Dowell Rosalie, Craggs Jamie, Head Catherine, Yesson Chris, Ransome Emma
Institute of Zoology Zoological Society of London London UK.
Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences Imperial College London Ascot UK.
Ecol Evol. 2025 May 23;15(5):e70919. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70919. eCollection 2025 May.
Marine sponges as natural samplers of environmental DNA (eDNA) are receiving growing attention as an untapped source of biodiversity data. However, little is known about the state of DNA (e.g., cellular or extracellular) that is captured by these samples and how this compares to conventional aquatic eDNA samples. Here, we present an artificial spiking experiment where DNA in cellular and extracellular states was added into tanks containing two sponge species. Aquatic eDNA samples and sponge natural sampler DNA (nsDNA) samples were collected over 7 days and DNA from the two states was quantified in each sample using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). We found that there was a significant interaction between DNA state and sample type (eDNA and nsDNA), with lower detection and concentration of extracellular DNA, compared to cellular DNA, found in nsDNA samples. We also found that detection rate and concentration of DNA were significantly lower in nsDNA than in eDNA overall. During methodological testing, PCR inhibition was observed in both sponge species; this was prohibitive in one of the species. Further work to investigate the degree of PCR inhibition during nsDNA metabarcoding is important to understand its impact on the communities resolved using nsDNA methods. . We show that nsDNA may originate from a subset of the DNA present in environmental media, potentially providing a more stable picture of local communities. Natural samplers provide a promising option for hard-to-reach environments and for retrieving biodiversity data from archived samples; however, further work and optimization are required to understand what is and is not well represented by this sample type compared to widely applied aquatic eDNA approaches.
海洋海绵作为环境DNA(eDNA)的天然采样器,正作为一个未开发的生物多样性数据来源而受到越来越多的关注。然而,对于这些样本所捕获的DNA状态(例如细胞内或细胞外)以及与传统水生eDNA样本相比情况如何,人们了解甚少。在此,我们开展了一项人工加样实验,将细胞内和细胞外状态的DNA添加到装有两种海绵物种的水箱中。在7天内收集水生eDNA样本和海绵天然采样器DNA(nsDNA)样本,并使用定量实时PCR(qPCR)对每个样本中两种状态的DNA进行定量。我们发现DNA状态与样本类型(eDNA和nsDNA)之间存在显著交互作用,在nsDNA样本中,与细胞内DNA相比,细胞外DNA的检测和浓度较低。我们还发现,总体而言,nsDNA中的DNA检测率和浓度显著低于eDNA。在方法测试过程中,在两种海绵物种中均观察到PCR抑制现象;在其中一个物种中这种抑制作用很强。进一步研究nsDNA宏条形码分析过程中的PCR抑制程度,对于理解其对使用nsDNA方法解析的群落的影响很重要。我们表明,nsDNA可能源自环境介质中存在的一部分DNA,有可能提供当地群落更稳定的情况。天然采样器为难以到达的环境以及从存档样本中获取生物多样性数据提供了一个有前景的选择;然而,与广泛应用的水生eDNA方法相比,还需要进一步开展工作并进行优化,以了解这种样本类型能很好代表什么以及不能很好代表什么。