• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不进行复苏独立预测脓毒症患者院内死亡率。

Do-not-attempt resuscitation independently predict in-hospital mortality in septic patients.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Neurosurgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, New-Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2020 May;38(5):953-957. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158362. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158362
PMID:31358382
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis patients require timely and appropriate treatment in an intensive care setting. However, "do-not-attempt resuscitation" (DNAR) status may affect physicians' priorities and treatment preferences. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether DNAR status affects the outcomes of septic patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study included septic patients admitted to the emergency department intensive care unit (ED-ICU) in a university-based teaching hospital during April-November 2015. Septic patients admitted to the ED-ICU were included.

RESULTS

Of the 132 eligible patients, 49.2% (65/132) had DNAR status (median age 80 years old, IQR, 73-86). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 28.8% (38/132). Non-survivors had a higher percentage of receiving inotropes/vasopressors (52.6% vs 34.0%, p = 0.048), higher median Charlson comorbidity index scores [8.5 (IQR, 7-11.75) vs 8 (IQR, 6-9), p = 0.012], higher APACHE II score [25 (IQR, 20-30.25) vs 20 (IQR, 17-25), p = 0.002], and higher SOFA score [7 (IQR, 6-11) vs 6 (IQR,4-8), p = 0.012]. There was no significant difference in intubation among the two groups. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, DNAR status was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio = 6.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (2.71-17.88), p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve for the logistic regression model was 0.84 [95% CI = (0.77-0.92), p < 0.001]. In subgroup analysis, DNAR status remained an independent predictor of mortality among age ≥65 years and ≥80 years.

CONCLUSION

After adjusting for comorbidities, treatments, and illness severity, DNAR status was associated with in-hospital mortality of septic patients. Further studies should evaluate physicians' attitudes toward septic patients with DNAR status.

摘要

简介

脓毒症患者需要在重症监护病房(ICU)中得到及时和适当的治疗。然而,“不尝试复苏”(DNAR)状态可能会影响医生的治疗优先级和治疗偏好。本研究旨在评估 DNAR 状态是否会影响脓毒症患者的预后。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2015 年 4 月至 11 月期间在一所大学附属医院急诊 ICU(ED-ICU)收治的脓毒症患者。纳入 ED-ICU 收治的脓毒症患者。

结果

在 132 名符合条件的患者中,49.2%(65/132)有 DNAR 状态(中位年龄 80 岁,IQR,73-86)。总的院内死亡率为 28.8%(38/132)。非幸存者接受血管活性药物(血管加压素/正性肌力药物)的比例更高(52.6% vs 34.0%,p=0.048),Charlson 合并症指数评分中位数更高[8.5(IQR,7-11.75)vs 8(IQR,6-9),p=0.012],急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统 II 评分更高[25(IQR,20-30.25)vs 20(IQR,17-25),p=0.002],序贯器官衰竭评估评分更高[7(IQR,6-11)vs 6(IQR,4-8),p=0.012]。两组之间插管率无显著差异。多变量 logistic 回归分析显示,DNAR 状态是院内死亡的独立预测因素(比值比=6.22,95%置信区间(CI)=(2.71-17.88),p<0.001)。logistic 回归模型的 AUC 为 0.84[95%CI=(0.77-0.92),p<0.001]。亚组分析显示,DNAR 状态仍然是年龄≥65 岁和≥80 岁的脓毒症患者死亡的独立预测因素。

结论

在校正合并症、治疗和疾病严重程度后,DNAR 状态与脓毒症患者的院内死亡率相关。进一步的研究应评估医生对有 DNAR 状态的脓毒症患者的态度。

相似文献

1
Do-not-attempt resuscitation independently predict in-hospital mortality in septic patients.不进行复苏独立预测脓毒症患者院内死亡率。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 May;38(5):953-957. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158362. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
2
[Lactic acid, lactate clearance and procalcitonin in assessing the severity and predicting prognosis in sepsis].[乳酸、乳酸清除率及降钙素原在评估脓毒症严重程度及预测预后中的作用]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Apr;32(4):449-453. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200129-00086.
3
Prognostic scores for early stratification of septic patients admitted to an emergency department-high dependency unit.急诊科高依赖病房收治的脓毒症患者早期分层的预后评分
Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;21(4):254-9. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000075.
4
Characteristics and outcomes of "Do Not Resuscitate" patients admitted to the emergency department-Intensive care unit.急诊-重症监护病房“不复苏”患者的特征和结局。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 Jan;118(1 Pt 2):223-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 May 3.
5
Risk factors for mortality despite early protocolized resuscitation for severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.急诊科对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克进行早期规范化复苏后仍存在的死亡风险因素。
J Crit Care. 2016 Feb;31(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
6
Impact of early do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders on procedures and outcomes of severe sepsis.早期不进行心肺复苏医嘱对严重脓毒症治疗程序及预后的影响
J Crit Care. 2016 Dec;36:134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.06.030. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
7
End-of-life decision-making for patients admitted through the emergency department: hospital variability, patient demographics, and changes over time.急诊科收治患者的临终决策:医院变异性、患者人口统计学特征及随时间的变化。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(4):381-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12112.
8
[Combination of Weighted index of comorbidities and sepsis-related organ failure assessment score in death risk evaluation of septic patients].[合并症加权指数与脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估评分相结合在脓毒症患者死亡风险评估中的应用]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Jan;26(1):41-5.
9
Variability in early do not attempt resuscitation orders among patients with serious traumatic brain injury.严重创伤性脑损伤患者早期不进行心肺复苏医嘱的变异性
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):54-60. doi: 10.1111/acem.12555. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
10
End-of-life decisions in emergency patients: prevalence, outcome and physician effect.急诊患者的临终决策:患病率、结局和医生的影响。
QJM. 2018 Aug 1;111(8):549-554. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcy112.

引用本文的文献

1
Be-SNAP: the Belgian Sepsis National Action Plan.比利时脓毒症国家行动计划(Be-SNAP)
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 1;13:1575502. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1575502. eCollection 2025.
2
Do-not-attempt resuscitation policy reduced in-hospital cardiac arrest rate and the cost of care in a developing country.在发展中国家,不进行复苏尝试的政策降低了院内心脏骤停发生率和医疗成本。
Libyan J Med. 2024 Dec 31;19(1):2321671. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2024.2321671. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
3
Do-Not-Attempt-Cardiopulmonary-Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions in patients admitted through the emergency department in a Swedish University Hospital - An observational study of outcome, patient characteristics and changes in DNACPR decisions.
瑞典某大学医院急诊科收治患者的不尝试心肺复苏(DNACPR)决策——一项关于结局、患者特征及DNACPR决策变化的观察性研究
Resusc Plus. 2022 Feb 4;9:100209. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100209. eCollection 2022 Mar.