Suppr超能文献

测量工具的最小重要变化值更多地取决于基线值,而不是干预类型。

Minimally important change values of a measurement instrument depend more on baseline values than on the type of intervention.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 May;68(5):518-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Multi-item questionnaires are frequently used to measure outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with sciatica. Knowing the minimaly important change (MIC) values for these instruments will facilitate interpretation of change scores. MIC values have been shown to be dependent on baseline values. The question is whether they also depend on the type of intervention. To estimate the MIC of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (modified 23 item version) (RMDQ) and of intensity of leg pain measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in patients with sciatica and to assess to what extent MIC values depend on type of intervention and on baseline values.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

This is a secondary analysis of RCT data of the effects of early surgery vs. prolonged conservative treatment in patients with sciatica. Baseline and 8-week data were used to assess MIC of the RMDQ-23 and VAS leg pain. We used the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) method to assess the MIC. Global Perceived Recovery (rated 8 weeks after baseline) was used as anchor. Subgroups were created based on type of treatment and baseline severity.

RESULTS

The MIC value of the RMDQ-23 for the total group of sciatica patients was 7.5. The values were 8.1 and 6.9 for surgery and conservative treatment, respectively. For high and low baseline values, the MICs were 9.0 and 4.9, respectively, irrespective of treatment received. The MIC values of the VAS leg pain were 34.4 for the total group. For surgery and conservative treatment, the MIC values were 38.5 and 30.4, respectively, whereas for groups with high and low baseline values, MIC values of 53.5 and 17.2 were found.

CONCLUSION

The MIC values of the RMDQ-23 and VAS leg pain were found to be highly dependent on their baseline values, although the type of intervention appeared to influence the MIC value only slightly.

摘要

目的

在坐骨神经痛患者的随机对照试验(RCT)中,常使用多项目问卷来衡量结果。了解这些工具的最小重要变化(MIC)值将有助于解释变化分数。已经表明 MIC 值取决于基线值。问题是它们是否也取决于干预类型。本研究旨在评估坐骨神经痛患者的 Roland Morris 残疾问卷(改良 23 项版本)(RMDQ)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量的腿部疼痛强度的 MIC 值,并评估 MIC 值在多大程度上取决于干预类型和基线值。

研究设计和设置

这是一项对坐骨神经痛患者早期手术与长期保守治疗效果的 RCT 数据的二次分析。使用基线和 8 周的数据来评估 RMDQ-23 和 VAS 腿部疼痛的 MIC 值。我们使用接收者操作特征(ROC)方法来评估 MIC 值。总体感知恢复(在基线后 8 周进行评估)作为锚定标准。根据治疗类型和基线严重程度创建了亚组。

结果

坐骨神经痛患者总体组的 RMDQ-23 的 MIC 值为 7.5。手术组和保守治疗组的 MIC 值分别为 8.1 和 6.9。对于高基线值和低基线值,MIC 值分别为 9.0 和 4.9,无论接受何种治疗。VAS 腿部疼痛的 MIC 值为 34.4。对于手术组和保守治疗组,MIC 值分别为 38.5 和 30.4,而对于高基线值和低基线值组,MIC 值分别为 53.5 和 17.2。

结论

RMDQ-23 和 VAS 腿部疼痛的 MIC 值高度依赖于其基线值,尽管干预类型似乎仅略微影响 MIC 值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验