• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重创伤性脑损伤患者早期不进行心肺复苏医嘱的变异性

Variability in early do not attempt resuscitation orders among patients with serious traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Dean Dylan, Martinez Michael S, Newgard Craig D

机构信息

The Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):54-60. doi: 10.1111/acem.12555. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1111/acem.12555
PMID:25545694
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4362714/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective was describe the use of early do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) orders in patients with serious traumatic brain injury (TBI) and its association with outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all serious TBI patients admitted through the emergency department (ED) to acute care hospitals in California between 2002 and 2010 using ED International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9), admitting diagnosis codes specifying intracranial hemorrhage. DNAR placement within 24 hours of admission was the primary variable of interest. Outcomes included neurosurgical procedures and in-hospital mortality. Hospital and patient characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariable generalized estimation equation regression models to account for hospital-level clustering.

RESULTS

Of all 76,962 patients with serious TBI, 71,275 were admitted at 141 hospitals that each cared for at least 10 serious TBI patients annually and formed the primary sample. Early DNAR orders were placed in 7.5% of patients (range = 0 to 36.1% by hospital). Early DNAR use varied by trauma designation: Level I, 4.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.8% to 4.4%); Level II, 6.7% (95% CI = 6.5% to 7.1%); Level III, 9.7% (95% CI = 8.4% to 11.3%); and nontrauma hospitals, 10.8% (95% CI = 10.6% to 11.3%). Early DNAR was also less likely in teaching hospitals (9.3% vs. 4.3%). These results persisted after accounting for age, year, and hospital-level clustering. In-hospital mortality (39.4% vs. 8.7%) and neurosurgical interventions (14.5% vs. 19.7%) also differed for patients with versus without early DNAR orders. Patients 65 years of age and older constituted 87.7% of those with early DNAR orders; our findings remained qualitatively unchanged when restricted to older adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of early DNAR orders among patients with serious TBI is highly variable by individual hospital and hospital type, suggesting substantial practice variation. Associations with fewer surgical intervention and higher mortality suggest that such practice variation may be contributing to differences in TBI outcomes, particularly among older adults.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者早期不进行心肺复苏(DNAR)医嘱的使用情况及其与预后的关系。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2002年至2010年间通过急诊科(ED)收治于加利福尼亚州急性护理医院的所有严重TBI患者,使用ED国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9),入院诊断代码明确为颅内出血。入院24小时内下达DNAR医嘱是主要研究变量。预后指标包括神经外科手术和院内死亡率。使用描述性统计分析医院和患者特征,并使用多变量广义估计方程回归模型来考虑医院层面的聚类情况。

结果

在所有76,962例严重TBI患者中,71,275例在141家医院入院,每家医院每年至少收治10例严重TBI患者,这些患者构成了主要样本。7.5%的患者下达了早期DNAR医嘱(各医院范围为0至36.1%)。早期DNAR的使用因创伤指定级别而异:一级创伤中心为4.0%(95%置信区间[CI]=3.8%至4.4%);二级创伤中心为6.7%(95%CI=6.5%至7.1%);三级创伤中心为9.7%(95%CI=8.4%至11.3%);非创伤医院为10.8%(95%CI=10.6%至11.3%)。教学医院早期下达DNAR医嘱的可能性也较低(9.3%对4.3%)。在考虑年龄、年份和医院层面的聚类情况后,这些结果仍然存在。有早期DNAR医嘱和无早期DNAR医嘱的患者在院内死亡率(39.4%对8.7%)和神经外科干预(14.5%对19.7%)方面也存在差异。65岁及以上的患者占下达早期DNAR医嘱患者的87.7%;当仅纳入老年人时,我们的研究结果在定性上没有变化。

结论

严重TBI患者早期DNAR医嘱的使用在不同医院和医院类型之间差异很大,表明实践存在很大差异。与较少的手术干预和较高的死亡率相关,表明这种实践差异可能导致TBI预后的差异,特别是在老年人中。

