Suppr超能文献

不进行复苏独立预测脓毒症患者院内死亡率。

Do-not-attempt resuscitation independently predict in-hospital mortality in septic patients.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Neurosurgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, New-Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2020 May;38(5):953-957. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158362. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis patients require timely and appropriate treatment in an intensive care setting. However, "do-not-attempt resuscitation" (DNAR) status may affect physicians' priorities and treatment preferences. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether DNAR status affects the outcomes of septic patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study included septic patients admitted to the emergency department intensive care unit (ED-ICU) in a university-based teaching hospital during April-November 2015. Septic patients admitted to the ED-ICU were included.

RESULTS

Of the 132 eligible patients, 49.2% (65/132) had DNAR status (median age 80 years old, IQR, 73-86). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 28.8% (38/132). Non-survivors had a higher percentage of receiving inotropes/vasopressors (52.6% vs 34.0%, p = 0.048), higher median Charlson comorbidity index scores [8.5 (IQR, 7-11.75) vs 8 (IQR, 6-9), p = 0.012], higher APACHE II score [25 (IQR, 20-30.25) vs 20 (IQR, 17-25), p = 0.002], and higher SOFA score [7 (IQR, 6-11) vs 6 (IQR,4-8), p = 0.012]. There was no significant difference in intubation among the two groups. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, DNAR status was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio = 6.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (2.71-17.88), p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve for the logistic regression model was 0.84 [95% CI = (0.77-0.92), p < 0.001]. In subgroup analysis, DNAR status remained an independent predictor of mortality among age ≥65 years and ≥80 years.

CONCLUSION

After adjusting for comorbidities, treatments, and illness severity, DNAR status was associated with in-hospital mortality of septic patients. Further studies should evaluate physicians' attitudes toward septic patients with DNAR status.

摘要

简介

脓毒症患者需要在重症监护病房(ICU)中得到及时和适当的治疗。然而,“不尝试复苏”(DNAR)状态可能会影响医生的治疗优先级和治疗偏好。本研究旨在评估 DNAR 状态是否会影响脓毒症患者的预后。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2015 年 4 月至 11 月期间在一所大学附属医院急诊 ICU(ED-ICU)收治的脓毒症患者。纳入 ED-ICU 收治的脓毒症患者。

结果

在 132 名符合条件的患者中,49.2%(65/132)有 DNAR 状态(中位年龄 80 岁,IQR,73-86)。总的院内死亡率为 28.8%(38/132)。非幸存者接受血管活性药物(血管加压素/正性肌力药物)的比例更高(52.6% vs 34.0%,p=0.048),Charlson 合并症指数评分中位数更高[8.5(IQR,7-11.75)vs 8(IQR,6-9),p=0.012],急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统 II 评分更高[25(IQR,20-30.25)vs 20(IQR,17-25),p=0.002],序贯器官衰竭评估评分更高[7(IQR,6-11)vs 6(IQR,4-8),p=0.012]。两组之间插管率无显著差异。多变量 logistic 回归分析显示,DNAR 状态是院内死亡的独立预测因素(比值比=6.22,95%置信区间(CI)=(2.71-17.88),p<0.001)。logistic 回归模型的 AUC 为 0.84[95%CI=(0.77-0.92),p<0.001]。亚组分析显示,DNAR 状态仍然是年龄≥65 岁和≥80 岁的脓毒症患者死亡的独立预测因素。

结论

在校正合并症、治疗和疾病严重程度后,DNAR 状态与脓毒症患者的院内死亡率相关。进一步的研究应评估医生对有 DNAR 状态的脓毒症患者的态度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验