• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照试验比较了不同间隔时间的间歇性 theta 爆发刺激背内侧前额叶皮质。

Randomised controlled trial comparing different intersession intervals of intermittent theta burst delivered to the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex.

机构信息

Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Oct 23;27(1):e301290. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301290.

DOI:10.1136/bmjment-2024-301290
PMID:39448077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11499886/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) that can be administered in a fraction of the time of standard rTMS. Applying multiple daily iTBS sessions (ie, accelerated iTBS) may enable patients to achieve remission more rapidly. However, questions remain regarding the optimal time interval between treatment sessions.

OBJECTIVE

The overall aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of two accelerated bilateral iTBS protocols (ie, 30-min or 60-min intervals) and a once-daily bilateral iTBS protocol (ie, 0-min interval) while the number of pulses was held constant, in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

METHODS

182 patients with TRD were randomised to receive two sessions per day of bilateral iTBS of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC) at 60-min, 30-min or 0-min intervals. Sham treatments were delivered using a shielded 'sham coil' which produced the auditory and tactile sensations of stimulation. The primary outcome measure was a change in depression scores on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) after 20 days of treatment.

RESULTS

HRSD-17 scores improved across all groups; however, these improvements did not significantly differ between the three groups after 20 days of treatment. Similarly, response and remission rates did not differ between the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that contrary to our original hypothesis, implementing a 30-min or 60-min interval between two treatment sessions of DMPFC-iTBS does not lead to a more rapid improvement in symptoms, than once-daily iTBS administration.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02778035.

摘要

背景

间歇性 theta 爆发刺激(iTBS)是一种重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的形式,可以在标准 rTMS 的一小部分时间内进行。应用多次每日 iTBS 疗程(即加速 iTBS)可能使患者更快达到缓解。然而,关于治疗间隔的最佳时间间隔仍存在疑问。

目的

本研究的总体目的是比较两种加速双侧 iTBS 方案(即 30 分钟或 60 分钟间隔)和每日一次双侧 iTBS 方案(即 0 分钟间隔)的疗效和耐受性,同时保持脉冲数不变,治疗抵抗性抑郁症(TRD)患者。

方法

182 例 TRD 患者随机分为两组,每天接受两次双侧背内侧前额叶皮质(DMPFC)iTBS 治疗,间隔 60 分钟、30 分钟或 0 分钟。假治疗使用屏蔽的“假线圈”进行,产生刺激的听觉和触觉感觉。主要观察指标是治疗 20 天后汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HRSD-17)的抑郁评分变化。

结果

所有组的 HRSD-17 评分均有所改善;然而,治疗 20 天后,三组之间的这些改善没有显著差异。同样,反应率和缓解率在治疗组之间也没有差异。

结论

这些结果表明,与我们最初的假设相反,在 DMPFC-iTBS 的两次治疗之间实施 30 分钟或 60 分钟的间隔不会导致症状更快改善,而不是每日一次的 iTBS 给药。