相似文献

1
Variability in early do not attempt resuscitation orders among patients with serious traumatic brain injury.严重创伤性脑损伤患者早期不进行心肺复苏医嘱的变异性
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):54-60. doi: 10.1111/acem.12555. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
2
End-of-life decision-making for patients admitted through the emergency department: hospital variability, patient demographics, and changes over time.急诊科收治患者的临终决策:医院变异性、患者人口统计学特征及随时间的变化。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(4):381-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12112.
3
Impact of early do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders on procedures and outcomes of severe sepsis.早期不进行心肺复苏医嘱对严重脓毒症治疗程序及预后的影响
J Crit Care. 2016 Dec;36:134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.06.030. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
4
End-of-life decisions in emergency patients: prevalence, outcome and physician effect.急诊患者的临终决策:患病率、结局和医生的影响。
QJM. 2018 Aug 1;111(8):549-554. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcy112.
5
Therapeutic temperature modulation in severe or moderate traumatic brain injury: a propensity score analysis of data from the Nationwide Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank.重度或中度创伤性脑损伤中的治疗性温度调节:来自日本全国神经创伤数据库数据的倾向评分分析
J Neurosurg. 2016 Feb;124(2):527-37. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.JNS141895. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
6
Sex Differences in "Do Not Attempt Resuscitation" Orders After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and the Relationship to Critical Hospital Interventions.院外心脏骤停后“不复苏”医嘱的性别差异,以及与关键医院干预的关系。
Clin Ther. 2019 Jun;41(6):1029-1037. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
7
Emergent operation for isolated severe traumatic brain injury: Does time matter?孤立性重度创伤性脑损伤的急诊手术:时间重要吗?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Nov;79(5):838-42. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000719.
8
The Utstein template and the effect of in-hospital decisions: the impact of do-not-attempt resuscitation status on survival to discharge statistics.乌特斯坦模板与住院决策的影响:不进行心肺复苏状态对出院生存率统计的影响。
Resuscitation. 2001 Dec;51(3):233-7. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(01)00425-7.
9
Do Sex Differences Exist in the Establishment of "Do Not Attempt Resuscitation" Orders and Survival in Patients Successfully Resuscitated From In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest?性别差异是否存在于“不进行复苏尝试”医嘱的制定和成功复苏的院内心搏骤停患者的生存中?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Feb 18;9(4):e014200. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014200. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
10
Do-not-attempt resuscitation independently predict in-hospital mortality in septic patients.不进行复苏独立预测脓毒症患者院内死亡率。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 May;38(5):953-957. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158362. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing screening tool for hospice needs and end-of-life decision-making process in the emergency department.用于在急诊科推进临终关怀需求和临终决策过程的筛查工具。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Feb 23;23(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01391-w.
2
Traumatic brain injury in patients aged ≥65 years versus patients aged ≥80 years: a multicenter prospective study of mortality and medical resource utilization.≥65岁患者与≥80岁患者的创伤性脑损伤:一项关于死亡率和医疗资源利用的多中心前瞻性研究。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;8(2):94-102. doi: 10.15441/ceem.20.045. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
3
Perceptions of ICU Care Following Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: A Military Perspective.对下达“不要复苏”医嘱后重症监护室护理的认知:军事视角
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Jul 16;2(7):e0153. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000153. eCollection 2020 Jul.
4
Variation in outcomes among 24/7 percutaneous coronary intervention centres for patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.24/7 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心对院外心脏骤停患者复苏后结局的差异。
Resuscitation. 2019 Feb;135:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.12.015. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
5
Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Epidemiology, Outcomes, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Directions.老年创伤性脑损伤:流行病学、结局、知识空白与未来方向
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Apr 1;35(7):889-906. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5371. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
6
Association between hospital rates of early Do-Not-Resuscitate orders and favorable neurological survival among survivors of inhospital cardiac arrest.住院心脏骤停幸存者中早期“不要复苏”医嘱的医院比例与良好神经功能存活之间的关联。
Am Heart J. 2017 Nov;193:108-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
7
End of Life Care and Do Not Resuscitate Orders: How Much Does Age Influence Decision Making? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.临终关怀与不进行心肺复苏医嘱:年龄对决策有多大影响?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2017 Jun 12;3:2333721417713422. doi: 10.1177/2333721417713422. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.脑出血患者的不复苏(DNR)医嘱。
Int J Stroke. 2014 Jan;9(1):53-8. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12161. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
2
Do-not-resuscitate orders in trauma patients may bias mortality-based effect estimates: an evaluation using the PROMMTT study.创伤患者的不复苏医嘱可能会影响基于死亡率的效果估计:使用 PROMMTT 研究进行的评估。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1 Suppl 1):S89-96. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828fa422.
3
End-of-life decision-making for patients admitted through the emergency department: hospital variability, patient demographics, and changes over time.急诊科收治患者的临终决策:医院变异性、患者人口统计学特征及随时间的变化。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(4):381-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12112.
4
Trends in Traumatic Brain Injury in the U.S. and the public health response: 1995-2009.美国创伤性脑损伤的趋势和公共卫生应对措施:1995-2009 年。
J Safety Res. 2012 Sep;43(4):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2012.08.011. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
5
The impact of early do not resuscitate (DNR) orders on patient care and outcomes following resuscitation from out of hospital cardiac arrest.早期不复苏(DNR)医嘱对心肺复苏后院外心搏骤停患者的治疗和结局的影响。
Resuscitation. 2013 Apr;84(4):483-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.08.327. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
6
Are we underestimating the burden of traumatic brain injury? Surveillance of severe traumatic brain injury using centers for disease control International classification of disease, ninth revision, clinical modification, traumatic brain injury codes.我们是否低估了创伤性脑损伤的负担?使用疾病控制中心国际疾病分类、第九修订版、临床修正版、创伤性脑损伤代码对严重创伤性脑损伤进行监测。
Neurosurgery. 2012 Dec;71(6):1064-70; discussion 1070. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826f7c16.
7
Early do-not-resuscitate orders in intracerebral haemorrhage; frequency and predictive value for death and functional outcome. A retrospective cohort study.早期脑溢血患者不进行心肺复苏术的医嘱;对死亡和功能预后的频率和预测价值。一项回顾性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 May 25;20:36. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-36.
8
Traumatic brain injury in an aging population.老年人群中的创伤性脑损伤。
J Neurotrauma. 2012 Apr 10;29(6):1119-25. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1995. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
9
Epidemiological shifts in elderly traumatic brain injury: 18-year trends in Pennsylvania.老年人创伤性脑损伤的流行病学变化:宾夕法尼亚州 18 年的趋势。
J Neurotrauma. 2012 May 1;29(7):1371-8. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2197. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
10
Do-not-resuscitate orders and predictive models after intracerebral hemorrhage.脑出血后的不复苏医嘱和预测模型。
Neurology. 2010 Aug 17;75(7):626-33. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ed9cc9. Epub 2010 Jul 7.