). Post-hoc t-testing revealed a significant effect for the comparison ACDC vs. butterfly at week 3/end of treatment (T = 2.646; df = 26; P = 0.014). No severe adverse events occurred during the study. ACDC-stimulation was well tolerated by the majority of patients similar like butterfly-rTMS and sham-stimulation.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of ACDC-rTMS-stimulation as an add-on-treatment for depression. Its clinical effects warrant further investigation in the future.

摘要

背景

使用传统的8字形(即蝴蝶形)线圈对背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)进行重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作为一种抗抑郁治疗工具已近二十年。最近,一种创新的rTMS线圈,即所谓的双锥线圈(DC)被引入,它可以调节前扣带回皮质(AC)。我们在自然主义的临床环境中研究了这种刺激的安全性和治疗效果。

方法

45名患有中度至重度抑郁发作的患者被随机分为三组,分别接受15次左侧DLPFC的传统rTMS治疗(“蝴蝶形rTMS”;10赫兹;每天2000次刺激,静息运动阈值的110%)、前扣带回皮质的中额双锥线圈刺激(“ACDC-rTMS”,参数相同)或假刺激。主要结局指标是从基线到治疗结束时21项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD)的变化。次要结局指标是在试验过程中HAMD、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、临床总体印象(CGI)和功能总体评定量表(GAF)的变化。

结果

关于主要结局指标存在显著的组×时间交互效应(F = 3.269;自由度 = 2,37;P = 0.049)。事后t检验显示,在第3周/治疗结束时,ACDC与蝴蝶形刺激比较有显著效果(T = 2.646;自由度 = 26;P = 0.014)。研究期间未发生严重不良事件。大多数患者对ACDC刺激的耐受性良好,与蝴蝶形rTMS和假刺激相似。

结论

这项初步研究证明了ACDC-rTMS刺激作为抑郁症附加治疗的可行性。其临床效果值得未来进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验