试验注册号

NCT02778035。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2596/11499886/0efefa8b1839/bmjment-27-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2596/11499886/b7eea79e6bc1/bmjment-27-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2596/11499886/c6cfb1f13642/bmjment-27-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2596/11499886/0efefa8b1839/bmjment-27-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2596/11499886/b7eea79e6bc1/bmjment-27-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2596/11499886/c6cfb1f13642/bmjment-27-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2596/11499886/0efefa8b1839/bmjment-27-1-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Randomised controlled trial comparing different intersession intervals of intermittent theta burst delivered to the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex.随机对照试验比较了不同间隔时间的间歇性 theta 爆发刺激背内侧前额叶皮质。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Oct 23;27(1):e301290. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301290.
2
Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial.theta 爆发刺激与高频重复经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症的疗效比较(THREE-D):一项随机非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 28;391(10131):1683-1692. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30295-2. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
3
A randomized sham controlled comparison of once vs twice-daily intermittent theta burst stimulation in depression: A Canadian rTMS treatment and biomarker network in depression (CARTBIND) study.一项在抑郁症中比较每日一次与每日两次间歇性 theta 爆发刺激的随机假刺激对照研究:加拿大重复经颅磁刺激治疗和抑郁症生物标志物网络(CARTBIND)研究。
Brain Stimul. 2021 Nov-Dec;14(6):1447-1455. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.09.003. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
4
Accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation treatment in medication-resistant major depression: A fast road to remission?加速间歇性θ波爆发刺激治疗难治性重度抑郁症:通往缓解的快速通道?
J Affect Disord. 2016 Aug;200:6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
5
Efficacy of intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) and 10-Hz high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.间歇性theta波爆发刺激(iTBS)和10赫兹高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗难治性单相抑郁症的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Jan 13;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1764-8.
6
rTMS of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for major depression: safety, tolerability, effectiveness, and outcome predictors for 10 Hz versus intermittent theta-burst stimulation.背内侧前额叶皮质重复经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症:10赫兹与间歇性theta爆发刺激的安全性、耐受性、有效性及结果预测因素
Brain Stimul. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
7
Antidepressant effects of prolonged intermittent theta-burst stimulation monotherapy at the bilateral dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for medication and standard transcranial magnetic stimulation-resistant major depression: a three arm, randomized, double blind, sham-controlled pilot study.双侧背内侧前额叶皮质长程间歇性经颅磁刺激治疗药物和标准经颅磁刺激抵抗性重度抑郁症的抗抑郁作用:一项三臂、随机、双盲、假刺激对照的初步研究。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Oct;273(7):1433-1442. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01523-4. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
8
A randomized sham-controlled trial of high-dosage accelerated intermittent theta burst rTMS in major depression: study protocol.一项大剂量加速间歇 theta 爆破经颅磁刺激治疗重性抑郁的随机假刺激对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05470-9.
9
Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression.斯坦福加速智能神经调节治疗难治性抑郁症。
Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 1;177(8):716-726. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19070720. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
10
Implementation of intermittent theta burst stimulation compared to conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment resistant depression: A cost analysis.经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症中采用间歇性 theta 爆发刺激与常规重复经颅磁刺激的比较:成本分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0222546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222546. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Pursuing personalized medicine for depression by targeting the lateral or medial prefrontal cortex with Deep TMS.通过深部经颅磁刺激(Deep TMS)靶向外侧或内侧前额叶皮层治疗抑郁症的个性化医学研究。
JCI Insight. 2023 Feb 22;8(4):e165271. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.165271.
2
Optimal parameter determination of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating treatment-resistant depression: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症的最佳参数确定:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 1;13:1038312. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1038312. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparison of clinical outcomes with left unilateral and sequential bilateral Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) treatment of major depressive disorder in a large patient registry.
在一个大型患者登记处中,对左单侧和序贯双侧重复经颅磁刺激(TMS)治疗重度抑郁症的临床结果进行比较。
Brain Stimul. 2022 Mar-Apr;15(2):326-336. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
4
Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.斯坦福神经调节疗法(SNT):一项双盲随机对照试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;179(2):132-141. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.20101429. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
5
A randomized sham controlled comparison of once vs twice-daily intermittent theta burst stimulation in depression: A Canadian rTMS treatment and biomarker network in depression (CARTBIND) study.一项在抑郁症中比较每日一次与每日两次间歇性 theta 爆发刺激的随机假刺激对照研究:加拿大重复经颅磁刺激治疗和抑郁症生物标志物网络(CARTBIND)研究。
Brain Stimul. 2021 Nov-Dec;14(6):1447-1455. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.09.003. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
6
Accelerated theta burst stimulation for the treatment of depression: A randomised controlled trial.加速经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症的随机对照试验。
Brain Stimul. 2021 Sep-Oct;14(5):1095-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.07.018. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
7
Comparison of clinical outcomes with two Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation treatment protocols for major depressive disorder.两种经颅磁刺激治疗方案治疗重度抑郁症的临床疗效比较。
Brain Stimul. 2021 Jan-Feb;14(1):173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
8
Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression.斯坦福加速智能神经调节治疗难治性抑郁症。
Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 1;177(8):716-726. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19070720. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
9
Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-refractory major depressive disorder: A three-arm, blinded, randomized controlled trial.背内侧前额叶皮质重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性重度抑郁症:一项三臂、盲法、随机对照试验。
Brain Stimul. 2020 Mar-Apr;13(2):337-340. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
10
Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: the evidence thus far.重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症的疗效:目前的证据。
Gen Psychiatr. 2019 Aug 12;32(4):e100074. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2019-100074. eCollection 2019.