Tousignant Cody, Bodner Glen E, Arnold Michelle M
University of Calgary, Canada.
University of Calgary, Canada.
Conscious Cogn. 2015 May;33:78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.11.011. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
The influence of test context on reports of recollection and familiarity depends on how these subjective recognition experiences are conceptualized and measured. Bodner and Lindsay (2003) found that critical items elicited more remember judgments but fewer know judgments in a less (vs. more) memorable context. In contrast, Tousignant and Bodner (2012) found that independent ratings of recollection and familiarity were both higher in a less memorable context. We replicated the dissociative pattern with judgments using recollect/familiar labels (Experiment 1), and in a novel R/F/B task that added a "both" option to eliminate the mutual exclusivity between the recollect and familiar options (Experiment 2). Adding a "guess" option eliminated these context effects (Experiment 3), however whether allowing guesses "cleans up" or "desensitizes" recollection and familiarity judgments remains unclear. Determining which task variants provide appropriate measures of subjective recognition experiences will require an examination of additional dissociations and triangulation with other measures.
测试情境对回忆和熟悉度报告的影响取决于这些主观识别体验是如何被概念化和测量的。博德纳和林赛（2003年）发现，在记忆程度较低（与较高相比）的情境中，关键项目引发的“记得”判断更多，但“知道”判断更少。相比之下，图西尼安和博德纳（2012年）发现，在记忆程度较低的情境中，回忆和熟悉度的独立评分都更高。我们在使用“记得/熟悉”标签的判断中重复了这种分离模式（实验1），并在一个新颖的R/F/B任务中重复了这种模式，该任务增加了一个“两者都有”选项以消除“记得”和“熟悉”选项之间的互斥性（实验2）。增加一个“猜测”选项消除了这些情境效应（实验3），然而，允许猜测是“清理”还是“降低敏感度”回忆和熟悉度判断仍不清楚。确定哪些任务变体能够提供对主观识别体验的适当测量，将需要检查更多的分离情况，并与其他测量方法进行三角验证。
