Southern California Costal Water Research Project Authority, Costa Mesa, CA, USA.
Southern California Costal Water Research Project Authority, Costa Mesa, CA, USA.
Water Res. 2015 Mar 1;70:337-49. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.12.008. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
Despite wide application to beach water monitoring and microbial source identification, results produced by quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods are subject to bias introduced by reliance on quantitative standards. Digital PCR technology provides direct, standards-free quantification and may potentially alleviate or greatly reduce other qPCR limitations such as difficulty in multiplexing and susceptibility to PCR inhibition. This study examined the efficacy of employing a duplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay that simultaneously quantifies Enterococcus spp. and the human fecal-associated HF183 marker for water quality assessment. Duplex ddPCR performance was evaluated side-by-side with qPCR and simplex ddPCR using reference material and 131 fecal and water samples. Results for fecal and water samples were highly correlated between ddPCR and simplex qPCR (coefficients > 0.93, p < 0.001). Duplexing Enterococcus and HF183 in qPCR led to competition and resulted in non-detection or underestimation of the target with low concentration relative to the other, while results produced by simplex and duplex ddPCR were consistent and often indistinguishable from one another. ddPCR showed greater tolerance for inhibition, with no discernable effect on quantification at inhibitor concentrations one to two orders of magnitude higher than that tolerated by qPCR. Overall, ddPCR also exhibited improved precision, higher run-to-run repeatability, similar diagnostic sensitivity and specificity on the HF183 marker, but a lower upper limit of quantification than qPCR. Digital PCR has the potential to become a reliable and economical alternative to qPCR for recreational water monitoring and fecal source identification. Findings from this study may also be of interest to other aspects of water research such as detection of pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes.
尽管定量聚合酶链反应 (qPCR) 方法已广泛应用于海滩水监测和微生物源识别,但结果仍可能受到定量标准依赖性带来的偏差影响。数字 PCR 技术提供了直接、无需标准的定量方法,可能有助于缓解或极大地减少其他 qPCR 限制,如多重PCR 的困难和对 PCR 抑制的敏感性。本研究考察了同时定量检测肠球菌属和人粪便相关 HF183 标记物的双液滴数字 PCR (ddPCR) 检测方法在水质评估中的应用效果。通过参考材料和 131 份粪便和水样,对 ddPCR 与 qPCR 和单液滴 ddPCR 的性能进行了平行评估。ddPCR 与单液滴 qPCR 之间的粪便和水样结果高度相关(相关系数>0.93,p<0.001)。在 qPCR 中对肠球菌属和 HF183 进行双重检测会导致竞争,从而导致靶标检测出现非检测或低估,特别是当靶标浓度相对较低时,而单液滴和双液滴 ddPCR 的结果则是一致的,并且通常彼此难以区分。ddPCR 对抑制的耐受性更高,在抑制剂浓度比 qPCR 高一个或两个数量级时,对定量检测几乎没有影响。总体而言,ddPCR 还表现出更好的精密度、更高的运行间重复性、对 HF183 标记物的诊断敏感性和特异性相似,但定量检测上限低于 qPCR。数字 PCR 有望成为一种可靠且经济的替代方法,可用于娱乐用水监测和粪便源识别。本研究结果可能也会引起其他水研究领域的关注,例如病原体和抗生素耐药基因的检测。